verified "doctored" fotos

Just a brief note to say that I have now quit this game ... was never a big user anyway. The number of escorts advertising with doctored fotos with their own faces pasted on is exceptional.... I would say at least 50% of the fotos are altered in this way. Also several agencies behind so called "independents" are putting up pictures of escorts that do not exist. It just defeats the whole purpose of having a genuine site where people paying the equivalent of €300 /hr can get some decent value. This is the best paid job in the world so the least a customer can expect is honesty! You get to an escort who has "verified" fotos with a size 8 slim and tanned body and then you find a size 14+ and add on about 6 years to the age. It's just a complete con and the people using these services are foolish if they will not exercise a boycott until it is remedied. Unless of course they are satisfied with this. It does NOT happen in the UK or Czech, Poland or Hungary ...... Remember this is just one aspect ... the number of ripoffs on time is huge - pay 30 minutes get 15 or pay 60 minutes get 30... I don't care anymore cos I'm out but people using these services should insist on better value....they should at least get what they agreed to pay for.

Agree with you entirely, but this is a VERY difficult problem for us to resolve.

I've just spent all morning on Google Image search and eventually I've proved:

https://www.escort-ireland.com/4112/...sh-escort.html

is actually

http://www.darknightlingerie.com/images/80111.jpg

But it took several hours to find that!

We are currently trying out solutions from http://www.picscout.com and http://www.ideeinc.com/products/pixid/

We really need something smart that can regonise fake photos as doing it manually is too difficult.

I'll keep you posted!

Pat x

Few tips from studying this webpage!

1. If photos are not verified, you are taking chances!

2. If escort has opted OUT of reviews, you are taking chances.

3. Check out profiles, some statistics do not match photos, taking chances.

4. Pricing may also indicate a gamble! You cannot compromise quality for quantity (coming once in 30 minutes for hard earned 100euro)!

5. Phone agreements are also chances!

6. There is high risk in all agreements, maybe until you have become a regular!

7. Profiles are all adverts, all that escorts want are your money in the minimal possible time and efforts by them (well most of them).

8. You can not get near a fire without being burnt, or feeling the heat, unless you wear an asbestos suit!!

9. So aim low to avoid disaster and when you go in there, despite your hard earned cash, the mobile calls, the travelling etc, know that you are taking chances, even more chances against some other things!

10. You have choices to make!! Some of them include taking chances!!

11. The sex act also happens per chance! Could be great could be frustrating. After sex, all animals are sad.

12. I am not an expert, just taking chances and aiming low to avoid disaster!!

Taking chances again?

On reviews, these could be by pimps, friends, or the escorts themselves. Besides, the reviewer's comment is based on his/her exepreience which could be different from yours.

When you needed a boyfriend/girlfriend or husband/wife, did you get one on the reference of the previous one!? Ask a silly question!?

Keeping on taking chances and do not cry when hurt!!?

How about escorts coming into the office (s) to verify their photos? Picture perfect, unless they bribe the verifiers!! Enough posts for today!

Some escorts are forever young. Since 2004 they are 19 years old. Thank God for Mara, she is now 19 (Happy Birthday). When she came in last year, she was 18. Monica in Dublin is very good from her comms and webpage, her email add suggest she was born 1984 and she has been confessing 23years for a while, should be 24 now! (I love her and am waiting to take chances with her). As for Ambassador escorts, Stacey, Claudia, Gabby, to name a few, at least Sandra is a cartoon (take chances!), they are forever young if you can get hold of them. Claudia has been 19 since 2005, maybe even before!

I suppose I could write an article on this webpage, maybe I just did!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Foto Fraud

Just a brief note to say that I have now quit this game ... was never a big user anyway. The number of escorts advertising with doctored fotos with their own faces pasted on is exceptional.... I would say at least 50% of the fotos are altered in this way. Also several agencies behind so called "independents" are putting up pictures of escorts that do not exist. It just defeats the whole purpose of having a genuine site where people paying the equivalent of €300 /hr can get some decent value. This is the best paid job in the world so the least a customer can expect is honesty!.

---

The _effective_ way to solve this is to educate people into refuse any service if the picture don't match.
It took me "two services" out of three to decide I'm not going to accept too much difference from the pictures.

And possibly to write reviews. It's clear that it's impossible to verify genuine reviews, nonetheless I found fakers quite inept at writing genuine-looking ones.

WHY DO YOU STILL POST FOTOS AND DESCRIPTIONS THAT YOU KNOW TO BE FALSE, AFTER THIS HAS BEEN POINTED OUT TO YOU ??

EG Mary - TOTALLY FALSE - THIS IS A BROTHEL NOT AN INDEPENDENT - NO GIRL THERE WITH THOSE FOTOS - SERVICES ADVERTISED NOT AVAILABLE IN BROTHEL ??

SO...FALSE FOTO....FALSE DESCRIPTIONS .....FALSE "INDEPENDENTS" .... LET'S GET IT RIGHT .... THERE ARE DOZENS OF THESE ON THE WEBSITE .... DO YOU REALLY WANT A LIST OF THEM .... YOU KNOW WHO THEY ARE ALREADY !

THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN VERIFY FOTOS AS GENUINE IS TO TAKE THE ADVICE OF SOME OF YOUR CONTRIBUTORS .... TAKE THE FOTOS YOURSELF IN STUDIO AND DONT TOUCH THEM UP OR ALTER THEM IN ANY WAY. THAT IS WHAT THE PUNTERS WANT !

Dear All,

I also had my first bad experience which I would like to relate. I had decided to visit Janna (Pat feel free to remove the names in this post if it is not OK to give them), as she advertises as a mature escort and the pictures are very sexy. I called the mobile number indicated on Janna's profile and received instructions to go to a certain hotel. When there, I called again and was given a room number. I knocked and an entirely different girl opened. I asked if Janna was absent or going to be back soon and she answered that in that hotel room she was the only one to work. I checked when at home and she advertises under the name of Monica in Donnybrook. She was pretty and very kind, so I decided to remain. But she was 25 and entirely different in body size, hais color, etc. from the girl I had decided to visit
I would like to stress the fact that it was not the girl in the hotel who took my phone calls. She did not even know that I was arriving. It must have been a receptionist of some agency who "distributes" customers to girls according to criteria that I don't understand. All in all, a complete turn-off and a very frustrating experience.
Even if I was not strong enough this time to turn my back immediately and leave, I promised myself that this will not happen to me again. Should it happen, the next time I will politely refuse and walk away. I will have just wasted my (limited) free time.
I am not blaming you Pat, as this kind of things are probably out of your control. But I think you should be informed that, apparently once again, the "verified picture" system has shown its limitations. Maybe a good idea would be to "ban" all those gilrs like Janna who probably don't even exist and just serve to increase agency's probabilities to attract the attention of punters.
With many thanks an best regards,

Lino