I just noticed the review below:
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 024746 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
The comment from the review mod specifies that this is the newest review of the escort and the older review got deleted (according to the review rules). However, due to a mistake of the reviewer, the newest review is N/A. Based on this, I personaly would not have deleted the old one if this was anything else then a N/A. I do assume it was a positive one.
All Top XX (Most Reviewed Escorts, El Gordo's Reliables) and Miss XX competitions here take in consideration only the actual reviews: positives, negatives and neutrals. A non applicable review is just an interesting reading material when it comes to the escort in cause, not anything else.
So, do you think it is fair that an escort gets a positive review, the reviewer makes an innocent small mistake for the second review which was also meant to be a positive, the review mod deletes the second entry and then the poor escort has one posittive review less ???
Just want to know your opinion in general, please don't bring into argument anything about the particular escort, reviewer or review mod.
New Reviews - Old Reviews
Printable View
-
04-06-10, 02:07Karin KissNew Reviews - Old Reviews
-
04-06-10, 03:40Prickly
I think myself that if a new review is different they should be both / all left up. Sometimes a second or third review has no detail and you just have a general comment like "third time to see Abcd..." I'd like to read them all myself and compare.
But you can't please everyone...... -
04-06-10, 07:08anon361
Ok, there are a couple of issues here, firstly he said he was let down by Jessica so it's probable the first review was a negative or at best a neutral (we don't know because it was deleted) so had he submitted a positive review on this occasion and the first was negative, according to the rules the first review should be left up with the second as his experience has changed considerably, but as he submitted a neutral and the first was also a neutral / negative then it hasn't significantly changed..
The problem is guys select the wrong option out of the initial 3 questions and if you pick the one that says made booking but didn't see escort you don't get to fill in the multiple choice questions which are what dictate whether it will be Neg, N/a or Pos and by default it will always be N/A.
The review mods have in the past stated that they cannot second guess whether a review should be pos or neg solely on his comments, but I do agree in some instance it is so blatantly obvious that they should.. -
04-06-10, 07:10takemedrunkimhomeI think that was well spotted Karin and I agree totally with prickly. If a client keeps seeing a lady and gives herQuote:
Originally Posted by Prickly
loads of positive reviews, then the most detailed one should be left in my opinion.
I know the onus is on us punters to not keep submitting like reviews for escorts, but for the minority that still do, would
leaving the most detailed as opposed to the most recent be an option? (Most recent review could be something like "third time to see
xxxx, please see previous reviews").
However if there are conflicting reviews of an escort, surely all those reviews should be left up so all
punters can take what they want out of each review? -
04-06-10, 07:30El Gordo
The initial review in this case was #23149. It was neutral,
It looks like this one was equally confused, since he's reviewing an escort he didn't meet, but it's not an N/A.Code:
Escort(s): Jessica
Reviewer: Felster
Join Date: 13/12/08
Message Board Usergroup: Registered User
Message Board Posts: 0
Reviews: 19
Type: Female Escort
Location: Dublin
Incall or Incall
Outcall:
Time / Date: 7pm / 25/04/10
Duration: 30 Minutes
Cost: ?130
Last reviewer is not wrong. I don't think she is even in the country.
She told me that she was going to be delayed at the last minute to
Review: make sure I was near her place, then she asked me if i'd meet with
her friend Sara. I met Sara who was quite nice, but felt Jessica was
taking advantage of my hornyness. :(
Favourites Oral, Sex, French Kissing
Enjoyed:
Accuracy of Not Applicable
Photos:
Incall Very Happy
Location:
Physical Fairly Attractive
Appearance:
Service Fairly Happy
Provided:
Value for Fairly Happy
Money:
Overall Neither Happy nor Unhappy
Satisfaction
Would You Maybe
Recommend?
Would You Maybe
See Again?:
This review was submitted or last updated on 26/04/10.
-
04-06-10, 07:48anon361Thanks Gordo, your right, his first review shouldn't have been put up either as like you said he's reviewing another girl on Jessica's profile, looks like he should have selected, made a booking but didn't meet in that instance, can people not read :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gordo
-
04-06-10, 08:15ViolettePeople can read just fine, it is their dicks that have a problem with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon361
-
04-06-10, 08:25anon361HeHe, unfortunately Violette in your presence the little brain is always going to take over, mind you I have heard a swift kick to the nuts puts him right back in his place ;) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Violette