View Full Version : Patty
We have suspected that Patty has been involved in a number of issues and after looking into matters, we have decided to ban her account for several reasons:
- We know for a fact that someone had access to her account and had been quoting content from the private forums, hence the restricition of her account from the escort private forums. Since restricting her account, this activity had ceased. Patty contacted me on three seperate occasions to ask why her account was restricted, despite clear explainations and an acknowlegment of understanding
- I have found that Patty had a secondary profile used a while ago and the same person had reviewed her under both profiles (69lover). This user has also been banned
- Patty's name was mentioned alongside Cindy Forever and Kamila during the Escort of the Month fix
- We have reason to believe that other banned escorts are accessing her account
There will naturally be people surprised and will not agree with this decision, but unfortunately this is the decision that has been made. We have had our suspicions for a while now and finally we are now in a position to bring this matter to a close.
carlos marvado
13-11-11, 11:32
Seems like an investigation has been concluded and a little ring busted. Giving others access to her account and therefore access to the private forum also, posting content from said private forum, use of a secondary profile for purposes other than comedy, and faking reviews in order to fix Escort of the Month......quite a charge sheet.
I wonder if anything will crawl out from under a rock to try and defend these sharp practices.
Well done in conducting this investigation and bringing the findings to the members' attention.
Sad really, some supposedly nice genuine folk smiling to your face while they as good as stab you in the back :sad:
Sad really, some supposedly nice genuine folk smiling to your face while they as good as stab you in the back :sad:
seems to be a lot of that going on alright. you just don't know who you can trust really. very sad indeed.
I've also been looking into master69's reviews and it seems that he's been posting from the same location as Patty. He has also been banned.
We have suspected that Patty has been involved in a number of issues and after looking into matters, we have decided to ban her account for several reasons:
- We know for a fact that someone had access to her account and had been quoting content from the private forums, hence the restricition of her account from the escort private forums. Since restricting her account, this activity had ceased. Patty contacted me on three seperate occasions to ask why her account was restricted, despite clear explainations and an acknowlegment of understanding
- I have found that Patty had a secondary profile used a while ago and the same person had reviewed her under both profiles (69lover). This user has also been banned
- Patty's name was mentioned alongside Cindy Forever and Kamila during the Escort of the Month fix
- We have reason to believe that other banned escorts are accessing her account
There will naturally be people surprised and will not agree with this decision, but unfortunately this is the decision that has been made. We have had our suspicions for a while now and finally we are now in a position to bring this matter to a close.
I am one of the people that will not agree with this decision, but I'm not surprised, as I was aware of a
potential problem about a month ago when I queried the absence of Patty's heart symbol on her profile.
Before I make any further comment on the subject of Patty's banning and the allegations raised above,
I would be interested to know the name of the secondary profile that you mention in relation to 69lover,
as I have looked through his reviews and cannot find a match.
I've also been looking into master69's reviews and it seems that he's been posting from the same location as Patty. He has also been banned.
Master69 has plenty of reviews of other very popular escorts. Are they all going to be investigated or just some of them?
I am one of the people that will not agree with this decision, but I'm not surprised, as I was aware of a
potential problem about a month ago when I queried the absence of Patty's heart symbol on her profile.
Before I make any further comment on the subject of Patty's banning and the allegations raised above,
I would be interested to know the name of the secondary profile that you mention in relation to 69lover,
as I have looked through his reviews and cannot find a match.
Certainly, the name of the profile was Sweet Carol. I've had a telephone conversation with Patty already and there was no denial on her part.
Certainly, the name of the profile was Sweet Carol. I've had a telephone conversation with Patty already and there was no denial on her part.
I cannot find a profile for Sweet Carol, but I can see Carol Massage, who is still getting reviews. Is this who you mean :confused:
I also added a question about Master69, but you answered my initial one at the same time as I was editing it.
Seems like an investigation has been concluded and a little ring busted. Giving others access to her account and therefore access to the private forum also, posting content from said private forum, use of a secondary profile for purposes other than comedy, and faking reviews in order to fix Escort of the Month......quite a charge sheet.
I wonder if anything will crawl out from under a rock to try and defend these sharp practices.
Well done in conducting this investigation and bringing the findings to the members' attention.
Brother Carlos, tis me, crawling out of the rock...I don't agree with this banning until there is a post from Patty or any other banned member for that matter.(but that won't happen because their accounts are already banned)
I agree investigations were done, for all the matters not only now, but there is no explanation from the 'guilty' party. Yes, EI staff are doing their job but is not a democratic society we live in, in this day and age.
Everything we read comes from the decision taken by EI, if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in very good way(I think).
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 13:49
Brother Carlos, tis me, crawling out of the rock...I don't agree with this banning until there is a post from Patty or any other banned member for that matter.(but that won't happen because their accounts are already banned)
I agree investigations were done, for all the matters not only now, but there is no explanation from the 'guilty' party. Yes, EI staff are doing their job but is not a democratic society we live in, in this day and age.
Everything we read comes from the decision taken by EI, if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in very good way(I think).
In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?
ChiefHandker
13-11-11, 13:54
Brother Carlos, tis me, crawling out of the rock...I don't agree with this banning until there is a post from Patty or any other banned member for that matter.(but that won't happen because their accounts are already banned)
I agree investigations were done, for all the matters not only now, but there is no explanation from the 'guilty' party. Yes, EI staff are doing their job but is not a democratic society we live in, in this day and age.
Everything we read comes from the decision taken by EI, if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in very good way(I think).
I don't really understand your post. This isn't an episode of Scooby Doo where the guilty party comes out and say they would've gotten away with it had it not been for those meddlin' kids at E-I and then go on to explain themselves. I don't think E-I would ban a few of their paying advertisers without proper evidence or just on a hunch, do you? And in any case, banned members obviously can't post as yo know.
As for fixing of reviews probably being more widespread... well of course. But just because it happens far more than can be proven doesn't mean that action shouldn't be taken when it is proven.
Amy Alison
13-11-11, 13:57
In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?
Exactly. In any situation this charge alone would be enough to grant a ban for any escort.
I don't really understand your post. This isn't an episode of Scooby Doo where the guilty party comes out and say they would've gotten away with it had it not been for those meddlin' kids at E-I and then go on to explain themselves. I don't think E-I would ban a few of their paying advertisers without proper evidence or just on a hunch, do you? And in any case, banned members obviously can't post as yo know.
As for fixing of reviews probably being more widespread... well of course. But just because it happens far more than can be proven doesn't mean that action shouldn't be taken when it is proven.
Ah yeah, but they can still advertise, EI will still take their adverts, and say we don' want to ruin their lively hood. I watch a lot Scooby Doo episodes as well.!
Just an opinion for what it may be worth. If banning is the punishment for serious breaches (correctly if proven) of the rules should the accused/guilty party not be given some time to publicly defend themselves before the ban takes effect? Most especially in the case of an Escort who depends heavily on the boards to conduct their business.
In light of recent events (banned members) I think it would limit speculation etc. and people could make a more accurate judgement on the decision taken.
I know that memers have strong feelings about people accused of "cheating" the system and understand that fully.
Just a thought
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 14:25
Ah yeah, but they can still advertise, EI will still take their adverts, and say we don' want to ruin their lively hood. I watch a lot Scooby Doo episodes as well.!
And that is how it should be. What they won't be allowed to do is access our forum, have their husbands leave reviews or PM clients requesting fake reviews.
As it should be, no?
In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?
I haven't seen any proof. This is what Samlad posted.
- We know for a fact that someone had access to her account and had been quoting content from the private forums, hence the restricition of her account from the escort private forums. Since restricting her account, this activity had ceased. Patty contacted me on three seperate occasions to ask why her account was restricted, despite clear explainations and an acknowlegment of understanding
- We have reason to believe that other banned escorts are accessing her account
We have had our suspicions for a while now and finally we are now in a position to bring this matter to a close.
Who is the 'someone', and where were they quoting content from the private forum?
What 'activity' ceased?
What banned users are accessing her account, and how does E-I know that, unless they are in the room with them at the time?
Call me naive if you like, but this doesn't add up. I have met Patty and I think she is a very genuine person,
and I'm not some gullible young fella looking for brownie points.
Just an opinion for what it may be worth. If banning is the punishment for serious breaches (correctly if proven) of the rules should the accused/guilty party not be given some time to publicly defend themselves before the ban takes effect? Most especially in the case of an Escort who depends heavily on the boards to conduct their business.
In light of recent events (banned members) I think it would limit speculation etc. and people could make a more accurate judgement on the decision taken.
I know that memers have strong feelings about people accused of "cheating" the system and understand that fully.
Just a thought
Well, we wouldn't ban anyone unless we were sure, and trust me; we get enough phone calls from guilty parties to try and explain themselves after these sorts of events anyway. Many phone calls.
In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?
Exactly. In any situation this charge alone would be enough to grant a ban for any escort.
I understand your concerns, but Sam mentioned someone else/banned user accessed her account. Does this mean she is guilty? Why didn't EI give a new user account? Are some popular escorts trying to get her banned?
Public/private forums, the information is there to see/shown to anyone, if there was access. So by looking at it and saying/showing this information to another person, it's wrong?
Lucy, with all due respect, I don't want to argue with you because I'm not good in arguments but why start this thread>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/showthread.php?t=78647, by saying ''Are escorts requesting bans now?''.
On post number 4, you said ''you didn't notice the other thread'', so why/how did you come to a theory that Patty is looking for a 'self-ban', if you didn't know about this thread >> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/showthread.php?t=78646, even though you admit on the post having not seen the second thread I mentioned?
I haven't seen any proof. This is what Samlad posted.
Who is the 'someone', and where were they quoting content from the private forum?
What activity 'ceased'?
What banned users are accessing her account, and how does E-I know that, unless they are in the room with them at the time?
Call me naive if you like, but this doesn't add up. I have met Patty and I think she is a very genuine person,
and I'm not some gullible young fella looking for brownie points.
I can understand that you're not satisfied with the outcome of this situation, but it doesn't change the fact that Patty's profile had a number of major issues. As for proof, I've already outlined the details, and it would be silly of me to get into the particulars. Why educate people on how to evade detection?
