As nearly all members of the E-I Community are well aware, rags such as the Sunday World publish (mainly fabricated [and exaggerated half-truth at best]) articles to portray the Sex Industry in a completely negative light (on behalf of organizations such as TORL and Ruhama).
This is achieved by portraying all Sex Workers as exploited victims (though TORL, Ruhama [and the Sunday World on their behalf]) choose to focus only on women working in the Sex Industry).
It was when the Sunday World published an article about a male Escort about a year ago (who up to then worked in Ireland), and described said male Escort's business operations in a manner which absolutely degraded him (to the point that, as best I'm aware, the gentleman in question had to leave Ireland), and portrayed him as despicable.
What I can't understand is; Why when a woman chooses to work in this industry of her own free will she is portrayed (by rags such as the Sunday World) as trafficked, coerced and subject to all manner of unthinkable abuse (which is certainly not the case in any lady I've ever met through E-I), yet a man who chooses to work in the Sex Industry is portrayed in the manner which the Sunday World portryaed the above mentioned male Escort?
Could this be an example of the mask of TORL and Ruhama (and buddies The Sunday World) slipping?
Articles written on behalf of Ruhama and TORL
Printable View
-
25-10-14, 15:37The EqualizerArticles written on behalf of Ruhama and TORL
-
25-10-14, 18:59celticden
-
25-10-14, 19:04AmantAmant365
Methinks it's about selling newspapers.. Sex sells, even in rags on a Sunday morning.. Also give's them a "reason" to hypocritically show some tits and ass as well..
It's all bollox.. -
25-10-14, 21:51FatBastard3rd wave feminism, it's undoing alot of the work that has been done before them.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Equalizer