Hidden unpublished negative reviews?

So I was looking at an escorts profile in Dundalk (Candy Star) and noticed that she had two reviews which were both very good, then I noticed that her Would Repeat and Would Recommend were only 67%. I checked the reviews again and both reviewers Would Repeat and Would Recommend. So that means there is a third review submitted for Candy Star and it seems to be negative. Also, when you you click on the reviews of either TonyB or Light HeavyWeight you can see there is a three beside that escort.

So are E-I deliberately not publishing negative reviews of certain escorts? By the way, I noticed this earlier in the week so it's not like it was only submitted today and they were waiting to publish it.

The same is also happening with Alex in Dundalk too, but there seems to be at least two reviews missing from her page.

Hello Zoidberg,

I shall say as usually, please PM us too so that we can explain you what is happening.
No need to let your imagination run with the E-I conspiracy theories,
There is an issue with the percentage calculations, which occurred this morning and our IT team are working hard on fixing it.
There are no hidden negative reviews, just the review and percentage count went crazy.

It has been spoken about on the forums a short while ago: https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...179629-Reviews

We are expecting the fix to the issue to go live shortly.

Thank you for for your concerns,
L
X

Looks like the fix has been realised now, please have a look.
Xxx

Nope, E-I don't hide negative reviews, they just delete them :lmao:

LOL, talk about being caught red handed. LOL

I remember a review there. It wasn't (by my recollection) that negative.
It basically said what I said, that this lady's photos are photo-shopped.

are those reviews the ones they hide in the area 51 hangars?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TonyB

LOL, talk about being caught red handed. LOL

---

Have a look on the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. If its been snapped recently enough you may see originals, and put any speculation to bed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FatBastard

Have a look on the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. If its been snapped recently enough you may see originals, and put any speculation to bed.

---

How does that work?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TonyB

How does that work?

---

Copy the complete url of any website, paste it into the wayback machine and if it's trawled and saved it, the webpage will be shown exactly as it was at that date/time.

You can also manually 'snapshot' any page as it is now, and it's saved in perpetuity as it was at that very second, regardless of any editing.

For example, our beloved E-I homepage from 1999:

http://web.archive.org/web/199901250...t-ireland.com/

I had a positive one deleted once....bit unfair as it was my mam's first one and we really had a great time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FatBastard

Copy the complete url of any website, paste it into the wayback machine and if it's trawled and saved it, the webpage will be shown exactly as it was at that date/time.

You can also manually 'snapshot' any page as it is now, and it's saved in perpetuity as it was at that very second, regardless of any editing.

For example, our beloved E-I homepage from 1999:

http://web.archive.org/web/199901250...t-ireland.com/

---

Thats pretty cool. Learn something new everyday.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clubcard

Thats pretty cool. Learn something new everyday.

---

You beat me to it

Wayback only works if you go back a few years, a lot is blanked out now.

I use google cache myself to check back.