I would say that if she was genuine in your eyes, that's up to you. I just think she's a good service provider if that's the case. I am genuinely sorry that you are disappointed (or furious), but no everyone is what they seem to be.
I wonder if anything will crawl out from under a rock to try and defend these sharp practices.
That quite frankly is an outrageous statement
I understand your concerns, but Sam mentioned someone else/banned user accessed her account. Does this mean she is guilty? Why didn't EI give a new user account? Are some popular escorts trying to get her banned?
Public/private forums, the information is there to see/shown to anyone, if there was access. So by looking at it and saying/showing this information to another person, it's wrong?
Lucy, with all due respect, I don't want to argue with you because I'm not good in arguments but why start this thread>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/showthread.php?t=78647, by saying ''Are escorts requesting bans now?''.
On post number 4, you said ''you didn't notice the other thread'', so why/how did you come to a theory that an escort is looking for a 'self-ban', if you didn't know about this thread >> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/showthread.php?t=78646, even though you admit on the post having not seen the second thread I mentioned?
If you're not good at arguing, you are probably arguing the wrong side of the toss. Sure, why not give all banned users another account to give access to people that shouldn't be in there? If someone thinks that another person has access to their account, report it and change your password. These people wouldn't have access to these accounts if they didn't have the passwords.
We will protect the escort forums all we can; escort security comes before anything else because escorts can become very vulnerable if some of the information in these forums is accessed. Allowing others to access an account will not be tollerated.
Well, we wouldn't ban anyone unless we were sure, and trust me; we get enough phone calls from guilty parties to try and explain themselves after these sorts of events anyway. Many phone calls.
Sam, with all due respect, I'm sure you have done your investigations, etc and came to a conclusion but have this as a thought
Client visits a lady, get the service he wants etc. Was Happy and want to leave a review, he/she might ask lady for the use of her computer/laptop to do review. This registers the Ip being shared by client and lady. So just because of a shared Ip this is wrong? Oh and I know people who don't post but leaving reviews banned because they use the same Ip, maybe they were house mates, using same wifi/internet cafe facility?
All I would like to highlight is there are flaws of the review system which EI could look into, but weilding an axe just for shared Ip is a bit over board. Which make me say this, the main problem is THE ESCORT OF THE MONTH prize!
saoirsemac
13-11-11, 14:47
I can understand that you're not satisfied with the outcome of this situation, but it doesn't change the fact that Patty's profile had a number of major issues. As for proof, I've already outlined the details, and it would be silly of me to get into the particulars. Why educate people on how to evade detection?
I would say that if she was genuine in your eyes, that's up to you. I just think she's a good service provider if that's the case. I am genuinely sorry that you are disappointed (or furious), but no everyone is what they seem to be.
well done sam and the guys in ei!
i have not posted in awhile but feel i wanted to thank u for this!
too all the gentlemen here hyping up!
our forums are private and alot of info is past in them
its comming to the point its hard to trust the info and or expose any information u know
for fear of rebuttal on it!
i too got pms quoting my post form the private forums it was not nice
our forums are not there for the crack and banter, but for serious issues
showing them too anyone in my opioion is a complete kick in the face to your fellow escort!
i for one wud never show them to anyone, even to an escort who did not have the same privalages as me!
its wrong!
all you lads standing on ur soap boxes here for patty need to get a grip
she cheated and got caught and worse she betrayed other escorts!
fixing miss ei fake reviews etc ffs she be proven guilty like! just coz she hot dnt mean she innocent
just coz she was all o baby i like u too ur face dont make her innocent!
i do however wish patty cindy and kamilla the best of luck and hope they stay safe!
but what they did was wrong and they deserve there punishment
its not fair to the geniue hard working escorts out there! for example me bbw alot wnt review me as its againist there norm do i stoop to underhanded activites such as this? no
the whole escort of the month thing i really cud not give a flying fuck about it
ill never win it nor do i care
and btw wolfie the boards is less than 10per cent of ur business they will surive me thinks!!
If you're not good at arguing, you are probably arguing the wrong side of the toss. Sure, why not give all banned users another account to give access to people that shouldn't be in there? If someone thinks that another person has access to their account, report it and change your password. These people wouldn't have access to these accounts if they didn't have the passwords.
We will protect the escort forums all we can; escort security comes before anything else because escorts can become very vulnerable if some of the information in these forums is accessed. Allowing others to access an account will not be tollerated.
Toss or no toss, you are thinking of protecting escort, which I agree but as I've said in my post, all the information is out there to be seen, it won't stop any one reading it.
To be honest, I think some ladies don't want Patty to access the private forums because they worry that she will pass on information to Cindy about what other ladies 'said' regarding her.
Sam, with all due respect, I'm sure you have done your investigations, etc and came to a conclusion but have this as a thought
Client visits a lady, get the service he wants etc. Was Happy and want to leave a review, he/she might ask lady for the use of her computer/laptop to do review. This registers the Ip being shared by client and lady. So just because of a shared Ip this is wrong? Oh and I know people who don't post but leaving reviews banned because they use the same Ip, maybe they were house mates, using same wifi/internet cafe facility?
All I would like to highlight is there are flaws of the review system which EI could look into, but weilding an axe just for shared Ip is a bit over board. Which make me say this, the main problem is THE ESCORT OF THE MONTH prize!
These things are obviously considered. I'm not going to go into details about things, as I have said a few times already, but we wouldn't have banned Patty if we weren't sure. Besides, there are several factors involved here.
Toss or no toss, you are thinking of protecting escort, which I agree but as I've said in my post, all the information is out there to be seen, it won't stop any one reading it.
To be honest, I think some ladies don't want Patty to access the private forums because they worry that she will pass on information to Cindy about what other ladies 'said' regarding her.
One would wonder why certain ladies would be worried about this.
and btw wolfie the boards is less than 10per cent of ur business
I did not know that, now I do ....... fair point
I did not know that, now I do ....... fair point
It's less than 5% I would say actually.
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 15:00
I understand your concerns, but Sam mentioned someone else/banned user accessed her account. Does this mean she is guilty? Why didn't EI give a new user account? Are some popular escorts trying to get her banned?
Public/private forums, the information is there to see/shown to anyone, if there was access. So by looking at it and saying/showing this information to another person, it's wrong?
Lucy, with all due respect, I don't want to argue with you because I'm not good in arguments but why start this thread>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/showthread.php?t=78647, by saying ''Are escorts requesting bans now?''.
On post number 4, you said ''you didn't notice the other thread'', so why/how did you come to a theory that Patty is looking for a 'self-ban', if you didn't know about this thread >> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/showthread.php?t=78646, even though you admit on the post having not seen the second thread I mentioned?
Perhaps you should look at the times of my posts. They are self explanatory.
We have known for sometime there was a leak on our forum, you don't have any right to know what was leaked. Suffice to say after readings Sams post that confirmed something for me.
As to popular escorts trying to get people banned, ask management if any escort had input into this investigation. Then please feel free to apologise at leasure.
saoirsemac
13-11-11, 15:02
Toss or no toss, you are thinking of protecting escort, which I agree but as I've said in my post, all the information is out there to be seen, it won't stop any one reading it.
To be honest, I think some ladies don't want Patty to access the private forums because they worry that she will pass on information to Cindy about what other ladies 'said' regarding her.
just fyi our private forums did not discuss cindy banning more than shock of it!
there was no bad mouthing done
she made a very silly mistake thats it! and deserved her banning
despite what all ye boys think we are not jealous little escorts
we have our buisness to worry and care about thanks!
saoirsemac
13-11-11, 15:03
It's less than 5% I would say actually.
will we say 7.5% lol meet u half way lol
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 15:03
One would wonder why certain ladies would be worried about this.
One would also wonder how a client became so convinced of this. it isn't only the ladies who protest too much.
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 15:08
just fyi our private forums did not discuss cindy banning more than shock of it!
there was no bad mouthing done
she made a very silly mistake thats it! and deserved her banning
despite what all ye boys think we are not jealous little escorts
we have our buisness to worry and care about thanks!
It isn't those posts that have been leaked. We are under no obligation to discuss our forum here. Far too many clients has access to it already.
One would also wonder how a client became so convinced of this. it isn't only the ladies who protest too much.
I can understand that people want a 'definate'. We can't give a definate, not through a lack of evidence, but more so because of the nature of things. Escorts are in a sense actors or actresses. The nature of the business is anonymous. You have to expect a few porkie pies and tall tales to help massage the ego. Quite often (as said before) clients get too involved with escorts and then a great big pile of mess occurs, and then E-I have to mop it up and be held accountable for it.
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 15:15
I can understand that people want a 'definate'. We can't give a definate, not through a lack of evidence, but more so because of the nature of things. Escorts are in a sense actors or actresses. The nature of the business is anonymous. You have to expect a few porkie pies and tall tales to help massage the ego. Quite often (as said before) clients get too involved with escorts and then a great big pile of mess occurs, and then E-I have to mop it up and be held accountable for it.
Oh, I understand that Sam. I find it highly disturbing that people would think that any escort would try and get another banned, but let's face it. That's the only petty thing left to think. Accepting there was a problem is obviously too hard to take for some, and I don't think we should have our forum tiers exposed to satisfy anyones curiosity.
Oh, I understand that Sam. I find it highly disturbing that people would think that any escort would try and get another banned, but let's face it. That's the only petty thing left to think. Accepting there was a problem is obviously too hard to take for some, and I don't think we should have our forum tiers exposed to satisfy anyones curiosity.
I agree. I think there has been more than enough explanation and there is a simple choice; believe it or don't believe it. It doesn't change anything anyway.
I can understand that you're not satisfied with the outcome of this situation, but it doesn't change the fact that Patty's profile had a number of major issues. As for proof, I've already outlined the details, and it would be silly of me to get into the particulars. Why educate people on how to evade detection?
I would say that if she was genuine in your eyes, that's up to you. I just think she's a good service provider if that's the case. I am genuinely sorry that you are disappointed (or furious), but no everyone is what they seem to be.
I am not looking for you to 'educate' anyone on how to evade detection.
You could pm me the answers, unless you don't trust me either. Then again, who can anyone on the internet really trust.?
I asked some other questions and I haven't received a reply.
