If this woman Monique Covet, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
has only one review, and she's been in Ireland at least two weeks then there's something WRONG about the review system and 'Reviewers' in general:mad:
Printable View
If this woman Monique Covet, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
has only one review, and she's been in Ireland at least two weeks then there's something WRONG about the review system and 'Reviewers' in general:mad:
The first steps are always the most difficult!
i know saw her profile and wud love to meet her...
Ric, talk to me that's a lame ass excuse-Irish clients would fuck a door knob, so being put off by 'Porn Star Escorts doesn't cut it-the REAL reason is that Irish clients don't want to see the girl making her money, and reviews help her do that; what I don't understand why be so petty and personal about someone making money they have no problems F**cking her-the reviewer said she was' booked out', so none of the rest of her clients bothered to give her reviews? Maybe if she was from a poor third-world country, fat and black, on the wrong side of ugly, and/or had children to put to school maybe reviewers might write reviews for her?
looks good alright
http://www.porn-star.com/monique_covet/01.jpg
just quoting this post but will reference a few others. I am irish but have spent many years working in London and have been with quite a few big name (to me anyway) pornstars and have never had any problem. The reason being is that I can easily see their movies or pics online, Google is a fantastic gift. Now if you search for the above escort you will see that according to the IAFD she is 33 not 28 (too old for me) and if you have a look at any of her latest pics she looks nothing like she does in her profile images, obviously a few years old.
Now, if she had been over here a couple of years ago, not a problem would of made a booking straight away, unfortunately just being a pornstar isn't good enough to demand a stream of reviews!!! Clients want honesty above anything else.
If I may strain to whisper to you in your ear as you sit on your high horse.
I have been with one Escort of the month and while she may have mercy fucked (language I do not use), I did not mercy review!
She deserves as far as I can see every recognition given.
It's the nature of the business, escorts lie about their ages whether or not they're Porn stars, now it seems that there is bias against her because she's a Porn sta,r that because she is one she most naturally assume she's going to get tons of reviews, and this is why I feel she is being treated unfairly-that Irish assumption that she assumes..
to be honest anita i think you are being a little unfair in your comments, which ones? all of them!!!
From my experience escort of the month are well earned and as for your dig at irish punters....well....i see why your no longer here!
bit bitter are you????
you are missing the point, as she is a pornstar it is very easy to get up to date info on her by simply searching with Google. When you do that you will see that not only is she older than she states (5 years) but the photos on this site are quite obviously out of date by more than 5 years (thanks Google image search). So if there are others like me that enjoy meeting pornstars then they too will do a quick search and realise that what is on offer is not exactly what is being advertised, so maybe like me they wouldn't even bother meeting her.
There are other pornstars on this site that are well reviewed IMO
i was around when gemma was here. i never met her so couldnt leave a review. the reason i never met her was because i am not into bbw escorts but i'm sure some are which is why she must have gotten so many good reviews.
i also never met you when you were here as i never found you or your profile did anything for me.
i also doubt if i will ever meet the escort you started this thread about as i too googled her and found her pics are out of date and she has lied on her profile about her age.
I'm sorry Anita but that is the biggest load of nonsense I've ever heard. So now there is a moral responsibility to review???
Anita I have 8 or 9 reviews posted about escorts who specifically asked me to review and I was happy to do so, but I general terms I just couldnt be arsed, its no reflection on the the girl and certainly in part of some ruin her earnings strategy.....
Like I said there are many other escorts who lie about their age, and many more with out of date pics Gemma? A clear case of 'Mercy review's gone wrong, and if age and out of date pics were a problem for the escort who this thread is about then why have no reviewers mentioned it? Obviously pics and age aren't the problem, the problem is she is TO COOL FOR SCHOOL:cool:
that is true but as I said you can't just do a google search for any escort on this site. The most reviewed escort here is JessicaJessy, now if you search for her the only reference you will get is from this site. If Jessica decided to keep her photos up for 7 years going a simple google search would not tell you that, hence you rely on reviews.
IMO Monique is not as busy as she maybe lets on, as it is easy to see what you see on the site is not what you get (according to Google). Two pornstars that spring to mind are Jessica Loveit and Marsha, both of these girls are very well reviewed so it must be something apart from being a pornstar that is stopping punters from reviewing Monique
Most clients won't review. Some clients will review, some won't. Some escorts get em, some don't. I should be a rapper with lyrics like that.
please STOP CHANGING THE SUBJECT, what I have said in all my threads is that Moniques current (real life) photos do not match either her age or photos on E-I, it's easy to see this (Google), so that is why punters aren't visiting her and hence the lack of reviews, simples.