I find that the chances are that the first review of a new girl will be by a reviewer with only 1 or perhaps 2 reviews under his belt and also little or no posts at all. This 'coincidence ' I see time and time again. This is particularly so for younger escorts Anyone else think the same ?
New Girls-- Disconcerting
Printable View
-
30-05-11, 18:01ksteveNew Girls-- Disconcerting
-
30-05-11, 18:05bhoywonder
seen it time and time again. i pay very little heed to these reviews.
-
30-05-11, 18:39ThomasJ
It seems to be the case - of the 20 reviews I have submitted 2 are first reviews of new girls - both were crackers and I have seen them again.
For me if the profile attracts I am tempted irrespective of the reviews - risky but great fun. -
30-05-11, 18:54ksteveYes I agree and I guess so would most others-- so why do the Mods let these through unqualified then ? Surelythere should be some system of vetting, before someone can post their first reviews.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhoywonder
Yes, I have done this myself on a number of occasions but you have a list of reviews to your name.!Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasJ
If you have seen ladies with prevoius negative reviews then you have been 100% lucky or successful-- if the later, please pass on your MO.! -
30-05-11, 19:02samladIt's hard to keep track of the 300-400 reviews we receive on a weekly basis, and many clients that don't usually review are encouraged by the escorts to do it for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by ksteve
There have been lots of opinions that there should be minimum posts, etc. but in reality, clients that see escorts shouldn't really be expected to post if they don't want to; perhaps they don't care for the banter on the forums.
For first time reviewers, the review mods don't just activate the review anyway. They receive a PM from the review mods to respond to a 'confirmation' message to ensure that they are returning reviewers and not just someone creating a profile and submitting a review to promote/discredit an escort. They have 5 days to respond otherwise the review is just deleted. I can appreciate that this isn't full-proof, but it does prevent 'one-offers' getting through the net. -
30-05-11, 19:27n73
Maybe it's time we brought in some sort of trusted reviewer system, maybe put some sort of mark like a gold shield beside their user name. Anyone else agree ?
-
30-05-11, 19:32ThomasJIf there is a vacancy for a reviewer of new girls I humbly submit my CV.Quote:
Maybe it's time we brought in some sort of trusted reviewer system, maybe put some sort of mark like a gold shield beside their user name. Anyone else agree ?
-
30-05-11, 19:42ksteveOut of an average then of say 45 reviews per day, only a percentage of those will be for new girls where the reviewer is also new or nearly new. There cant be more than a 5-10 suspect reviews of this nature per day.Quote:
Originally Posted by samlad
Yes, I agree as I'm not one much for the 'banter' myself but if a member fails to contribute to the threads then I dont think there is anything wrong with having his early reviews placed under a bit more scrutiny than perhaps otherwise might be the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by samlad
I dont think it does ensure and I think the 1 and 2 'off'ers' are getting through more than they should. I think this system ought to be reviewd itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by samlad
-
30-05-11, 19:44ksteveQuote:
Originally Posted by n73
Well perhaps before becoming a reviewer at all, there should be a few more hurdles to jump in the first place.