Simple question.
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 008696 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
Printable View
Please give reasons why you think it's a fake or not. Help me understand.
yes but that is just my opinion
i dont believe in giving reviews if nothing happened
other peoples views might differ but i can respect that
everyone is entiteled to their own opinion
dont know if its fake but it should be deleted/edited as its insulting...
"at the end of the day they are hookers and should be damn glad"
some cheek to say that!
Captain J...
He was a bit of a prick especially with his last comment but the 3 month rule doesn't apply because that rule wasn't in place at the time he submitted the review, he also made a booking and met the ladies so again he is entitled to submit a review, but yes he was a dick IMO with his comments being paid or not they are still ladies and like any lady they should be treated with respect and they don't need to be damn glad of anything..
It almost seems as though he wrote the review at the behest of someone else to get back at carmen and malena.
i am saying if i dont follow through with an appointment i dont give a review
it is something called respect
More like there was confusion with the booking as the ladies as far as I can remember had 3 numbers, one each and one for duo bookings? Maybe he rang and the ladies thought he had booked a duo, when he arrived possibly the felt messed around which his attitude as apparent in his review amplified the situation and in spite he wrote an overly negative review,
I wouldn't say it was ratted because of his sentiments but more likely because of his spitful selection of all the negative options as far as looks and location were concerned, having been with one of these ladies his choices go completely against what I would have said.
Here is another review by the same client
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 018167 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
This is scary stuff !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There are lots of reviews ratted with no reason given. You've picked one that was ratted ages ago, a review of two ladies who no longer tour Ireland. Why? What are you up to?
WTF?? What are you up to here? What do you think I'm up to?
Like I've said, I trust this guys reviews from personal experiance and don't think his review should be ratted. I don't recall noticing any of these other reviews.
You're taking back what you said about me imagining things then? Apology accepted.
Opinions are split so far. Anon (as usual) is the only one to give me a genuine reason why the review is ratted.
ElGordo, when you figure out my agenda make sure you post it. I'm sure everyone wants to know, including myself.
Since some of the people voting haven't been around long enough to know the full story, let me explain the context here.
Busty Malena and Carmen had a big public fight on the boards with Liz Hilton, who was later banned for various offences, including posting people's personal information on her blog. This fight, which had been going on for a while, got really nasty in late January of 2009.
On the afternoon of 19 January 2009 three things happened at roughly the same time:
- dingdong visited Liz and wrote a glowing review,
- he suddenly "remembered" that he had visited BM&C the previous year and wrote a negative review, their only negative review, and
- An Garda Siochana raided BM&C's hotel room, acting on an anonymous tip.
Shortly after this, BM&C's tour ended. They have never come back.
Now I don't know dingdong, and it is theoretically possible that this is all coincidence and that his negative review of BM&C had nothing to do with his visit to Liz, or to her fight with them. But the timing certainly doesn't look good.
And I don't know you, debest, so I don't know why you are suddenly trying to get this rat removed, more than a year and a half after all this happened.
Why didn't you just say all this in the first place?
I've only started posting here in the last few months and had no idea about any of this. I never asked for it to be unratted, just looking for others opinions on why they thought it was ratted.
I've already stated that me and dingdong have seen some of the same escorts and he was bang on in his reviews. I read this review some time last year, it's certainly a memorable review and I didn't forget it. Before I started this thread https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...-profiles.html, I noticed that the same review had been ratted and I couldn't understand why. I initially thought it was because of the language he used, but he uses this type of langauge in most of his reviews. Now you have provided this info (which I thank you for), I'll approach his reviews with caution.
If this is how it all went down, then I agree that a coincidence is unlikely and it deserves a rat.
It does shed a new light on the review one which I missed until it was pointed out to me last night, thanks btw.
To me this is a clear argument for some sort of a mark be placed on a profile similar to a rat but to show the reviewer is suspect. It would be unfair to rat all his reviews as debest has pointed out some are on the ball.
Here's his review of Liz on the same day he reviewed Malena and Carmen. Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 008695 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
I feel like a right cunt now. A lot to learn I do.
I think there's an infraction on the way for Anon and then he'll leave. Sweet! This was all worth it!
In fairness, at least 4 other people were in agreement with me. But they didn't make cunts of themselves on the boards.
I've just been looking through some of Hot Lizzy's old posts. Nice lady.....
El Gordo has it spot on. It's to do with the Liz and Malena & Carmen feud. It was very conveneint that he wrote such a glowing review of Liz and around the same time he wrote a very negative review of these girls.
Reasons for ratting reviews are given now. But they weren't always given.
Now that everybody agrees review was rightly ratted, how about a petition to edit out last line? Genuine or fake, no review should have such a language no matter how bad the experience?
And maybe a brief note could be attached saying why it was ratted. At the time it must have been obvious to everyone, but as we can see, now it is easy to miss the background.
Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:
01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.
Mods always give reasons now why a review is ratted. This is an old review. They weren't always given an explanation back then. I'm not sure exactly when this review was ratted or who originally ratted it. This review is more than a year and a half ago. It could have been us, the review moderators before us or ad staff.