View Full Version : [Solved] worst number of neg, reviews, beat this if you can
wanted the best 69
13-08-10, 17:36
Dublin Independent Escort: Latifah
ok, check it out, then think to your self, why in the name god would still keep going, retire girl, :D:D:D:D
Escort Reviews of Latifah, Irish escort from Escort Ireland (https://www.escort-ireland.com/934/escort/Latifah/escort-reviews.html)
wanted the best 69
13-08-10, 18:02
thank you luther, i always bugger that link thing up,
Ahh..you are being too harsh... she looks like a lovely girl.
why in the name god would still keep going, retire girl, :D:D:D:D
Take a closer look at the content of reviews and reviewers and tell me what you think is happening here.
One reason why girls do opt out if there ever was one and its not the reason your thinking. ;)
Lucy Chambers
13-08-10, 21:03
I thought the same thing. Three reviews with 1 report each...
Sensual Delights
13-08-10, 21:15
One of them is from "le_pimp_pat" :wtf: , this is a really trusty name for a reviewer :lmao:
ok there is shit where you have people putting in bad reviews and bad reviews do reflect badly on business, but I would never go to an un verified escort, i got burned too often
Dublin Independent Escort: Latifah
ok, check it out, then think to your self, why in the name god would still keep going, retire girl, :D:D:D:D
I havnt read the negatives but who is to say that some of them turned out bad due to the clients own fault? Its also a bit unfair to put this up knowing full well that the girl isnt registered and cant comment on this.
Westside.
Some seem to have a theme of very bad grammer,possibly the same person with a grudge with the lady in question..or a pimp that is trying to ruin her business....
Lucy Chambers
13-08-10, 21:57
I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?
I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?
There will always be a few that unfortuantly fall thru the net...it happens but they could have any number of reviews submitted in day,alot by timewasters...
This is why guys you should read the reviews rather than just look to see if they're positive or negative. 1 of the neg reviews are actually positive but the knuckle head chose the wrong options. The other 4 are clearly fake and they should be deleted.
Lucy Chambers
13-08-10, 22:12
There will always be a few that unfortuantly fall thru the net...it happens but they could have any number of reviews submitted in day,alot by timewasters...
But Aml...surely those particular reports were submitted over a three month period? And were doubly highlighted today? Profiles seem to be suspended in seconds, why can't rats magically appear?
This is why guys you should read the reviews rather than just look to see if they're positive or negative. 1 of the neg reviews are actually positive but the knuckle head chose the wrong options. The other 3 are clearly fake and the should be deleted.
Possibly a review revamp would solve it...they are prob not the only 3 reviews classed as legit,i heard the other day from a member that one of their reviews was ratted even though it was legit.
I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?
Not trying to shift blame or anything, but just to point out, the majority of these reviews were submitted prior to the introduction of review moderators........
Lucy Chambers
13-08-10, 22:53
Ah, ok. I didn't realise. Surely she deserves a bit of post mod ratting then?
Possibly a review revamp would solve it...
Again, I'd say you'll find there have been a good few changes to the review system since the majority of these reviews were submitted........
Ah, ok. I didn't realise. Surely she deserves a bit of post mod ratting then?
I don't think it would be practical Lucy. It may not be fair, but there are literally thousands or reviews since the introduction of review mods, and changes to the review system. I guess the best we could hope for is an improvement in the system moving forward, which I think we have seen.........
I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?
Maybe there was no reviews mods or ratting in existance when they were submitted? Reviews mods are a fairly new concept here.
Westside.
Maybe there was no reviews mods or ratting in existance when they were submitted? Reviews mods are a fairly new concept here.
Westside.
Wow, thanks West. Wish I'd thought of that last night..............:rolleyes:
Maybe there was no reviews mods or ratting in existance when they were submitted? Reviews mods are a fairly new concept here.
Westside.
A bit of an echo here today eh eh eh lol
A bit of an echo here today eh eh eh lol
I didnt read any of luthers posts here.
Until now,
Westside.
I didnt read any of luthers posts here.
Until now,
Westside.
Seems to be a common problem. Perhaps you should read all posts in a thread before replying since the same answer had already been posted just above yours........
Seems to be a common problem. Perhaps you should read all posts in a thread before replying since the same answer had already been posted just above yours........
I didnt really think it was big deal to be honest. If someone posts the same thing ,its no big deal.
Westside.
Just a thought............:shrug:...........:)
thehighwayman
14-08-10, 18:43
I've updated her reviews to fall in line with current rules. She's still advertising here so it's not fair those reviews would stand. The 3 first time reviews wouldn't get published as their simply insults rather than a review. Brat169s review has been changed to positive. If you read it, it's a positive review and looks like a mistake on his part in not choosing the right drop down options. This was his second review of the escort. I looked at the deleted first review and all the choices were very satisfied etc.
I've been going over old reviews since I started so she's not getting any special treatment if anyone thinks that.
Lucy Chambers
14-08-10, 19:04
Thanks Highwayman..that is fair.
wanted the best 69
16-08-10, 10:28
well,
what can say, when i first listed this, i thought it a bit of a laugh, i now feel i was wrong,but if for no other reason at least she now has had her reviews checked and in some cases changed, this i am glad for her, it does make me wonder how many old reviews belonging to other escorts are also like this?