LaBelleThatcher
14-05-12, 11:11
Launched today:
http://www.ruhama.ie/page.php?intPageID=244
As you will immediately note, they are now adopting the term "purrostitution" made famous by Paul Connolly, and their emphasis has shifted away from demanding legal changes aimed at taking away the income of sex workers in a recession, when there is little or no chance of anyone who loses their job finding another one in any kind of hurry.
Now they are just demanding money. Money that they mostly spend on salaries and premises for themselves, junketing affiliated NGOs in pricey locations and lobbying against the expressed wishes and best interests of sex workers.
Some might feel that the ad, in itself, could be considered to be in appalling bad taste coming on to of changes to social welfare legislation that will force single parents back into the workplace as soon as their child is 7. There are few, if any, jobs, and no affordable childcare (7 is way too young to be left unsupervised for even a few minutes) with the result that many more women will find themselves with no option but "the purrostitution" for the same reason they used to in the recession of the 90s...because it was the only possible way to afford reasonable childcare. It is a lot cheaper and easier to get a good babysitter in for two evenings a week and sell sex. Than to get full time daycare and a full time job. In many cases the true cost of daytime childcare would wipe out most or all of the wages.
Ruhama do not like anyone mentioning the realities of the childcare factor, because it is not something they can even pretend to do anything about, but it was once the single biggest factor driving women into sex work, and very soon will be again.
...of course, the psychological damage of being "re-educated" by an organisation as fanatical and hypocritical as Ruhama must be incalculable...
http://www.ruhama.ie/page.php?intPageID=244
As you will immediately note, they are now adopting the term "purrostitution" made famous by Paul Connolly, and their emphasis has shifted away from demanding legal changes aimed at taking away the income of sex workers in a recession, when there is little or no chance of anyone who loses their job finding another one in any kind of hurry.
Now they are just demanding money. Money that they mostly spend on salaries and premises for themselves, junketing affiliated NGOs in pricey locations and lobbying against the expressed wishes and best interests of sex workers.
Some might feel that the ad, in itself, could be considered to be in appalling bad taste coming on to of changes to social welfare legislation that will force single parents back into the workplace as soon as their child is 7. There are few, if any, jobs, and no affordable childcare (7 is way too young to be left unsupervised for even a few minutes) with the result that many more women will find themselves with no option but "the purrostitution" for the same reason they used to in the recession of the 90s...because it was the only possible way to afford reasonable childcare. It is a lot cheaper and easier to get a good babysitter in for two evenings a week and sell sex. Than to get full time daycare and a full time job. In many cases the true cost of daytime childcare would wipe out most or all of the wages.
Ruhama do not like anyone mentioning the realities of the childcare factor, because it is not something they can even pretend to do anything about, but it was once the single biggest factor driving women into sex work, and very soon will be again.
...of course, the psychological damage of being "re-educated" by an organisation as fanatical and hypocritical as Ruhama must be incalculable...