PDA

View Full Version : d.a.d.t



Gaylord
10-09-10, 16:51
A federal judge in the U.S. has said she will issue an order to stop the military's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy, after she declared it "unconstitutional".

U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips ruled that the prohibition on openly gay military service members was unconstitutional because it violates the First and Fifth Amendment rights of gays and lesbians.

Does it matter if you are gay in the military?, how straight do you need to be to pull a trigger?


GL :confused:

texas
10-09-10, 17:07
Homosexuality is incompatible with military service. The presence in the military environment of persons who engage in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrate a propensity to engage in homosexual conduct, seriously impairs the accomplishment of the military mission. The presence of such members adversely affects the ability of the armed forces to maintain discipline, good order, and morale; to foster mutual trust and confidence among service members; to ensure the integrity of the system of rank and command; to facilitate assignment and worldwide deployment of service members who frequently must live and work in close conditions affording minimal privacy; to recruit and retain members of the armed forces; to maintain the public acceptability of military service; and to prevent breaches of security.
DOD Directive 1332.14 (Enlisted Administrative Separations), January, 1981):

Example

USS Iowa turret explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Iowa_turret_explosion)
USS Iowa turret explosion

http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/us_navy_pages/us_navy_battleship_photos/uss_iowa_bb61/17_iowa_turret_2_explosion_apr_19_1989.jpg

Doozer
10-09-10, 17:22
Homosexuality is incompatible with military service. The presence in the military environment of persons who engage in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrate a propensity to engage in homosexual conduct, seriously impairs the accomplishment of the military mission. The presence of such members adversely affects the ability of the armed forces to maintain discipline, good order, and morale; to foster mutual trust and confidence among service members; to ensure the integrity of the system of rank and command; to facilitate assignment and worldwide deployment of service members who frequently must live and work in close conditions affording minimal privacy; to recruit and retain members of the armed forces; to maintain the public acceptability of military service; and to prevent breaches of security.
DOD Directive 1332.14 (Enlisted Administrative Separations), January, 1981):

Example

USS Iowa turret explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Iowa_turret_explosion)
USS Iowa turret explosion

http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/us_navy_pages/us_navy_battleship_photos/uss_iowa_bb61/17_iowa_turret_2_explosion_apr_19_1989.jpg

Bollicks

Nothing wrong with a gay man in the army. What does who you sleep with have to do with how you behave.
Does being agy mean you

Dont follow orders
Dont fit in with your ither officers
Cant have a will to fight

Look at some of teh successful Generals of the past like Alexander the great
They were gay or at least had homosexual tendencies
Alaxander actually made his men have sex with each other because tehn they would die for each other

texas
10-09-10, 18:19
Your spelling and grammar are sub-par.
Have you ever served in a combat unit?
I guess the answer is no.
To maximize the chances of success, the military must defeat the paralyzing effects of fear on the soldier and what the famous Prussian theorist Clausewitz called the "fog of uncertainty." This they do by means of an ethos that stresses morale, discipline, order and cohesion. Anything that threatens the non-sexual bonding that lies at the heart of cohesion adversely affects morale, disciple and order, generating friction. Service by homosexuals poses such a threat, that homosexuality is incompatible with service because it undermines the ethos upon which success depends. Winning wars is the imperative. Indeed, it is the only reason for a society to maintain a military. War is terror and confusion. War is characterized by death, chance, uncertainty and friction. The ethos constitutes an response to these factors—an attempt to defeat their impact. Accordingly, the military stresses virtues such as , physical and moral courage, a sense of honor and duty, discipline, a professional code of conduct, and loyalty. It places a premium on such factors as unit cohesion and morale.
The key of the military ethos is what the Greeks called philia—friendship, comradeship Philia, the bond among disparate individuals who have nothing in common but facing death and terror together, is the source of the unit cohesion that most research has shown to be critical to battlefield success. Philia depends on fairness and the absence of favoritism. Favoritism and double standards are deadly to philia and its associated phenomena—cohesion, morale and discipline—are absolutely critical to the success of a military organization. The presence of homosexuals in the close confines of ships or military units opens the possibility that eros—which unlike philia is sexual, and therefore individual and exclusive—will be unleashed into the environment. Eros manifests itself as sexual competition, protectiveness and favoritism, all of which undermine the nonsexual bonding essential to unit cohesion, good order, discipline and morale. As Sen. James Webb (D., Va.), who was awarded the Navy Cross for valor as a Marine officer in Vietnam, wrote in the Weekly Standard in 1997, "There is no greater or more natural bias than that of an individual toward a beloved. And few emotions are more powerful, or more distracting, than those surrounding the pursuit of, competition for, or the breaking off of amorous relationships."