I cannot find a profile for Sweet Carol, but I can see Carol Massage, who is still getting reviews. Is this who you mean :confused:
I also added a question about Master69, but you answered my initial one at the same time as I was editing it.
I am not looking for you to 'educate' anyone on how to evade detection.
You could pm me the answers, unless you don't trust me either. Then again, who can anyone on the internet really trust.?
I asked some other questions and I haven't received a reply.
Sweet Carol: https://www.escort-ireland.com/18103/SweetCarol/irish-escort.html
The reviews are suspended as they are duplicate.
Quite surprisingly, her pictures have suddenly 'vanished' since this investigation, however I did take the liberty of taking a screen shot:
http://i.imgur.com/MxSRO.jpg
For obvious reasons, I won't include the verification picture.
Ah yeah, but they can still advertise, EI will still take their adverts, and say we don' want to ruin their lively hood. I watch a lot Scooby Doo episodes as well.!
Whats the alternative? They would just make a new profile and get access to the private section again.
That quite frankly is an outrageous statement
It's also an ironic one considering he had his own rock to crawl out from when he was a wannabe pimp. I was offered 'accommodation' from him. He didnt say outright that it was in exchange for sex but that's definitely what was implied. I already knew about him from other girls so I didn't bother getting back to him. I have kept this under my hat for a long long time but frankly I am sick of seeing swamp dwellers on these boards acting all outraged at the actions of others.
Toss or no toss, you are thinking of protecting escort, which I agree but as I've said in my post, all the information is out there to be seen, it won't stop any one reading it.
To be honest, I think some ladies don't want Patty to access the private forums because they worry that she will pass on information to Cindy about what other ladies 'said' regarding her.
How absolutely fucking ridiculous. We have plenty things to talk about and Cindy, whoever she is (I am serious, who is she?) aint one of them.
I agree. I think there has been more than enough explanation and there is a simple choice; believe it or don't believe it. It doesn't change anything anyway.
Sam. May I just ask why explanations are expected and given. I have never seen explanations and details given on other boards and I have been using them for 8 years. Frankly, what management does regarding the boards and its members is nobody's business. If you feel a banning has to be announced fair enough, but an explanation to anyone who demands it? Tell em to fuck off.
I am not looking for you to 'educate' anyone on how to evade detection.
You could pm me the answers, unless you don't trust me either. Then again, who can anyone on the internet really trust.?
I asked some other questions and I haven't received a reply.
With respect Forrest. Why is this any of your business? Does it affect your life?
One would wonder why certain ladies would be worried about this.
For obvious reasons.
Perhaps you should look at the times of my posts. They are self explanatory.
We have known for sometime there was a leak on our forum, you don't have any right to know what was leaked. Suffice to say after readings Sams post that confirmed something for me.
As to popular escorts trying to get people banned, ask management if any escort had input into this investigation. Then please feel free to apologise at leasure.
I don't need to know what was leaked in the private forums, it's only for escorts to know.
As for your comment which I highlighted, from being sensible I know for myself it happens, because the industry is such. Even if I asked, there won;t be an answer but the truth is out there.
just fyi our private forums did not discuss cindy banning more than shock of it!
there was no bad mouthing done
she made a very silly mistake thats it! and deserved her banning
despite what all ye boys think we are not jealous little escorts
we have our buisness to worry and care about thanks!
Thanks for the information Saoirse, but that's your private forum, so you shouldn't say what you discuss in it here.
Whats the alternative? They would just make a new profile and get access to the private section again.
Maybe they will, who knows?
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 17:35
[/B]
I don't need to know what was leaked in the private forums, it's only for escorts to know.
As for your comment which I highlighted, from being sensible I know for myself it happens, because the industry is such. Even if I asked, there won;t be an answer but the truth is out there.
You haven't got a leg to stand on, and your vicious little innuendo only serves to make you look more suspect. As I would imagine you have met the lady concerned though, perhaps you can explain what her pictures are doing on another profile.
Truth is out there? Yup, and an awful lot of deranged conspiracy theorists too.
How absolutely fucking ridiculous. We have plenty things to talk about and Cindy, whoever she is (I am serious, who is she?) aint one of them.
I didn't say it was you.
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 17:38
Maybe they will, who knows?
They won't. I'm wondering why you are so concerned dear.
You haven't got a leg to stand on, and your vicious little innuendo only serves to make you look more suspect. As I would imagine you have met the lady concerned though, perhaps you can explain what her pictures are doing on another profile.
Truth is out there? Yup, and an awful lot of deranged conspiracy theorists too.
I can be a suspect to anyone here, I don't really care. Anyone from EI staff can check my IP address and do whatever they want, and I'm not using any software to hide my IP.
As for her pictures doing on another profile, how would I know if it was her or not, except for what Sam has said. But I still have my 2 legs to stand on.
If you feel a banning has to be announced fair enough, but an explanation to anyone who demands it? Tell em to fuck off.
An interesting attitude from someone who often looks for explanations for certain actions herself.
I don't have any examples and I couldn't be arsed going looking for any either.
With respect Forrest. Why is this any of your business? Does it affect your life?
With respect, Heather, I am entitled to ask questions in the same way you are.
I have met Patty and she seemed to be a nice, friendly and decent young lady,
as were quite a few other escorts I have met. I had spoken to her previously
about something connected with the ongoing investigation, and what she told
me differs from what is being put forward here, so I asked for some evidence
for the wrongdoing that caused the ban.
If I had met you, and you had been accused of something by E-I, and I was
familiar with your version of events, I would be asking for clarification also.
As for it affecting my life, well nothing that happens on here affects my real life,
but I won't stand by and watch someone being accused of something if they
are innocent, or guilt hasn't been proved, in the real world or this virtual world.
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 17:47
Sam, with all due respect, I'm sure you have done your investigations, etc and came to a conclusion but have this as a thought
Client visits a lady, get the service he wants etc. Was Happy and want to leave a review, he/she might ask lady for the use of her computer/laptop to do review. This registers the Ip being shared by client and lady. So just because of a shared Ip this is wrong? Oh and I know people who don't post but leaving reviews banned because they use the same Ip, maybe they were house mates, using same wifi/internet cafe facility?
All I would like to highlight is there are flaws of the review system which EI could look into, but weilding an axe just for shared Ip is a bit over board. Which make me say this, the main problem is THE ESCORT OF THE MONTH prize!
why on earth would any self respecting escort allow a client the use of her computer to write a review for her.. if a client wished to leave a review he could do it on his puter.. I have never known a client to ask this.. but if one did I would have refused him.. simple as my computer is private..
They won't. I'm wondering why you are so concerned dear.
Lucy, I highly respect you and everyone here. I am not picking at you on anything, it just that this banning thing is for me like a communist law. Even though it is being told we have evidence,etc, but always there is an excuse we cant show you it,etc.
As long as escorts are safe, its the main thing. Clients input regarding banned user is always shot down. Thats my rant now.
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 17:49
An interesting attitude from someone who often looks for explanations for certain actions herself.
I don't have any examples and I couldn't be arsed going looking for any either.
With respect, Heather, I am entitled to ask questions in the same way you are.
I have met Patty and she seemed to be a nice, friendly and decent young lady,
as were quite a few other escorts I have met. I had spoken to her previously
about something connected with the ongoing investigation, and what she told
me differs from what is being put forward here, so I asked for some evidence
for the wrongdoing that caused the ban. If I had met you, and you had been accused of something by E-I, and I was
familiar with your version of events, I would be asking for clarification also.
As for it affecting my life, well nothing that happens on here affects my real life,
but I won't stand by and watch someone being accused of something if they
are innocent, or guilt hasn't been proved, in the real world or this virtual world.
in your own words on a post here there is e-i version and there is patty`s version and somewhere in between there is the truth..so when people say there is two sides there is actually three...x
why on earth would any self respecting escort allow a client the use of her computer to write a review for her.. if a client wished to leave a review he could do it on his puter.. I have never known a client to ask this.. but if one did I would have refused him.. simple as my computer is private..
It's their choice to allow the use of the computer, you would have to ask the people involved why DA.
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 17:58
It's their choice to allow the use of the computer, you would have to ask the people involved why DA.
We would be banned for that. No one can use your computer to post anything, Jamescork was banned for it at one point, he will confirm.
This is getting silly now :)
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 18:01
It's their choice to allow the use of the computer, you would have to ask the people involved why DA.
as I said above self respecting two very important words..no matter how you butter it up an escort has a choice.. yes she can either live by the rules on the forum she wishes to use or live breaking them and sorry no matter where you are in life eventually breaking rules has its punishment.. simple as...
why on earth would any self respecting escort allow a client the use of her computer to write a review for her.. if a client wished to leave a review he could do it on his puter.. I have never known a client to ask this.. but if one did I would have refused him.. simple as my computer is private..It has happened in the past, not to review but to log in and post on this forum from it, a popular lady and a very popular poster unfortunately saw no harm in him using her laptop, she paid the ultimate price because it was her who let him use it..
An interesting attitude from someone who often looks for explanations for certain actions herself.
I don't have any examples and I couldn't be arsed going looking for any either.
With respect, Heather, I am entitled to ask questions in the same way you are.
I have met Patty and she seemed to be a nice, friendly and decent young lady,
as were quite a few other escorts I have met. I had spoken to her previously
about something connected with the ongoing investigation, and what she told
me differs from what is being put forward here, so I asked for some evidence
for the wrongdoing that caused the ban.
If I had met you, and you had been accused of something by E-I, and I was
familiar with your version of events, I would be asking for clarification also.
As for it affecting my life, well nothing that happens on here affects my real life,
but I won't stand by and watch someone being accused of something if they
are innocent, or guilt hasn't been proved, in the real world or this virtual world.
I have been affected by the actions of this person/group of people. In no small way either. I am not the only escort to be affected. There is a lot more to this but That is more than you need to know. Just because you met someone as a client or spoke to them on a message board and liked them does not entitle you to evidence or anything else.
I have been affected by the actions of this person/group of people. In no small way either. I am not the only escort to be affected. That is more than you need to know. Just because you met someone as a client or spoke to them on a message board and liked them does not entitle you to evidence or anything else.You're being very harsh Heather, clients and escorts can get close, morso clients getting very close to escorts and it's only human nature for one to look out for people they care about and try speak up in ther defence and seek explanations, even if they are wrong..
