Mr Fussy's review of Lucy Chambers which has been discussed at length already here on another thread is a disgrace and a poor reflection of the review system here.
He went to the door and seemingly did not fancy her and so he posted a negative review.
The review was subsequently removed and then reinstated...
I just want to register my disappointment with the abuse of the rules......
I will leave it at that (although I want to rant a bit more)
BLD
a disgrace
Printable View
-
29-08-10, 04:40bigladduba disgrace
-
29-08-10, 08:26dub1
I strongly agree with bigladdub the treatment Lucy Chambers received from mr fussy and other posters is in effect bullying. I hope yous lot got your kicks from bullying a lady.Yous are skangers the lot of yous.
-
29-08-10, 09:47wanted the best 69
i agree but as of yesterday, the bit that i find hardest in this is the position of mr.fussy saying he has met her before, and lucy saying she never met him before, in my day that used to be called someone is lying
-
29-08-10, 09:53DoozerAt the end of teh day the rules state if no booking was made you cannot reviewQuote:
Originally Posted by bigladdub
Howeveer if a booking was made and teh client turned up only to not be able to go through with it he is allowed to say why
Whether it be teh bait and switch
didnt finf her attractive
or any other reason why he wouldnt go through with it -
29-08-10, 11:46nibbbottom line
bottom line is fussy just went to door didnt like how she was dressed . And he wrote a review to tell us that . And then its called a review. A ladie can dress how ever she wants and shouldnt have to fear some (i wont say ) coming to door turning on his heel and writing a negative review . It makes a joke of the whole system. And finally with over 130 review under his belt u would think he would b more respectfull to ladies
-
29-08-10, 12:50Sensual DelightsGuys the review is not a negative one, it is a just a N/A.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigladdub
N/A stands for NON APPLICABLE.
Nobody takes N/A reviews seriously unless the info there reflect badly about the escort.
(mainly if the escort is not the one in the photos).
I also think that Mr. Fussy should not have written anything, as his N/A review was way too personal, that no other potential client can ever have any benefit from it.
But in my opinion, this entire thread developed into much noise about a small thing.
The only loss here was Lucy's booking at the time, as the client decided to walk away.
No potential clients would ever avoid to book her based on a very personal N/A review. -
29-08-10, 14:49Lucy Chambers
Come on people, its done and dusted. That was last week. I am cool, I am sure mr F is, lets just drop it.
-
29-08-10, 22:02jayf1
i think you all should read the review again mr fussy left a comment on it and from what i take from it was that he had met lucy before and that appointment did not go great.
i guess when you have met so many escorts you can forget who you have met in the past and it was not untill he was face to face with lucy that he remembered.
he didnt leave her a bad review he didnt even say he had met lucy before untill all this blew up from nothing. -
29-08-10, 22:58debestLucy has denied that she met him. I think this is her first time in Ireland . She also challenged MrF to reveal a personal detail about (some body feature) her that all her clients should know. As far as I'm aware MrF has failed to do so as of yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by jayf1
-
29-08-10, 23:10Rayden
LOL Mr F is just like Mayweather ducking Manny. :D
-
30-08-10, 00:04nibbseriouslyif he cannot answer this it raises serious questions about fussys reviewsQuote:
Originally Posted by debest
-
30-08-10, 02:07Lucy Chambers
This is my last post on this matter. I have worked in Northern Ireland since May, on and off. I have worked in southern ireland twice since June. I have asked for clarification on some issues, and that is that. You cannot call in to doubt 130 reviews because of a small issue. I am sorry this has ended up going so entirely ridiculously silly, and I really would appreciate it if it could end. Like now. It isn't good for me, and I think it has been done to death.
-
30-08-10, 11:47vampirejackieLucy has a point here, can you all stop the harrassment of Mr Fussy. It is like a bloomin witch hunt and uncalled for. Some people deal with their issues in private and via PM and just because a member chooses not to answer to some thread doesnt mean its not dealt with.Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy chambers
-
30-08-10, 12:20wanted the best 69vampieQuote:
Originally Posted by vampirejackie
is it not time to lock all of these threads and move on???????????????????????????? -
30-08-10, 12:23Mondler
FYI :
xxxoQuote:
Comment by Reviewer MrFussy on 27/08/10:
Final statement on the matter.
Monica -
30-08-10, 12:24vampirejackie
We dont like to lock threads unless it is absolutley neccessary. If we are all adults, why not just not post on here. Matter Closed.!
-
30-08-10, 13:16wanted the best 69my feeling is it will flare up again and again, if its lock its finishedQuote:
Originally Posted by vampirejackie
-
30-08-10, 14:34Lucy Chambers
Ok. Upon speaking with ad staff, it seems my f is seriously mistaken. I have asked for the comment to be removed. End of matter.