The destructive impact of such relationships on unit cohesion can be denied only by ideologues.

Does a superior order his or her beloved into danger?
If he or she demonstrates favoritism, what is the consequence for unit morale and discipline?
What happens when jealousy rears its head?

These are questions of life and death, and they help to explain why homosexuality and homosexual behavior traditionally have been considered incompatible with military service.
The reason for excluding open homosexuals from the military has nothing to do with equal rights or freedom of expression. The primary consideration must be military effectiveness.

Doozer
10-09-10, 19:10
Your spelling and grammar are sub-par.
Have you ever served in a combat unit?
I guess the answer is no.
To maximize the chances of success, the military must defeat the paralyzing effects of fear on the soldier and what the famous Prussian theorist Clausewitz called the "fog of uncertainty." This they do by means of an ethos that stresses morale, discipline, order and cohesion. Anything that threatens the non-sexual bonding that lies at the heart of cohesion adversely affects morale, disciple and order, generating friction. Service by homosexuals poses such a threat, that homosexuality is incompatible with service because it undermines the ethos upon which success depends. Winning wars is the imperative. Indeed, it is the only reason for a society to maintain a military. War is terror and confusion. War is characterized by death, chance, uncertainty and friction. The ethos constitutes an response to these factors—an attempt to defeat their impact. Accordingly, the military stresses virtues such as , physical and moral courage, a sense of honor and duty, discipline, a professional code of conduct, and loyalty. It places a premium on such factors as unit cohesion and morale.
The key of the military ethos is what the Greeks called philia—friendship, comradeship Philia, the bond among disparate individuals who have nothing in common but facing death and terror together, is the source of the unit cohesion that most research has shown to be critical to battlefield success. Philia depends on fairness and the absence of favoritism. Favoritism and double standards are deadly to philia and its associated phenomena—cohesion, morale and discipline—are absolutely critical to the success of a military organization. The presence of homosexuals in the close confines of ships or military units opens the possibility that eros—which unlike philia is sexual, and therefore individual and exclusive—will be unleashed into the environment. Eros manifests itself as sexual competition, protectiveness and favoritism, all of which undermine the nonsexual bonding essential to unit cohesion, good order, discipline and morale. As Sen. James Webb (D., Va.), who was awarded the Navy Cross for valor as a Marine officer in Vietnam, wrote in the Weekly Standard in 1997, "There is no greater or more natural bias than that of an individual toward a beloved. And few emotions are more powerful, or more distracting, than those surrounding the pursuit of, competition for, or the breaking off of amorous relationships."

The destructive impact of such relationships on unit cohesion can be denied only by ideologues.

Does a superior order his or her beloved into danger?
If he or she demonstrates favoritism, what is the consequence for unit morale and discipline?
What happens when jealousy rears its head?

These are questions of life and death, and they help to explain why homosexuality and homosexual behavior traditionally have been considered incompatible with military service.
The reason for excluding open homosexuals from the military has nothing to do with equal rights or freedom of expression. The primary consideration must be military effectiveness.

My spelling or typing skills do not effect the argument
As for Combat No I have not fought but yes have been in military

As for your long winded speech it wreeks of Homophobia
Trying to take away the fear of the unknown of soliders-----------Tosh
Trying to cohesivly construct a fighting unit - and this cannot be done with homosexuals------------Bollix
Homosexuals cannot win wars-----------------what are you on?
ccordingly, the military stresses virtues such as , physical and moral courage, a sense of honor and duty, discipline, a professional code of conduct, and loyalty. It places a premium on such factors as unit cohesion and morale. -----------Do you suggest that gays lack these virtues?


Does a superior order his or her beloved into danger?
If he or she demonstrates favoritism, what is the consequence for unit morale and discipline?
What happens when jealousy rears its head? ----------------Does this mean taht women are not also allowed in the military?Are you still living in the 50s?


The reason for excluding open homosexuals from the military has nothing to do with equal rights or freedom of expression. The primary consideration must be military effectiveness.