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 18:14
It has happened in the past, not to review but to log in and post on this forum from it, a popular lady and a very popular poster unfortunately saw no harm in him using her laptop, she paid the ultimate price because it was her who let him use it..
I guess another fine example of what happens when escort and punters cross the line of professionalism..
Lucy, I highly respect you and everyone here. I am not picking at you on anything, it just that this banning thing is for me like a communist law. Even though it is being told we have evidence,etc, but always there is an excuse we cant show you it,etc.
As long as escorts are safe, its the main thing. Clients input regarding banned user is always shot down. Thats my rant now.
Why do you think you are entitled to see it? Not showing you, is not an excuse. It's a fact that it's none of yours or anybodies damned business.
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 18:16
You're being very harsh Heather, clients and escorts can get close, morso clients getting very close to escorts and it's only human nature for one to look out for people they care about and try speak up in ther defence and seek explanations, even if they are wrong..
its when the line of professionalism is crossed the problems begin.. yes people can become friends and get close.. but hell there is a line and when this is crossed problems begin and this continues to be proved again and again.. is this that difficult to understand..
Why do you think you are entitled to see it? Not showing you, is not an excuse. It's a fact that it's none of yours or anybodies damned business.
Say whatever you like Heather, but thats the way I see it.
You're being very harsh Heather, clients and escorts can get close, morso clients getting very close to escorts and it's only human nature for one to look out for people they care about and try speak up in ther defence and seek explanations, even if they are wrong..
Being in this job I am constantly having to defend my privacy because people think they have a right to ask personal questions. In my book, the less clients know the better. Now, can you explain to me why he has a right to know anything about this?
Say whatever you like Heather, but thats the way I see it.
I know that's the way you see it. I respect that. I am asking you why you think you are entitled to see proof?
its when the line of professionalism is crossed the problems begin.. yes people can become friends and get close.. but hell there is a line and when this is crossed problems begin and this continues to be proved again and again.. is this that difficult to understand..You get me wrong, I'm not trying to justify the wrong actions of client and escort with no exceptions, I'm merely saying after the fact it's only natural for parties not involved yet close to the lady to seek clarification. I'm not even saying they are entitiled to it. What Sam has already said is fair enough..
Shirley Joy
13-11-11, 18:20
will we say 7.5% lol meet u half way lol
I think it's much more when someone is "fighting" so hard to win EOM :rolleyes:
Being in this job I am constantly having to defend my privacy because people think they have a right to ask personal questions. In my book, the less clients know the better. Now, can you explain to me why he has a right to know anything about this?Like I said Heather, not trying to defend anyone, I was merely saying it's natural for clients to seek clarification, persoanl info is nobodies business but the ladies but that doesn't mean they haven't the right to ask for clarification, it also doesn't mean the are entitled to have it..
I know that's the way you see it. I respect that. I am asking you why you think you are entitled to see proof?
Why always say our explanation is limited,etc. Anyway, everyone I would like to just say something. As a client, I have no input on certain things, even though it makes sense. And for everyone reading all this, you know what you have done and even though you say nothing about it/don't get involved, you know yourselves.
Apologies to everyone who might have taken my posts in a wrong way, but I speak whats in my mind. I don't agree to everything which has been said and I will never win.
Why do you think you are entitled to see it? Not showing you, is not an excuse. It's a fact that it's none of yours or anybodies damned business.
Heather your a fiesty young lady cough when can we meet up I need a bit of sense knocking into me .
Like I said Heather, not trying to defend anyone, I was merely saying it's natural for clients to seek clarification, persoanl info is nobodies business but the ladies but that doesn't mean they haven't the right to ask for clarification, it also doesn't mean the are entitled to have it..
And I am just letting them know that they do not have a right to it...
Why always say our explanation is limited,etc. Anyway, everyone I would like to just say something. As a client, I have no input on certain things, even though it makes sense. And for everyone reading all this, you know what you have done and even though you say nothing about it/don't get involved, you know yourselves.
Apologies to everyone who might have taken my posts in a wrong way, but I speak whats in my mind. I don't agree to everything which has been said and I will never win.
If you have something to say or want to ask something, insinuation and innuendo is useless. Just spit it out. People cannot defend themselves or confirm anything (or tell you to piss off) if they don't know what you are on about.
Heather your a fiesty young lady cough when can we meet up I need a bit of sense knocking into me .
Some people just need things spelling out to them clearly. It's very frustrating. Sometimes you just have to say it. :)
Some people just need things spelling out to them clearly. It's very frustrating. Sometimes you just have to say it. :)
The way it is :D
Sam. May I just ask why explanations are expected and given. I have never seen explanations and details given on other boards and I have been using them for 8 years. Frankly, what management does regarding the boards and its members is nobody's business. If you feel a banning has to be announced fair enough, but an explanation to anyone who demands it? Tell em to fuck off.
We shall be taking a leaf out of your book :)
You haven't got a leg to stand on, and your vicious little innuendo only serves to make you look more suspect. As I would imagine you have met the lady concerned though, perhaps you can explain what her pictures are doing on another profile.
Truth is out there? Yup, and an awful lot of deranged conspiracy theorists too.
Ambiguity seems to be such an exhausted resource these days :rolleyes:
Oh, the power of suggestibility... it just defines how clueless people are when they resort to taking pot-shots in the dark.
We shall be taking a leaf out of your book :)
I find 'Fuck Off' leaves nobody in any doubt.
Well boys and girls all this patty business has given me a fierce thirst so what a better way to end a weekend but a few pints of porter and probably coppers just as well there's no work tomorrow happy days EI have a save and happy night good night and god bless.:D
I find 'Fuck Off' leaves nobody in any doubt.
benny sam i demand answers !!!!
samlad fuck off benny.
yeah it could work....lol
benny sam i demand answers !!!!
samlad fuck off benny.
yeah it could work....lol
Let's not start quoting from the mod forum either!
Im sorry but why are two threads in the same topic?
I find 'Fuck Off' leaves nobody in any doubt.
Ah heather darling not very lady like lol.
i'm not the biggest fan of the mods or managers of this site. but i have to say well done on rooting out this little ring of scammers.
i dont always agree with some of the ban's and sometimes ask for more details as why someone was banned but on this one i feel sam gave enough info as to why the actions that were taken were taken.
all i can say is well done and keep up the good work.
thanks
Ah heather darling not very lady like lol.
I am ladylike with the people who matter :P
Ah heather darling not very lady like lol.
Thought you had a pint with your name on Fitzy. lol
i'm not the biggest fan of the mods or managers of this site. but i have to say well done on rooting out this little ring of scammers.
i dont always agree with some of the ban's and sometimes ask for more details as why someone was banned but on this one i feel sam gave enough info as to why the actions that were taken were taken.
all i can say is well done and keep up the good work.
thanks
Will you teach me to post politely like you do please.
You say what I mean, but without sounding like Hitler.
We shall be taking a leaf out of your book :)
You already have, but were slightly less expressive than Heather.
It seems to be ok for some escorts to be very dismissive of a client's views,
but, when it's the other way round, some people get on their high horse.
I thought the message board was intended to be a means of conversing
about the escort industry, and other subjects of mutual interest, and for
clients and escorts to integrate.
It also kept E-I high up on internet search functions from clients looking for escorts,
which would be of great benefit to E-I and the escorts.
If we cannot ask for clarifications when we feel there is something not quite right,
then there's nothing more for me here.
gentelmandave
13-11-11, 19:16
It's also an ironic one considering he had his own rock to crawl out from when he was a wannabe pimp. I was offered 'accommodation' from him. He didnt say outright that it was in exchange for sex but that's definitely what was implied. I already knew about him from other girls so I didn't bother getting back to him. I have kept this under my hat for a long long time but frankly I am sick of seeing swamp dwellers on these boards acting all outraged at the actions of others.
only on page four here but you rock Heather:paddy-smiley8: great post girl:)
Thought you had a pint with your name on Fitzy. lol
The night is young Harry oh the joys of the smart phone where would we be without it posting at the bar jasus I love technology.
You already have, but were slightly less expressive than Heather.
It seems to be ok for some escorts to be very dismissive of a client's views,
but, when it's the other way round, some people get on their high horse.
I thought the message board was intended to be a means of conversing
about the escort industry, and other subjects of mutual interest, and for
clients and escorts to integrate.
It also kept E-I high up on internet search functions from clients looking for escorts,
which would be of great benefit to E-I and the escorts.
If we cannot ask for clarifications when we feel there is something not quite right,
then there's nothing more for me here.
There are two threads about this and a combination of over 100 posts; it's not as if it hasn't been explained. E-I are not the guilty party here, a group of escorts are. I'm sorry you find that difficult to accept.
The night is young Harry oh the joys of the smart phone where would we be without it posting at the bar jasus I love technology.
Never thought of that Fitzy. Nice one.
You already have, but were slightly less expressive than Heather.
It seems to be ok for some escorts to be very dismissive of a client's views,
but, when it's the other way round, some people get on their high horse.
I thought the message board was intended to be a means of conversing
about the escort industry, and other subjects of mutual interest, and for
clients and escorts to integrate.
It also kept E-I high up on internet search functions from clients looking for escorts,
which would be of great benefit to E-I and the escorts.
If we cannot ask for clarifications when we feel there is something not quite right,
then there's nothing more for me here.
While you are licking your wounds Forrest, allow me to quote your reply to me.
I have met Patty and she seemed to be a nice, friendly and decent young lady,
as were quite a few other escorts I have met. I had spoken to her previously
about something connected with the ongoing investigation, and what she told
me differs from what is being put forward here, so I asked for some evidence
for the wrongdoing that caused the ban.
In my opinion this is nothing more than gossipping and nosiness.
ahh brighten up my butterballs its a lovely day its warm and raining and my arse is all sweaty lol :D
i think this thread might be locked soon lol :(
but not b4 i let a huge massive turbelent fart from the bumhole cheeks :D
come stop fighting all kiss and make up :D my face is on the market lol but dont bother trying to get in my boxers cause i already have an arsehole in there hahaha :D
I am ladylike with the people who matter :P
No doubt heather fiesty and always say what's on your mind a true quality in a woman .
only on page four here but you rock Heather:paddy-smiley8: great post girl:)
I wouldn't win any popularity contests but I am fed up of the bullshit personalities that are peddled around here.
