Unfortunately by your post , you have ruled yourself :)
Printable View
Of course e-i is biased against ruhuma , if they had their way in the morning e-i would be shut down thus cutting off Patricia income for one and my access to very hot escorts (so i dont blame the bias ). The escorts that had good things to say about ruhama were escorts that had semi retired and wanted to get out of the industry , in the same vain that Patricia has helped out escorts that have been attacked so in this vain Mr fussy posts about both organisations having the same goal is true but they both do it in their own individual way
Also my last post on this but I think I must qualify a comment as I do appreciate your views......
I do not agree with some of Ruhamas' aims...they have their own agenda as Don says but so do EI...and I think a critique of one organisation from another that has its own issues is disappointing...hence my whiter than white reference...
We can add it to the list of topics to discuss over dinner one day:-)
Bumpity bump. Read it and weep, Ruhama. There are such things as independent escorts who like doing what they do.
Actually Mr. Fussy it was a bit non-sequitur of you to introduce your proposition that "EI is not whiter than white and therefore should not comment on the intentions of Ruhama". If you wished to take issue at all then you should have refuted some of the specific assertions made about Ruhama in the originial post eg. its origins in religious orders associated with the Magdalene Laundries, its hi-jacking by the larger Catholic Church organisation to further a blanket agenda of demonising sexuality, y'know proper actual argument as opposed to mere fallacy.
I don't know much about the work of Ruhama. In the most general terms I have no problem with a support network to assist girls and women coerced or suborned into prostitution however I have, over the last couple of years, had the scales removed from my eyes regarding Catholic dogma and scripture in general and I am deeply suspicious of the over-all intent of Ruhama as an organisation.
Of course. Despite showing a great taste in escorts Mr. Fussy has been largely discredited as a serious poster on E-I for a long time anyway. He even claimed to have been some sort of hotshot "lawyer" or legal eagle or something, and yet seemed to make basic errors when talking about such things, that even people here were able to point out.... Who knows how he was able to afford it originally.... there are all sorts of ways that people end up with a large amount of money only to blow it all later pretending to live the high life for a while.
Even though this thread was bumped with good intentions this time, I still don't think it should be bumped like that out of the blue. Brock, please note that it's advised not to bump old threads here without a very compelling reason.
Your attitude towards moderators and to suggestions is horse shit.
We all agreed before that bumping old threads without an exceptional reason is a bad thing: rude, annoying, misleading. This is also the case for all other forums. It has nothing to do with mods.
Check my post, I modified it.
Honestly Brock, I think you should get an actual clue about E-I before you come in here prancing around like you know everything. You only registered in March 2011, why not listen to people who are here a lot longer than you are. Oh and I wouldn't consider a vote of support from Lucy as being worth much as she would back up anyone that was arguing against me.
I am not going to reply to this again.