Absolute BOLLIX

texas
10-09-10, 19:23
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNpWhpyrzvo

Doozer
10-09-10, 19:25
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNpWhpyrzvo

Right so when an army fucks up they try and blame the easiest target gay soldiers
Come Texes I assumed you be smarter than to be caught up in that homophobic nonsense

Doozer
10-09-10, 19:27
I mean I have seen stories wherew straight soldiers fucked up too and many people died
Were they secretly gay ?

texas
11-09-10, 13:36
Opinions of Military Personnel on Sexual Minorities in the Military
ZOGBY INTERNATIONAL
2006

13. Do you agree or disagree with allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the
military?
Strongly Agree 9%
Agree 17
Neutral 32
Agree 26%
Disagree 16
Strongly Disagree 21
Not sure 5
Disagree 37%
Slightly more than one-in-three respondents (37%) disagree that gays should be
allowed to serve openly in the military, while almost three-in-ten (28%) believe they
should. Of those remaining, an almost equivalent amount holds a neutral opinion (32%),
while just 5 percent are unsure.

Table 3. Assumed Impact of Gay/Lesbian Presence on Unit Morale

Personal morale Unit’s morale
Very negative impact 9 15
Somewhat negative impact 29 43
Negative 38 58
No impact 49 26
Somewhat positive impact 1 --
Very positive impact 2 2
Positive 2 2
Not sure 11 14

http://www.palmcenter.org/files/active/0/ZogbyReport.pdf

texas
11-09-10, 13:40
Most US Marines don't want gay roommates: General - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Most-US-Marines-dont-want-gay-roommates-General-/articleshow/6429633.cms)

Another General's view


The top US Marine on Tuesday said most Marines would prefer not to share a room with gay comrades, despite plans by President Barack Obama to lift a ban on gays serving openly in the military.
"I can tell you that an overwhelming majority would like not to be roomed with a person who is openly homosexual," Conway told a Pentagon press conference.



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_LD_Ah5tLKV8/S7LO7iyr1OI/AAAAAAAAEk8/SElaBsWk0G8/s1600/James_Conway_25.jpg

luther
11-09-10, 14:01
Have you ever served in a combat unit?


Have you???

texas
11-09-10, 14:13
Have you???

I have no recollection.

luther
11-09-10, 14:19
I have no recollection.

Perhaps you've been deprogrammed from the trained killer you once were then..........

Obviously only retrained and programed in copy and paste now..........

Your posts on this subject are rubbish............

Gaylord
11-09-10, 14:27
[QUOTE=texas;284957]Most US Marines don't want gay roommates: General - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Most-US-Marines-dont-want-gay-roommates-General-/articleshow/6429633.cms)

Which was the last war the Americans actually won Texas? The point I am trying to make it that with or without gays (openly) in the military, it does not seem to alter the outcome.

And whilst we are talking about morality, was it moral to drop a bomb on Japan (the last war they won)?

Who someone sleeps with does not affect their ability to be a leader or follow orders. How straight do you need to be to push a button/pull a trigger Texas?

I would say that if you are scared about what another man will do to you if they were to see you naked, is more about you rather than them...

GL

luther
11-09-10, 14:33
I would say that if you are scared about what another man will do to you if they were to see you naked, is more about you rather than them...

GL

I'd say you're in the wrong job, you'd have a little bit more to worry about than that...............

Besides, anybody who's ever served in an infantry unit in a hostile enviornment know it's all about watchin each others ass..........:D

texas
11-09-10, 17:31
example

This peron betrayed his country. He has endangered the lives of confidential informants, if he hasn't already caused some death. He knew, before he went into the American military, that he was supposed to keep what he does undercover, but he decided to rebel. Even at the expense of other people's lives.

Bradley Manning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Manning)

Manning is a homosexual{*}
Homosexual Scandal Linked to Treason (http://www.aim.org/aim-report/homosexual-scandal-linked-to-treason/)
FBI question WikiLeaks mother at Welsh home: Agent interrogate 'distressed' woman, then search her son's bedroom | Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1299311/FBI-question-WikiLeaks-mother-Welsh-home-Agent-interrogate-distressed-woman-search-sons-bedroom.html#ixzz0vZS3YNv6)
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/aug/10080312.html


http://www.bradleymanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bradley-Manning-with-Equality-Poster.jpg
http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/ap/attack%20video%20manning%20profile--409020084_v2.grid-4x2.jpg

luther
11-09-10, 17:53
example

This peron betrayed his country. He has endangered the lives of confidential informants, if he hasn't already caused some death. He knew, before he went into the American military, that he was supposed to keep what he does undercover, but he decided to rebel. Even at the expense of other people's lives.