Just waiting for some smartarse to ask me for proof and evidence now... sigh lol
ahh brighten up my butterballs its a lovely day its warm and raining and my arse is all sweaty lol :D
i think this thread might be locked soon lol :(
but not b4 i let a huge massive turbelent fart from the bumhole cheeks :D
come stop fighting all kiss and make up :D my face is on the market lol but dont bother trying to get in my boxers cause i already have an arsehole in there hahaha :D
Good evening Mer. Have you remembered your medication today? Sure an extra one would do no harm. Mwah xx
gentelmandave
13-11-11, 19:33
I wouldn't win any popularity contests but I am fed up of the bullshit personalities that are peddled around here.
Just waiting for some smartarse to ask me for proof and evidence now... sigh lol
You speak your mind and call it as you see it as does Lucy so hats off to the Both of ye,:kiss: and to the Mods (sam) for his good work:paddy-smiley8:
Good evening Mer. Have you remembered your medication today? Sure an extra one would do no harm. Mwah xx
and good evening to you too heather hunni ;) ahh yes i took my medication today, keep it our little secret tho sshhh lol :D ahh yes an extra 1 wud do no more harm me thinks too ;) you can give me as much as you want hun lol ;) :kiss:
There are two threads about this and a combination of over 100 posts; it's not as if it hasn't been explained. E-I are not the guilty party here, a group of escorts are. I'm sorry you find that difficult to accept.
Your version of explained obviously differs from mine, Sam, but c'est la vie.
While you are licking your wounds Forrest, allow me to quote your reply to me.
I have met Patty and she seemed to be a nice, friendly and decent young lady,
as were quite a few other escorts I have met. I had spoken to her previously
about something connected with the ongoing investigation, and what she told
me differs from what is being put forward here, so I asked for some evidence
for the wrongdoing that caused the ban.
In my opinion this is nothing more than gossipping and nosiness.
I am far from licking any wounds, Heather, and there is no need to quote what I have written,
as I remember everything I have commented on today.
As for your comment about the post you have quoted, it would seem then that I am not alone
in the gossiping and nosiness stakes then, considering everyone bar me has, apparently, been
talking behind the scenes about it for ages.
I only asked Patty, when I last met her a month ago, why her advertising profile wasn't linked
to her member profile anymore, as it didn't make sense not to have them linked.
At least I was polite in my comments on here. It's a pity the same cannot be said for you.
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 20:01
Your version of explained obviously differs from mine, Sam, but c'est la vie.
I am far from licking any wounds, Heather, and there is no need to quote what I have written,
as I remember everything I have commented on today.
As for your comment about the post you have quoted, it would seem then that I am not alone
in the gossiping and nosiness stakes then, considering everyone bar me has, apparently, been
talking behind the scenes about it for ages.I only asked Patty, when I last met her a month ago, why her advertising profile wasn't linked
to her member profile anymore, as it didn't make sense not to have them linked.
At least I was polite in my comments on here. It's a pity the same cannot be said for you.
sorry i aint been talkingabout it behind the scenes either.. so i guess there is more than you and i who have not been talking behind the scenes
Your version of explained obviously differs from mine, Sam, but c'est la vie.
I am far from licking any wounds, Heather, and there is no need to quote what I have written,
as I remember everything I have commented on today.
As for your comment about the post you have quoted, it would seem then that I am not alone
in the gossiping and nosiness stakes then, considering everyone bar me has, apparently, been
talking behind the scenes about it for ages.
I only asked Patty, when I last met her a month ago, why her advertising profile wasn't linked
to her member profile anymore, as it didn't make sense not to have them linked.
At least I was polite in my comments on here. It's a pity the same cannot be said for you.
I wouldn't know whats been talked about and what hasn't. I haven't seen any gossiping. Then again, I don't tend to look for any that doesn't concern me. The first time her name was mentioned to us, so far as I am aware, is today. I am happy with the explanation.
Your version of explained obviously differs from mine, Sam, but c'est la vie.
I am far from licking any wounds, Heather, and there is no need to quote what I have written,
as I remember everything I have commented on today.
As for your comment about the post you have quoted, it would seem then that I am not alone
in the gossiping and nosiness stakes then, considering everyone bar me has, apparently, been
talking behind the scenes about it for ages.
I only asked Patty, when I last met her a month ago, why her advertising profile wasn't linked
to her member profile anymore, as it didn't make sense not to have them linked.
At least I was polite in my comments on here. It's a pity the same cannot be said for you.
sorry to burst your bubble forest but today is the first i have herd or seen of this so it seems you have knowen about this for longer than some of us.
sorry to burst your bubble forest but today is the first i have herd or seen of this so it seems you have knowen about this for longer than some of us.
You're not bursting my bubble. I knew there was a problem, but I didn't know the details and I said 'apparently',
based on the comment Sam made earlier today about how common knowledge it was.
To be honest, when this announcement was made, you'd be surprised just have common knowledge this was, given the influx of PM's and phone calls I suddenly received.*
I have also received pm's today that confirm that it was a topic of conversation among some escorts & members
for a while now.
You're not bursting my bubble. I knew there was a problem, but I didn't know the details and I said 'apparently',
based on the comment Sam made earlier today about how common knowledge it was.
I have also received pm's today that confirm that it was a topic of conversation among some escorts & members
for a while now.
You have already been told that there is a lot more to this. You would not like the details. They are not pretty.
You have already been told that there is a lot more to this. You would not like the details. They are not pretty.
I don't care if the details are not pretty and, from the rumours of information I received via pm, I now know a lot more
about E-I's reasons for the ban. If I hadn't persisted with my questions I might not have received the pm's, and would
still be oblivious to the full extent of the allegations.
It's just another typical E-I Sunday shit storm. Why do most of these things happen on a Sunday.:confused:
Anyway, I have had enough of the discussion on this. I will speak to Patty about it if I get the opportunity
to meet her again, which I hope to do, as she is still a very good escort, imo.
DONEGALANGEL
13-11-11, 21:16
I don't care if the details are not pretty and, from the rumours of information I received via pm, I now know a lot more
about E-I's reasons for the ban. If I hadn't persisted with my questions I might not have received the pm's, and would
still be oblivious to the full extent of the allegations.
It's just another typical E-I Sunday shit storm. Why do most of these things happen on a Sunday.:confused:
Anyway, I have had enough of the discussion on this. I will speak to Patty about it if I get the opportunity
to meet her again, which I hope to do, as she is still a very good escort, imo.
to be honest noone queried patty being a good escort.. not here anyway or anywhere else that I have read.. and I am sure you will meet here again after all as far as I know she is still advertising..so no real reason for that dramatic statement forrest as if you will never have the opportunity.. I know you said you pm her for meetings but now you will just have to phone her.. at the end of the day if her business and pm`s were so important to her she would not have broken the rules and to be honest that goes for all escorts if the pm system and boards are so important to them they will play by the rules dont you think..
MrNiceGuy2010
13-11-11, 21:20
Sweet Carol: https://www.escort-ireland.com/18103/SweetCarol/irish-escort.html
The reviews are suspended as they are duplicate.
Quite surprisingly, her pictures have suddenly 'vanished' since this investigation, however I did take the liberty of taking a screen shot:
http://i.imgur.com/MxSRO.jpg
For obvious reasons, I won't include the verification picture.
Fucking hell nice pics,the last ones a cracker :)
You have already been told that there is a lot more to this. You would not like the details. They are not pretty.
Please come out with the details, not only for this but for others as well. But you know it won't come out, so why even suggest it.
Please come out with the details, not only for this but for others as well. But you know it won't come out, so why even suggest it.
You have one review, for the lady in question. All the messages on your profile are between you and the lady in question, nobody else. You are here being all defensive about the lady in question. Go tell it to an idiot. I'm coming out with nothing. Do one.
Lucy Chambers
13-11-11, 22:16
I cannot believe this thread is still running. For the ladies to come onto this thread, there is a problem. Digest that, then please respect what has been said and ask no more. Chivalry is grand, as long as you show it for everyone.
carlos marvado
13-11-11, 22:29
Brother Carlos, tis me, crawling out of the rock...I don't agree with this banning until there is a post from Patty or any other banned member for that matter.(but that won't happen because their accounts are already banned)
I agree investigations were done, for all the matters not only now, but there is no explanation from the 'guilty' party. Yes, EI staff are doing their job but is not a democratic society we live in, in this day and age.
Everything we read comes from the decision taken by EI, if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in very good way(I think).
There is always a doubting Thomas........we would'nt have doubting Thomases in a perfect world ........but such is the human condition.
I posted a reply to Brother Forrest on the thread in General Chat. From my perspective, I can see nothing in it for E-I to invent all these allegations......if anything, E-I are putting their hands up and admitting that the escort private forum has been compromise and that the review system has been manipulated. Ok, maybe many here were long aware of these two facts, but many newbies possibly were'nt. So E-I admit the imperfections of the system, thereby causing many to feel less confident in it..........in football parlance, it's an E-I own goal.
Therefore, I accept what Sam posted, I believe irrefutable evidence must be available.......otherwise why bother, and I accept that for reasons of data security/privacy, this evidence will not be posted on an open forum. You are probably spot on when you state "if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in a very good way (I think)." But that begs the question, when an actual case of fixing of reviews (just to leave the whole issue of compromising the escort private forum aside for one moment) is proven to have taken place, should E-I take some form of action, or should they just ignore it on the basis that this sort of thing is going on all the time? Furthermore, if E-I were to ignore it, would you as someone who frequents escorts, feel more or less confident in the integrity of the review system?
On the basis of natural justice and fair play, you would like Patty to have the opportunity to answer all these charges against her and others. Well, I think I could make fair effort at scripting the response:
"It was'nt me Gov'nor.......honest to God, I was set up by a one armed man that I met down at the laundrette. While I took off my lingerie to wash it at 30C, he made free with my E-I password and impersonated me......he was a brilliant impersonator."
On the basis of the form guide, I would'nt be holding my breath for an admission........but I have been known to be wrong in the past.
