PDA

View Full Version : Longford Council becomes a second lapdog for TORL



Masculine
20-07-12, 19:14
http://www.thejournal.ie/longford-council-prostitution-law-sex-526157-Jul2012/

I notice they didn't mention any of the Councillors names who approved this motion, presumably because they know they will be voted out of office during the next local elections. Like the NCCRI, Denise Charlton is aware of the impending funding cuts for her organization. So like the NCCRI, she needs to do all she can before the organization folds.

The only question is whether Alan Shatter will make the wrong decision. Just like the decriminalization of homosexuality in 1993, I envisage the decriminalization of prostitution when the next government wins power. The current government is extremely unpopular at present and shrinking.

Half Man and Half Dildo
22-07-12, 19:22
“It could not be more timely as it coincides with the first opportunity in years to change the law and help put people traffickers, pimps and other criminals out of business,” she said.

so wot wot denise charlton says above i am a criminal, so wot exactly is my crime
are they intending to make all people who have sex out of wedlock criminals to?

god its so nice to loose you human rights as soon as you put on stockings

Denise Charlton and her ilk would have a much harder time persuading politicians to do their bidding if the ladies of E-I would take advantage of such articles to publicly refute TORL's claims. The article has been live since Friday on the Journal's site, at present it has 49 comments not one of which is from anyone who identifies themselves as a sex worker. Since Masculine posted the link here it has received 257 views. I wonder how many of those viewers were escorts?

Half Man and Half Dildo
22-07-12, 21:24
i wanted to write a comment but it will only let me comment if i sign into my facebook or twitter account which i can not do

so wot do you suggest

Thanks Kelly, are these accounts you have on Facebook and Twitter for your work as KellyCurvyBabe or for personal use? If they're for KellyCurvybabe why can't you use one of those to log in. Or am I missing something?

toya
22-07-12, 21:36
they say that want to stop pimps and trafficking which i think is a brilliant idea. But i think its going to push the sex trade totally underground and make it maybe dangerous for the true indie escorts. At the end of the day they will never stop the sex industry as this is the longest proffession in the book from decades. And instead of pushing it underground they should make more help available for pimped girls to get away from there pimps. Because if some one want to exploit some one to make money they will any way at any cost. this new law will cause more problems instead of helping it.

Banjaxed
22-07-12, 21:38
Mmmmm....human rights and stockings in the one sentence :hypnotized:

This is motion is to be circulated to all local authorities and it's one of those ideal motions that needs absolutely no debate to get passed because it simply makes a nice little sound bite in the local newspapers for each Councillor to pontificate and say a few words (that they only learned a few minutes beforehand) about the evil of human trafficking taking place in "every town and village in the country".

I wonder how it would go if SWAI actually did something for a change and lobbied every local authority with a counter-motion defending aimed at defending the right to choice of independent sex workers.

Half Man and Half Dildo
22-07-12, 22:03
they say that want to stop pimps and trafficking which i think is a brilliant idea..........

If there wasn't a single pimp, brothel, trafficked woman, or underaged prostitute they would still be campaigning against the sex industry.

toya
22-07-12, 22:20
good comment babes and its totally true.

Jack in the Box
22-07-12, 22:53
Considering the huge amount of people in the country that are against the criminalising of clients of sex workers you'd think that at the very least these boneheaded councillors would hedge their bets and try to see the two sides of the debate.

the traveller
23-07-12, 08:41
Considering the huge amount of people in the country that are against the criminalising of clients of sex workers you'd think that at the very least these boneheaded councillors would hedge their bets and try to see the two sides of the debate.

The problem is that when these debates are heard there is no one from the pro lobby there so the anti coalition have a clear field to propagate their distortion of the truth. This is why it is so important that escorts make a submission to the department of justice, one word from an independent escort is worth a thousand of mine.

Jack in the Box
24-07-12, 18:12
You're dead right The Traveller. It would be very difficult for anybody to dismiss what they say so any escort out there please do a submission.

toya
28-07-12, 19:59
Yes your right as an escort i think i will make a submission. Because of the end of the day i am a woman and it's my body and i can chose want i want to do with it, I'm not going to be dictated to with what is morally right. OMG this is the 21st century and times have changed even in the bible prostitution was in it. This isn't just about stopping victims and pimps, its purely because they have not moved with the times and are very small mind and with there religious believe's. But this will have a knock on effect with escorts scared to report crimes and ass holes taking advantage of the situation. So yes i am going to make a submission and i think more escorts should we need are voice to be heard. Because i'm not going to stop what i'm doing and being dictated to by a bunch of idiots. We should all stick together.

toya
28-07-12, 20:16
I have put in a submission now :cool:

Buachaillbeag
03-08-12, 07:33
I'd imagine many of those councillors blow their expenses on escorts!
councils can't do much about escorts or prostitution.
The only thing people care about is our economy

copperslad
04-10-12, 08:17
Dead right!