That's it from me as regards posting reviews until things are changed, something that has been promised since November. There is no point in reading reviews that start, can't remember the date, it was on her last tour etc...they are meaningless and, in my experience, more often than not ,fake. In addition a number of posts have been submitted pointing out fakes and no action taken e.g Busymouse and El Gordos post. Enjoy.
No more reviews from me
Printable View
-
10-02-10, 22:17MrFussyNo more reviews from me
-
10-02-10, 22:23Westsidex:(:(:(:(:(Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
-
10-02-10, 22:47MrFussySmilesYou sure they shouldn't be smiles Westie:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Westsidex
-
10-02-10, 22:54topgunThats a shame
I rely on your posts - always the girls I seem to like and always thorough
-
10-02-10, 23:18Hillwalker
Westie is such an ass hole - hopefully the next time he leaves....it will be permenent - but then again he will just change his handle.....
-
11-02-10, 00:00bigladdubMr FussyMr Fussy,Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
I am sad that you have taken this decision. I do understand your point of view though. As I have said in previous posts, I am one of the members who does not review (reasons stated) but rely on those who do review..... in any event, I for one hope that common sense prevails in relation to your comments and I really hope that things can be resolved. I am not optimistic though...
BLD -
11-02-10, 00:57adogwithaboneI cannot agree with you in resect of the dates thing. With touring girls you may have to wait months until she comes around again. I think that the three month rule is daft in that situation. Even if the girl appears two month later who is going to remember the exact time and date that they met her? It is also my experience that most fake reviews are specific about times/dates.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
We all know that the reviews are a mess but I do not see how the prima donna act helps anyone or anything. -
11-02-10, 14:14Westsidex:moon:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillwalker
:feckyou:
Westside. -
11-02-10, 14:21Epsilonhttp://www.yobbo.com.au/assets/weightliftingtits.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Westsidex
-
12-02-10, 00:15JAMESCORKI’m sorry but I have to disagree. I can travel to Dublin and meet a girl on her last night, on my first night. I don’t get home till two days later only to find she is not up anymore. Now I want to review this girl because a) she was a cracker or b) she was shite. I have to wait until she reappears till I can post.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
The date and time are irrelevant. The trustworthiness of the reviewer is more applicable. Why can’t we have a forum to discuss reviewers, and badge reviewers, to arrive at a more exact ‘Trusted Reviewer’ system. It is dead handy to skip the shite and go to the trusted review when scanning profiles. -
13-02-10, 01:52MrFussyAgreeAs far as I am concerned a time limit should be imposed e.g 1 week (as already suggested by another poster)...if the girl is not active in this timeline the review should still be posted, someone has already suggested that the profile is not 'Suspended' maybe just not active..anything after this as far as I am concerned is not valid as a review....Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMESCORK
-
13-02-10, 02:18punterminatorIt's a shame you've chosen to stop reviewing MrF as you are definitely one of the reviewers I tend to read and trust.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
I know exactly where you are coming from, however on a few occasions I have been guilty of doing the same myself. Sometimes it was because the escort in question was not advertising here when I saw here (Cherri & Diana spring to mind) and I decided to stick in a review when they began here. Other occasions I have completely to post a review and it doesn't strike me until the lady comes back to Cork again. -
13-02-10, 02:27MrFussySorryI really do want to post again, I saw Jessica in Dublin yesterday ad Jesus guys if you show a bit of respect, she is a gem...But anyways...We are all guilty of not posting a review on time...all I am saying is lets be sensible, 3 months is too long, a gap, the system whereby a girls' profile is suspended is not working, so should be adapted to allow reviews up to say, 1 week. after the suspension date...meanwhile if you PM me I will send you details of my latest reviews:-)Quote:
Originally Posted by punterminator
-
13-02-10, 11:09adogwithaboneI totally disagree. Your problem is that you are seeing so many escorts that they all become a blur in your mind. I can remember enough about every escort that I met in the last year to review her. The details of everything said and every position tried are irrelevant. How the girl compared to the profile in looks and services, her attitude, her involvement and her ability to communicate are all that is required.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
I find that many of my reviews do not appear and when I try again a few days later, the girl has gone. The three month rule makes no sense if the profile is not always available for review.
All genuine reviews are valuable, be they a day or a year old. A point to remember is that most clients are using this website and seeing escorts for some time before they become members and start to write reviews. Their recollections of the good and bad escorts that they have met are as valuable as reviews as any others. -
13-02-10, 11:42adogwithaboneYou already know that I disagree with you. I actually prefer to wait some time to consider a meeting and decide what to say or not say before writing a review. I am concious that anything that I say will directly impact on the girl and her ability to earn a living. I do not think that it is fair to rush out a review without due consideration. Obviously, the reviews that have negative elements are the ones that need most thought. However, there are instances, where I have had an amazing time with an escort and the temtation was to rush into a gushing review, but on reflection I realised that there were negative elements that needed to be commented on even if they did not affect me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
-
13-02-10, 12:31MrFussyBlur?No issue with you disagreeing. As regards my 'problem', that is not fair. Just because I have seen a lot of girls does not make them a blur. The girls I really like I go back to on a regular basis. Just thought I'd clarify.Quote:
Originally Posted by adogwithabone
-
13-02-10, 13:15adogwithaboneI was being jocular, i should have added a grin. Here is one now:DQuote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
-
13-02-10, 14:17MrFussyCheersReally like your reviews:)Quote:
Originally Posted by adogwithabone
-
13-02-10, 14:38whiteknight111Euornews- no commentQuote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
YouTube - Close to you -
13-02-10, 17:05MR-LOVA
i tend to read and trust MR.Fussy,please keep up the good work...theres a lot of fake reviewers on here and your NOT one of them,so please don't stop!
-
13-02-10, 23:33JAMESCORKYou know Adog you are perfectly right. I have to admit that if one has had a good experience that one is bound to give a glowing review immediately afterwards. But on the subject of bad reviews you are right. I think to wait a day or so is probably better. I have given bad reviews, and on some occasions have wondered – was I too harsh. These girls have to do their job here. I know that English Taylor found a little slump after a bad review – that was false by all accounts- but still it affected her biz. I am entitled to my opinion but should we tone it down a bit or what.. the question is out there…Quote:
Originally Posted by adogwithabone
-
15-02-10, 21:20MrFussyI was wrongAfter a lot of PMs and upon mature reflection I was wrong to withdraw from posting reviews, hence I'll start posting again. Apologies for the fuss..Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
-
15-02-10, 21:33lutherGood.......To hear..........Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
-
16-02-10, 01:29berFussWell if mr fussy isnt allowed make a fuss who is:(:(:(Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFussy
-
17-02-10, 00:20JAMESCORK
Welcome back mr Fussy. We need you man. Now get to work on some more reviews.