Now, back under your rock.........I hear it's a very luxurious and upmarket rock. :D:D:D
carlos marvado
13-11-11, 22:42
That quite frankly is an outrageous statement
It is, is'nt it? But strangely enough, as yet nobody has tried to actually defend the use of these sharp practices.
If anybody is in favour of leaking information from the escort private forum, or of posting fake reviews to manipulate EOM, could they kindly pm Samlad so he can deal with them.
As I stated in my original post, a person who would defend or engage in such practices is obviously a creature of the night who crawls out from under his/her rocky lair to prey on the unsuspecting.
to be honest noone queried patty being a good escort.. not here anyway or anywhere else that I have read.. and I am sure you will meet here again after all as far as I know she is still advertising..so no real reason for that dramatic statement forrest as if you will never have the opportunity.. I know you said you pm her for meetings but now you will just have to phone her.. at the end of the day if her business and pm`s were so important to her she would not have broken the rules and to be honest that goes for all escorts if the pm system and boards are so important to them they will play by the rules dont you think..
That wasn't a dramatic statement, DA, so please don't be reading more into my comments than there actually is.
I don't meet escorts on a regular basis, so it would be a case of me noticing Patty was in Dublin at a time when
I might be free to visit her. That is the case for a couple of other escorts that I have never met, would like to meet,
but circumstances may never permit it to happen.
I think these reviews and forums are BULLSHIT i had a top reviewer ( you know who you are ) txting me saying he will give me a review even though he hasnt seen me he said id get lots of work if he gave me a review people listen to him apparantly :s come on mate im 22 and english im sure your one good review will not affect my buisness dramaticly. Anyway i politely asked for him not to because i like my reviews to reflect me as a escort and he didnt leave me one. Then someone told me a client had told her about a post id made in the escort private forum which i was ABSOLUTLY LIVID about as i dont know hardly anyone in the escorting buisness so i used that to let off a bit of steam and ask more experianced escorts questions because iv not been in the buisness long, I feel i cant do that no more as i know clients have access to them. I don't come on here much but i think some of use need to get with the real world instead of coming on here arguing about someone whos put us escorts in a vunerable situation, Just think its getting ridiculous and clients and escorts are getting to involved in each others lives lets have fun and excitment guys i thought thats what this buisness was about ;)
You have one review, for the lady in question. All the messages on your profile are between you and the lady in question, nobody else. You are here being all defensive about the lady in question. Go tell it to an idiot. I'm coming out with nothing. Do one.
It my choice who I visit and leave a review So what if all the messages in my profile are from the lady in question and nobody else. Does that mean I'm doing something wrong?
You're being more rude by saying all that. And I didn't ask you to come out with anything.
There is always a doubting Thomas........we would'nt have doubting Thomases in a perfect world ........but such is the human condition.
I posted a reply to Brother Forrest on the thread in General Chat. From my perspective, I can see nothing in it for E-I to invent all these allegations......if anything, E-I are putting their hands up and admitting that the escort private forum has been compromise and that the review system has been manipulated. Ok, maybe many here were long aware of these two facts, but many newbies possibly were'nt. So E-I admit the imperfections of the system, thereby causing many to feel less confident in it..........in football parlance, it's an E-I own goal.
Therefore, I accept what Sam posted, I believe irrefutable evidence must be available.......otherwise why bother, and I accept that for reasons of data security/privacy, this evidence will not be posted on an open forum. You are probably spot on when you state "if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in a very good way (I think)." But that begs the question, when an actual case of fixing of reviews (just to leave the whole issue of compromising the escort private forum aside for one moment) is proven to have taken place, should E-I take some form of action, or should they just ignore it on the basis that this sort of thing is going on all the time? Furthermore, if E-I were to ignore it, would you as someone who frequents escorts, feel more or less confident in the integrity of the review system?
On the basis of natural justice and fair play, you would like Patty to have the opportunity to answer all these charges against her and others. Well, I think I could make fair effort at scripting the response:
"It was'nt me Gov'nor.......honest to God, I was set up by a one armed man that I met down at the laundrette. While I took off my lingerie to wash it at 30C, he made free with my E-I password and impersonated me......he was a brilliant impersonator."
On the basis of the form guide, I would'nt be holding my breath for an admission........but I have been known to be wrong in the past.
Now, back under your rock.........I hear it's a very luxurious and upmarket rock. :D:D:D
I've said my peace about this matter Brother Carlos, so I'll go back under my rock and yes it's very luxurious and upmarket.
Ok I have read this whole thread and I wish to put my oar in as I am interfering bollix. I do not know of the details of the allegations or the "more" that aint pretty and I accept the decision of EI to ban Patty and whatever else, however I do not believe it is in anyones interest not to explain why. I have been here a few months now and the Mods and EI get crucified on the forums for being hitler like and secretive, that is one reason to explain the ban, secondly if an escort is banned for sharing confidential escort forum material, the clients have a right to know in case their identity etc is also in the possession of the same escort.
Clients are entitled to ask questions about these things and they are entitled to answers that may affect them so the "fuck off" explanation is not a runner in my book. For the record I pmed sam today after I read about the ban asking if the an accusation against a client was based on one instance of a shared IP address as it could have been someone using the girls laptop to post, so it is not far fetched. I have never done it and never would but it is not beyond the realms of possibility.
As for the moral indignation of some of the posters on both sides, all I will say is get off your high horses, read your posts over the past few months and tell me that you don't gossip, insinuate etc etc, we all do.
I would love to see "peace love and understanding" but most of all lets kill the hypocrisy, myself included. I await your examples please so I can take my virtual whipping and eat copious amounts of humble pie, but I will try to be a better person.
xxx
Ok I have read this whole thread and I wish to put my oar in as I am interfering bollix. I do not know of the details of the allegations or the "more" that aint pretty and I accept the decision of EI to ban Patty and whatever else, however I do not believe it is in anyones interest not to explain why. I have been here a few months now and the Mods and EI get crucified on the forums for being hitler like and secretive, that is one reason to explain the ban, secondly if an escort is banned for sharing confidential escort forum material, the clients have a right to know in case their identity etc is also in the possession of the same escort.
Clients are entitled to ask questions about these things and they are entitled to answers that may affect them so the "fuck off" explanation is not a runner in my book. For the record I pmed sam today after I read about the ban asking if the an accusation against a client was based on one instance of a shared IP address as it could have been someone using the girls laptop to post, so it is not far fetched. I have never done it and never would but it is not beyond the realms of possibility.
As for the moral indignation of some of the posters on both sides, all I will say is get off your high horses, read your posts over the past few months and tell me that you don't gossip, insinuate etc etc, we all do.
I would love to see "peace love and understanding" but most of all lets kill the hypocrisy, myself included. I await your examples please so I can take my virtual whipping and eat copious amounts of humble pie, but I will try to be a better person.
xxx
I disagree. If an escort has been banned for a reason that has affected other escorts then their safety and privacy must come first. No escort should be put at risk for any reason. I am sure if it was something where a warning was needed for clients to be aware, then a statement would be put out for the clients.
Ok I have read this whole thread and I wish to put my oar in as I am interfering bollix. I do not know of the details of the allegations or the "more" that aint pretty and I accept the decision of EI to ban Patty and whatever else, however I do not believe it is in anyones interest not to explain why. I have been here a few months now and the Mods and EI get crucified on the forums for being hitler like and secretive, that is one reason to explain the ban, secondly if an escort is banned for sharing confidential escort forum material, the clients have a right to know in case their identity etc is also in the possession of the same escort.
Clients are entitled to ask questions about these things and they are entitled to answers that may affect them so the "fuck off" explanation is not a runner in my book. For the record I pmed sam today after I read about the ban asking if the an accusation against a client was based on one instance of a shared IP address as it could have been someone using the girls laptop to post, so it is not far fetched. I have never done it and never would but it is not beyond the realms of possibility.
As for the moral indignation of some of the posters on both sides, all I will say is get off your high horses, read your posts over the past few months and tell me that you don't gossip, insinuate etc etc, we all do.
I would love to see "peace love and understanding" but most of all lets kill the hypocrisy, myself included. I await your examples please so I can take my virtual whipping and eat copious amounts of humble pie, but I will try to be a better person.
xxx
Doodles, you really read the whole thread,lol? Mate, there will be no explanation of what so ever from EI, because Sam has already mentioned he won't be able to do that, and there will be no explanation from banned members because they can't post anymore.
I guess this is another day of scandal on EI, it will settle down from tommorow and when it will happen again is another days story.:D I know there are daggers waiting at the back of me and we shall see what happens next.:)
Lucy, are you finished with that blade :rolleyes: Fuckin hell :rolleyes:
Doodles, you really read the whole thread,lol? Mate, there will be no explanation of what so ever from EI, because Sam has already mentioned he won't be able to do that, and there will be no explanation from banned members because they can't post anymore.
I guess this is another day of scandal on EI, it will settle down from tommorow and when it will happen again is another days story.:D I know there are daggers waiting at the back of me and we shall see what happens next.:)
Why would there be daggers waiting at the back of you? Who are you? ;)
Why would there be daggers waiting at the back of you? Who are you? ;)
Why are you so concerned about daggers waiting at the back of me, are you going to help me?;)
I'm the person under the rock!:D
Why would there be daggers waiting at the back of you? Who are you? ;)
Why so concerned about daggers waiting at the back of me, are you going to help me?;)
I'm the person under the rock!:D
I disagree. If an escort has been banned for a reason that has affected other escorts then their safety and privacy must come first. No escort should be put at risk for any reason. I am sure if it was something where a warning was needed for clients to be aware, then a statement would be put out for the clients.
Heather I am not for one minute suggesting that any explanation should endanger escorts in any way... you misunderstand, my point was simply that some explanation is necessary so the "fuck off" defense is not valid, nor should not be contemplated. Thats all....I am still trying to be a better person.
I've said for a long time that E-I should announce when people are banned, and give the reasons. In this case they have, and I don't have any grounds to doubt those reasons.
Heather I am not for one minute suggesting that any explanation should endanger escorts in any way... you misunderstand, my point was simply that some explanation is necessary so the "fuck off" defense is not valid, nor should not be contemplated. Thats all....I am still trying to be a better person.
I was pointing out that more detailed explanations of the type which some members are demanding could do just that.
I feel that if an announcement is made and a simple explanation given then that should be enough.
If it's not enough for some people then the fuck off rule should come into play :)
My apologies if there was a misunderstanding.
I was pointing out that more detailed explanations of the type which some members are demanding could do just that.
I feel that if an announcement is made and a simple explanation given then that should be enough.
If it's not enough for some people then the fuck off rule should come into play :)
My apologies if there was a misunderstanding.
No need to apologize, I said at the start I am an interfering bollix..so my fault actually, lol
No need to apologize, I said at the start I am an interfering bollix..so my fault actually, lol
It's fine to be an interfering bollix. It's the interfering bollixes who refuse to acknowledge their interfering bollixiness that gets my watters heated :)
Lucy Chambers
14-11-11, 01:27
Ok I have read this whole thread and I wish to put my oar in as I am interfering bollix. I do not know of the details of the allegations or the "more" that aint pretty and I accept the decision of EI to ban Patty and whatever else, however I do not believe it is in anyones interest not to explain why. I have been here a few months now and the Mods and EI get crucified on the forums for being hitler like and secretive, that is one reason to explain the ban, secondly if an escort is banned for sharing confidential escort forum material, the clients have a right to know in case their identity etc is also in the possession of the same escort.
Clients are entitled to ask questions about these things and they are entitled to answers that may affect them so the "fuck off" explanation is not a runner in my book. For the record I pmed sam today after I read about the ban asking if the an accusation against a client was based on one instance of a shared IP address as it could have been someone using the girls laptop to post, so it is not far fetched. I have never done it and never would but it is not beyond the realms of possibility.
As for the moral indignation of some of the posters on both sides, all I will say is get off your high horses, read your posts over the past few months and tell me that you don't gossip, insinuate etc etc, we all do.
I would love to see "peace love and understanding" but most of all lets kill the hypocrisy, myself included. I await your examples please so I can take my virtual whipping and eat copious amounts of humble pie, but I will try to be a better person.
xxx
Ya, I insinuate. I insinuated the other day and you told me I had to provide examples of my thoughts. I told you I would leave that to the powers that be. I wonder, was I gossiping then?
How dare you tar us with the same brush? How dare you make all equal? We aren't equal. Some play by the rules. Glad to see we have such support for that. Now excuse me, I have to go tend to my six other profiles.
Ya, I insinuate. I insinuated the other day and you told me I had to provide examples of my thoughts. I told you I would leave that to the powers that be. I wonder, was I gossiping then?
How dare you tar us with the same brush? How dare you make all equal? We aren't equal. Some play by the rules. Glad to see we have such support for that. Now excuse me, I have to go tend to my six other profiles.
Lucy my comments were more self reflective than anything else, we all insinuate and maybe we all need to look at how we interact on these forums. Not wishing to offend you in any way, I think my point to you the other day was merely if you had hard evidence or was it speculation. I didn't ask you to publish merely if you had evidence. I am not tarring you or me with the same brush and if you read that out of my post then you fail to see the nuances, and I apologize for that.
It's fine to be an interfering bollix. It's the interfering bollixes who refuse to acknowledge their interfering bollixiness that gets my watters heated :)
Get you heater checked then!
Get you heater checked then!
Meow! So catty.. for a 'man' lol ;)
Come on. Fess up girl :)
I think these reviews and forums are BULLSHIT i had a top reviewer ( you know who you are ) txting me saying he will give me a review even though he hasnt seen me he said id get lots of work if he gave me a review people listen to him apparantly :s come on mate im 22 and english im sure your one good review will not affect my buisness dramaticly. Anyway i politely asked for him not to because i like my reviews to reflect me as a escort and he didnt leave me one. Then someone told me a client had told her about a post id made in the escort private forum which i was ABSOLUTLY LIVID about as i dont know hardly anyone in the escorting buisness so i used that to let off a bit of steam and ask more experianced escorts questions because iv not been in the buisness long, I feel i cant do that no more as i know clients have access to them. I don't come on here much but i think some of use need to get with the real world instead of coming on here arguing about someone whos put us escorts in a vunerable situation, Just think its getting ridiculous and clients and escorts are getting to involved in each others lives lets have fun and excitment guys i thought thats what this buisness was about ;)
Faith - I've heard the same thing from a couple of escorts. Unfortunately that sort of carry on will never go away. There will always be escorts and clients that will take advantage for their own benefit or perceived benefit. Thank God the majority of escorts are genuine and don't put up with that sort of shit.
monster_monster
14-11-11, 11:01
I think these reviews and forums are BULLSHIT i had a top reviewer ( you know who you are ) txting me saying he will give me a review even though he hasnt seen me he said id get lots of work if he gave me a review people listen to him apparantly :s come on mate im 22 and english im sure your one good review will not affect my buisness dramaticly. Anyway i politely asked for him not to because i like my reviews to reflect me as a escort and he didnt leave me one. Then someone told me a client had told her about a post id made in the escort private forum which i was ABSOLUTLY LIVID about as i dont know hardly anyone in the escorting buisness so i used that to let off a bit of steam and ask more experianced escorts questions because iv not been in the buisness long, I feel i cant do that no more as i know clients have access to them. I don't come on here much but i think some of use need to get with the real world instead of coming on here arguing about someone whos put us escorts in a vunerable situation, Just think its getting ridiculous and clients and escorts are getting to involved in each others lives lets have fun and excitment guys i thought thats what this buisness was about ;)
out the fucker
wanted the best 69
14-11-11, 12:41
ok still not learning.......................... REPORT THIS TO SAM NOW....................let him deal with it,not spread more shit over these boards come on hun take it to sam now
ok still not learning.......................... REPORT THIS TO SAM NOW....................let him deal with it,not spread more shit over these boards come on hun take it to sam nowThere is no real point IMO, without real proof they won't do anything and in all fairness how can they, half of us would be banned if they were to believe everything that is said to them. I know from first hand, I reported 2 from the top list that I was informed had submitted false reviews, nothing was done because I had no digital evidence...
Ok I have read this whole thread and I wish to put my oar in as I am interfering bollix. I do not know of the details of the allegations or the "more" that aint pretty and I accept the decision of EI to ban Patty and whatever else, however I do not believe it is in anyones interest not to explain why. I have been here a few months now and the Mods and EI get crucified on the forums for being hitler like and secretive, that is one reason to explain the ban, secondly if an escort is banned for sharing confidential escort forum material, the clients have a right to know in case their identity etc is also in the possession of the same escort.
Clients are entitled to ask questions about these things and they are entitled to answers that may affect them so the "fuck off" explanation is not a runner in my book. For the record I pmed sam today after I read about the ban asking if the an accusation against a client was based on one instance of a shared IP address as it could have been someone using the girls laptop to post, so it is not far fetched. I have never done it and never would but it is not beyond the realms of possibility.
xxx
We are prepared to be crucified, we know we are going to get stick from some people. We do not reveal every bit of information to the public, this is not something we have ever promised or will promised.Sam has already given the reasoning behind the banning, what more is it you need to know? Dates?Numbers? NAMES?!
Sam and Nicole have done their homework on the matter and taken the right decision. Surely everyone should be happy that there is a few fake reviewers weeded out.
We in no way, condone or give any explanation containing the words 'fuck off'. We dont even have that sort of mentality. Im sure your identity and the identity of others is fine, even if you had met patty in the past, what exactly is it you think is going to happen?
Confidential escort forum information, is as it says on the tin, confidential. Anyone proven to be leaking this information will suffer a ban, we will not negotiate this whatsoever, nor leave them unbanned to make a statement about it. As said before, Sam & Nicole have done their investigation, I trust their word. End of
wanted the best 69
14-11-11, 13:00
There is no real point IMO, without real proof they won't do anything and in all fairness how can they, half of us would be banned if they were to believe everything that is said to them. I know from first hand, I reported 2 from the top list that I was informed had submitted false reviews, nothing was done because I had no digital evidence...
if she still has the pm`s then that is proof
if she still has the pm`s then that is proofThen all she has to do is report the Pm, hit the triangle same way you would report a post..
We are prepared to be crucified, we know we are going to get stick from some people. We do not reveal every bit of information to the public, this is not something we have ever promised or will promised.Sam has already given the reasoning behind the banning, what more is it you need to know? Dates?Numbers? NAMES?!
Sam and Nicole have done their homework on the matter and taken the right decision. Surely everyone should be happy that there is a few fake reviewers weeded out.
We in no way, condone or give any explanation containing the words 'fuck off'. We dont even have that sort of mentality. Im sure your identity and the identity of others is fine, even if you had met patty in the past, what exactly is it you think is going to happen?
Confidential escort forum information, is as it says on the tin, confidential. Anyone proven to be leaking this information will suffer a ban, we will not negotiate this whatsoever, nor leave them unbanned to make a statement about it. As said before, Sam & Nicole have done their investigation, I trust their word. End of
Tom, I was not in any way questioning the results of the investigation or impugning the mods in this issue, it was merely my observations that clients are entitled to ask questions and the "Fuck off" response is not valid. Neither Sam nor Nicole adopted the "fuck off" response, as I stated Sam answered a pm from on the issue and answered it satisfactorily.
Tom, I was not in any way questioning the results of the investigation or impugning the mods in this issue, it was merely my observations that clients are entitled to ask questions and the "Fuck off" response is not valid. Neither Sam nor Nicole adopted the "fuck off" response, as I stated Sam answered a pm from on the issue and answered it satisfactorily.
I do apologise if that come across a bit strong, i was simply using your quote as a template to answer certain questions on the matter mate.
Bar the fuck off bit, that was my bad, I must have read it wrong mate sorry
He never sent me a pm it was through txt and he knows who he is i can hold my head up high and know that i never went along with it, anyway im out of this discussion now iv had my say hehe all take care xx
saoirsemac
14-11-11, 17:18
15pages later and she is still banned!
is it not time to except it and move bloody well on jesus
fuking drama queens
sam cannot start printing senstive info like ip wtf do u expect
patty and girls made a major fuck up
patty the biggest one
ffs lads this is not about ur little online community here this effets the 'real people here'
ie the escorts the ones with pictures numbers and location for all to see
get a grip lads ffs
the person ur fighting with cud be ur borther ur neighbour father uncle or even sister ffs
yer like women sometimes
if this game was left to the girls and all punters/men just butted out
we be better off u know that
men trying to control women is what it is
ye feel ye need to seperate our little fights
stand up for us blah blha
and when we the escorts stand up for each other its like typical girls
leave the buisness and these kinda issue to the girls ffs
u can still go see patty her profile is still here and thats all ye really need
eh
[Any person resorting to using "Fuck Off" is just ignorant and poorly educated, doesn't say much for them.QUOTE=UKHeather;627810]I find 'Fuck Off' leaves nobody in any doubt.[/QUOTE]
[Any person resorting to using "Fuck Off" is just ignorant and poorly educated, doesn't say much for them.QUOTE=UKHeather;627810]I find 'Fuck Off' leaves nobody in any doubt.[/QUOTE]
Yes. You got me. That's me. Ignorant and poorly educated. One's use of profanities is indeed a measure of one's education. I shall recommend that the leading universities of the UK adopt this more cost effective method as recommended by JerryC of Ireland. :rolleyes:
Twit
Yes. You got me. That's me. Ignorant and poorly educated. One's use of profanities is indeed a measure of one's education. I shall recommend that the leading universities of the UK adopt this more cost effective method as recommended by JerryC of Ireland. :rolleyes:
Twit[/QUOTE]
Don't worry, Heather. Sometimes people forget that the use of profanities can be the idiosyncratic dialect of an educated person ;) Especially when one is from a region where profanities are a natural element of the colloquialism.
Yes. You got me. That's me. Ignorant and poorly educated. One's use of profanities is indeed a measure of one's education. I shall recommend that the leading universities of the UK adopt this more cost effective method as recommended by JerryC of Ireland. :rolleyes:
Twit
Don't worry, Heather. Sometimes people forget that the use of profanities can be the idiosyncratic dialect of an educated person ;) Especially when one is from a region where profanities are a natural element of the colloquialism.[/QUOTE]
I know! Fucking northerners! :)
Yes. You got me. That's me. Ignorant and poorly educated. One's use of profanities is indeed a measure of one's education. I shall recommend that the leading universities of the UK adopt this more cost effective method as recommended by JerryC of Ireland. :rolleyes:
Twit
Don't worry, Heather. Sometimes people forget that the use of profanities can be the idiosyncratic dialect of an educated person ;) Especially when one is from a region where profanities are a natural element of the colloquialism.[/QUOTE]
In other words, it's okay for some but not for others. :confused:
Don't worry, Heather. Sometimes people forget that the use of profanities can be the idiosyncratic dialect of an educated person ;) Especially when one is from a region where profanities are a natural element of the colloquialism.
In other words, it's okay for some but not for others. :confused:[/QUOTE]
It's fine for all.. they just need to use the relevant forums.
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 00:18
Interesting thread.
Interesting thread.
A "new member" bumping a thread from 2011??
Right :rolleyes:
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 08:24
A "new member" bumping a thread from 2011??
Right :rolleyes:
Showing your high intelligence once more Mr IP :)
You really shine on these boards.
Showing your high intelligence once more Mr IP :)
You really shine on these boards.
Imagine being so stalkerish as to remember a thread from 7 years ago :eek:
You're a prime example why escorts have to worry
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 10:55
Imagine being so stalkerish as to remember a thread from 7 years ago :eek:
You're a prime example why escorts have to worry
I didn't remember it from 7 years ago mr know it all IP :) . I simply done a bit of research on a recent profile and it landed me here. You seem very self righteous for someone who was banned for stalking other users :) You are a prime example of a love sick sap. Tell me do you condone the type of behaviour which this thread is getting at or are you just another scaremonger for now?
I didn't remember it from 7 years ago mr know it all IP :) . I simply done a bit of research on a recent profile and it landed me here. You seem very self righteous for someone who was banned for stalking other users :) You are a prime example of a love sick sap. Tell me do you condone the type of behaviour which this thread is getting at or are you just another scaremonger for now?
You done research!
on an escort forum!
jesus christ!!!:lmao::lmao:
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 11:03
You done research!
on an escort forum!
jesus christ!!!:lmao::lmao:
Yes research. Punting is now illegal Mr IP. Showing your high intelligence level once again there :)
Yes research. Punting is now illegal Mr IP. Showing your high intelligence level once again there :)
So is stalking,ya weirdo
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 11:43
So is stalking,ya weirdo
Prove it dumb dumb :)
Prove it dumb dumb :)
You've already done that yourself,Mr "i research escort forums in my spare time"
And only psychopaths use unwarranted smileys that much
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 11:57
You've already done that yourself,Mr "i research escort forums in my spare time"
And only psychopaths use unwarranted smileys that much
So you can't prove jack shit :) . Just the word of a star wars nerd is it Mr IP?
You might want to check your own posts on this thread for emoji's before getting at other people.
So you can't prove jack shit :) . Just the word of a star wars nerd is it Mr IP?
You might want to check your own posts on this thread for emoji's before getting at other people.
My lmao and eyeroll emojis weren't unwarranted
you really deserve them
just like you deserve your red bars and negative rep points you were
crying about yesterday :lmao:
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 12:47
My lmao and eyeroll emojis weren't unwarranted
you really deserve them
just like you deserve your red bars and negative rep points you were
crying about yesterday :lmao:
Oh put a sock in it you sad moronic bore. The only thing unwarranted is your internet connection :). You have already proved to be a hypocrite and a dumb dumb to boot, . Following me about the forum posting on my threads like some love sick puppy., The escorts should charge you double.
Oh put a sock in it you sad moronic bore. The only thing unwarranted is your internet connection :). You have already proved to be a hypocrite and a dumb dumb to boot, . Following me about the forum posting on my threads like some love sick puppy., The escorts should charge you double.
Ah dont be loosing your cool,notsoslickmick ;)
tis only banter
dont throw it if you cant take it :D
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 12:55
So you can't prove jack shit :) . Just the word of a star wars nerd is it Mr IP?
You might want to check your own posts on this thread for emoji's before getting at other people.
Ba ha ha. Another negative rep point.
Awww did i hurt your feelings with a few home truths :)
Latest Reputation Received (-505 point(s) total)
03-01-18 12:53
Thread: Patty
constant abuse of other reviewers
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 12:57
Ah dont be loosing your cool,notsoslickmick ;)
tis only banter
dont throw it if you cant take it :D
Says the guy marking posts as red lmao. You have proven that you are dumb, butt hurt and childish. Did i miss anything? Right back to watching Justice League. Have fun at clown college and god help whoever you book next. :)
Ba ha ha. Another negative rep point.
Awww did i hurt your feelings with a few home truths :)
Latest Reputation Received (-505 point(s) total)
03-01-18 12:53
Thread: Patty
constant abuse of other reviewers
Says the guy marking posts as red lmao. You have proven that you are dumb, butt hurt and childish. Did i miss anything? Right back to watching Justice League. Have fun at clown college and god help whoever you book next. :)
i didnt mark that post
why would i bother when i can get you all upset here in the open :D
how many people is that now that you have accused of neg repping you
you're all in a tizzy,poor fella
also,justice league wasnt as bad as people said it was :shrug:
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 13:39
i didnt mark that post
why would i bother when i can get you all upset here in the open :D
how many people is that now that you have accused of neg repping you
you're all in a tizzy,poor fella
also,justice league wasnt as bad as people said it was :shrug:
You are incapable of upsetting me dumb dumb. But keep it up my feeble minded lap dog. You are showing yourself up to be a right fruit cake.
:)
Oh put a sock in it you sad moronic bore. The only thing unwarranted is your internet connection :). You have already proved to be a hypocrite and a dumb dumb to boot, . Following me about the forum posting on my threads like some love sick puppy., The escorts should charge you double.
You are incapable of upsetting me dumb dumb. But keep it up my feeble minded lap dog. You are showing yourself up to be a right fruit cake.
:)
You sounded a bit upset in the the top post there :o
you should really try to keep a sense of humour and not take the forum so seriously
like researching other peoples profiles for hours on end
i dont think its good for you and could be a precursor to actual physical stalking :eek:
try to mellow out man :cool:
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 13:49
You sounded a bit upset in the the top post there :o
you should really try to keep a sense of humour and not take the forum so seriously
like researching other peoples profiles for hours on end
i dont think its good for you and could be a precursor to actual physical stalking :eek:
try to mellow out man :cool:
Hours on end. You have some imagination on you dumb dumb.
Hours on end. You have some imagination on you dumb dumb.
A grown man shouldn't be using the phrase "dumb dumb"
https://media.giphy.com/media/ADr35Z4TvATIc/giphy.gif
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 16:23
A grown man shouldn't be using the phrase "dumb dumb"
https://media.giphy.com/media/ADr35Z4TvATIc/giphy.gif
Says who lmao. A star wars geek who is on here 24/7.
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 16:24
A grown man shouldn't be using the phrase "dumb dumb"
https://media.giphy.com/media/ADr35Z4TvATIc/giphy.gif
Oh and Justice League was piss, I can see why you liked it Dumb Dumb :)
I find it interesting that so many posters from that time are now banned.
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 17:00
I find it interesting that so many posters from that time are now banned.
Funny you should mention that as the names of some of the banned posters have been reinvented and appear on numerous recent reviews of late. I won't post it here on a open forum but if you wish i can pm the information ;)
Says who lmao. A star wars geek who is on here 24/7.
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/500x/62543513/holy-smokes-batman-that-comeback-was-weak.jpg
Funny you should mention that as the names of some of the banned posters have been reinvented and appear on numerous recent reviews of late. I won't post it here on a open forum but if you wish i can pm the information ;)
More of your research huh?
Creepy!!!!
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 18:27
More of your research huh?
Creepy!!!!
Not nearly as creepy as your chat up posts to Irish Josephine today stud :)
See you soon babe ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Not nearly as creepy as your chat up posts to Irish Josephine today stud :)
See you soon babe ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
you dont have to chat up escorts,you idiot! :lmao:
SlickMicky
03-01-18, 18:45
you dont have to chat up escorts,you idiot! :lmao:
Then why did you bother today dumb dumb?