Bradley Manning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Manning)

Manning is a homosexual{*}
Homosexual Scandal Linked to Treason (http://www.aim.org/aim-report/homosexual-scandal-linked-to-treason/)
FBI question WikiLeaks mother at Welsh home: Agent interrogate 'distressed' woman, then search her son's bedroom | Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1299311/FBI-question-WikiLeaks-mother-Welsh-home-Agent-interrogate-distressed-woman-search-sons-bedroom.html#ixzz0vZS3YNv6)
Was Alleged Wikileaks Source a Homosexual with Axe to Grind against U.S. Military? (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/aug/10080312.html)


http://www.bradleymanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bradley-Manning-with-Equality-Poster.jpg
http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/ap/attack%20video%20manning%20profile--409020084_v2.grid-4x2.jpg

And your narrowmindedness leads you to believe he did this as a result of his homosexuality???


apparently held a grudge against the U.S. because of the military’s anti-gay policy.


"It turns out that Manning is an extreme homosexual activist whose fury over the services' homosexual policy may have led him to publicize highly classified documents about the wars."

I find your homophobia here sickening and I believe it has no place on this site...........

I could list thousands of occasions where information has been leaked for many many different reasons. Your arguement for the reasons PFC Bradley E. Manning did this because he was homosexual are weak and spaculative at best, and sad and homophobic at worst...........

A reason why your other profiles were banned if memory serves me correctly...........

Discrimination
We will not tolerate discrimination based on gender, race, nationality or sexuality here. Any posts of a discriminatory nature will be deleted or edited and the offending poster given a warning or banned, depending on the gravity of the situation.

texas
11-09-10, 21:02
Its not proven at present that his Homosexuality is a factor in his grand treason.

We will hear all the details at PFC Mannings court martial.

Then we will see the truth of his motive.

Gaylord
12-09-10, 00:39
Texas is entitled to have an opinion Luther, @ the moment it does not to be his opinion, but as stated earlier by another, more cut and paste..

But right now I see no homophobia, just a difference of opinions...what do you think?

Oh and Texas, God is all about love!


GL ;)

vampirejackie
12-09-10, 10:39
Texas is entitled to have an opinion Luther, @ the moment it does not to be his opinion, but as stated earlier by another, more cut and paste..

But right now I see no homophobia, just a difference of opinions...what do you think?

Oh and Texas, God is all about love!


GL ;)

I would have to disagree Galylord, he is being homophobic, and it has been dealt with. :)

luther
12-09-10, 15:16
Texas is entitled to have an opinion Luther, @ the moment it does not to be his opinion, but as stated earlier by another, more cut and paste..

But right now I see no homophobia, just a difference of opinions...what do you think?

Oh and Texas, God is all about love!


GL ;)

Yes GL, I realise he's just a copy and paste troll but this is not the first time I've seen this tripe from this guy.........

Gaylord
12-09-10, 22:50
ok..

GL

dublin laddie
29-11-10, 20:18
example

This peron betrayed his country. He has endangered the lives of confidential informants, if he hasn't already caused some death. He knew, before he went into the American military, that he was supposed to keep what he does undercover, but he decided to rebel. Even at the expense of other people's lives.

Bradley Manning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Manning)

Manning is a homosexual{*}
Homosexual Scandal Linked to Treason (http://www.aim.org/aim-report/homosexual-scandal-linked-to-treason/)
FBI question WikiLeaks mother at Welsh home: Agent interrogate 'distressed' woman, then search her son's bedroom | Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1299311/FBI-question-WikiLeaks-mother-Welsh-home-Agent-interrogate-distressed-woman-search-sons-bedroom.html#ixzz0vZS3YNv6)
Was Alleged Wikileaks Source a Homosexual with Axe to Grind against U.S. Military? | LifeSiteNews.com (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/aug/10080312.html)


http://www.bradleymanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bradley-Manning-with-Equality-Poster.jpg
http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/ap/attack%20video%20manning%20profile--409020084_v2.grid-4x2.jpg

The word on the street is that PFC Manning is also responable
for the 260,000 diplomatic cables, to the whistleblower website Wikileaks


He is in the Quantico detention facility since July 31 in solitary confinement
I wonder what his trial will reveal regarding he's motive?????

Mousey
29-11-10, 22:13
Remember the Spartans? They had same-sex relationships in their army - it was positively encouraged for older soldiers to "educate" a younger one in all manner of things. They weren't gay insofar as they had monogamous same-sex lifepartners, but there was an awful lot of rogering going on. It didn't hurt their martial prowess in any way.

Nowadays the situation is different. Society sees homosexuality as iffy, and pederasty might as well mean the same thing as paedophilia. Therefore, I don't think that it's a good idea for gay men to be permitted to join the military openly, because of the intolerance that would be shown them by the vast majority of the rest of the army. Some nutter with a rifle and an intolerance for an openly gay man he's bunking with doesn't bear thinking about.