LaBelleThatcher
19-05-12, 21:09
You know, Ruhama might have even got to me with this one:
http://theprostitutionexperience.com/?p=78
A few weeks ago, before they let me have a ringside seat at how unscrupulous, childish and spiteful they can be, to *me* let alone to others...provided they said it straight out and honestly, of course, instead of wrapping it up in a synthetic "purrostitute persona" they created to be manipulative, they honestly might have even got to me except for two things:
First thing:
If you are a sexworker, for any reason, and somebody offers you an opportunity of some kind that is genuinely better for you, I am absolutely certain that you will have the good sense and intelligence to choose to cease to be a sex worker without legalised coercion.
So why the need for legalised coercion at all? If you cannot offer a sex worker an alternative that is better for her than sex work what is the point in harassing her and making her life more difficult? What does society actually get out of being drawn into that kind of senseless bullying?
Second thing:
Here it comes again:
Yes, those paying to use the bodies of women and teenagers who submit and comply through a lack of any real choice should be guilty of a criminal offence. The criminalisation of the demand for prostitution is an important start;
Either everybody who pays to use people who submit and comply through a lack of any real choice *FOR ANY PURPOSE* is to be guilty of the same criminal offence, or nobody is. You cannot have it both ways.
There is also another problem. A lot of intelligent adults who seem perfectly sane and self aware to me, are telling me that they choose sex work freely. So how will the law make a distinction between sex workers who have no real choice, and sex workers who choose freely? For example, how do you classify paying a sex worker who (like a lot of people) has no real choice but hang on to the job she has like grim death because of the recession, but, if she *did* have more choices, would probably still choose sex work?
...and no, I am sorry, taking the word of an organisation that the majority of sex workers refuse to have anything to do with, run by people who have never been sex workers, and have never knowingly met a client for how sex workers feel, or what sex workers want, or even for what clients are like and deserve is *NOT* a solution.
I am an adult, and I have been an adult for longer than most of those working for Ruhama have even been alive. I am quite sure I know a great deal more about sex work and clients than they ever will.
Ruhama DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME.
http://theprostitutionexperience.com/?p=78
A few weeks ago, before they let me have a ringside seat at how unscrupulous, childish and spiteful they can be, to *me* let alone to others...provided they said it straight out and honestly, of course, instead of wrapping it up in a synthetic "purrostitute persona" they created to be manipulative, they honestly might have even got to me except for two things:
First thing:
If you are a sexworker, for any reason, and somebody offers you an opportunity of some kind that is genuinely better for you, I am absolutely certain that you will have the good sense and intelligence to choose to cease to be a sex worker without legalised coercion.
So why the need for legalised coercion at all? If you cannot offer a sex worker an alternative that is better for her than sex work what is the point in harassing her and making her life more difficult? What does society actually get out of being drawn into that kind of senseless bullying?
Second thing:
Here it comes again:
Yes, those paying to use the bodies of women and teenagers who submit and comply through a lack of any real choice should be guilty of a criminal offence. The criminalisation of the demand for prostitution is an important start;
Either everybody who pays to use people who submit and comply through a lack of any real choice *FOR ANY PURPOSE* is to be guilty of the same criminal offence, or nobody is. You cannot have it both ways.
There is also another problem. A lot of intelligent adults who seem perfectly sane and self aware to me, are telling me that they choose sex work freely. So how will the law make a distinction between sex workers who have no real choice, and sex workers who choose freely? For example, how do you classify paying a sex worker who (like a lot of people) has no real choice but hang on to the job she has like grim death because of the recession, but, if she *did* have more choices, would probably still choose sex work?
...and no, I am sorry, taking the word of an organisation that the majority of sex workers refuse to have anything to do with, run by people who have never been sex workers, and have never knowingly met a client for how sex workers feel, or what sex workers want, or even for what clients are like and deserve is *NOT* a solution.
I am an adult, and I have been an adult for longer than most of those working for Ruhama have even been alive. I am quite sure I know a great deal more about sex work and clients than they ever will.
Ruhama DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME.