View Full Version : Posting Multiple reviews of same girl - Suggestion
I have noticed that there have been a number of posts as regards multiple reviews of the same girl by the same guy. As I post a lot of reviews, but never of the same girl, but I do see a lot of girls regularly, I would like to suggest the following rule changes and to get members opinions of same:-
1. Reviewers are allowed to post 'update' reviews after an agreed period of time say 3 or 6 months (I think this is helpful as it allows punters get an up to date perspective)
2. If differing services were availed of on most recent visit, or indeed if a different type of encounter e.g say sex toys or you visited as a couple, this would be allowed as a review in it's own rite.
MrF
I have noticed that there have been a number of posts as regards multiple reviews of the same girl by the same guy. I post a lot of reviews, never of the same girl, but I do see a lot of girls regularly, so I would like to suggest the following rule changes and to get members opinions of same:-
1. Reviewers are allowed to post 'update' reviews after an agreed period of time say 3 or 6 months (I think this is helpful as it allows punters get an up to date perspective)
2. If differing services were availed of on most recent visit, or indeed if a different type of encounter e.g say sex toys or you visited as a couple, this would be allowed as a review in it's own rite.
MrF
naughty_g5
08-08-10, 23:16
very valid points. E-I should update rules around multiple reviews
I think multiple reviews in some shape or format should be allowed. I would go along with Mr F's suggestion of an update on the authors last review. This will be of significant help to the punters because if Mr F or any of the other top / frequent reviewers have 2/3 updates of the same escort - then she has to be worth consideration for a visit. B
, but I do see a lot of girls regularly,
you dirty dirty man lol
by the way i agree with your idea
But we already only allow the latest review of the same escort by the same guy, the older one is deleted already, am I missing something here?
1. Reviewers are allowed to post 'update' reviews after an agreed period of time say 3 or 6 months (I think this is helpful as it allows punters get an up to date perspective)
This is already the case.........
Can I review the same escort more than once?
The maximum number of reviews a client can make of the same escort is one. If you review an escort for a second time, your latest review will be published and the previous one will be removed. Provision will made for cases where a review changes from positive to negative or visa versa.
FAQs & Rules about the Escort Ireland Irish Escort Reviews System (https://www.escort-ireland.com/reviews/faq.html)
But we already only allow the latest review of the same escort by the same guy, the older one is deleted already, am I missing something here?
Snap.........Today 01:11.......:D
No you're right John, this is alredy the case.........
It seems i read mr fussy post differently i thought what he is suggesting is that if you review a lady , you can leave another review of the same lady after a set amount of time eg 3/6 months so punters can have wider spectrum of same lady maybe improved services. Both reviews would be visible . I might be wrong and maybe mr fussy will clarify (i have drank a lot of alcohol,)
It seems i read mr fussy post differently i thought what he is suggesting is that if you review a lady , you can leave another review of the same lady after a set amount of time eg 3/6 months so punters can have wider spectrum of same lady maybe improved services. Both reviews would be visible . I might be wrong and maybe mr fussy will clarify (i have drank a lot of alcohol,)
I am suggesting that the last review is not replaced if a certain amount of time has elapsed e.g 3 or 6 months or if other services have been tried.
I am suggesting that the last review is not replaced if a certain amount of time has elapsed e.g 3 or 6 months or if other services have been tried.
Dont really see the need for this MrF. Knowing the rules while posting your update, if you do not want to lose content from previous review include it in the updated review also..
vampirejackie
09-08-10, 10:37
Hi Mr Fussy
Thanks for this. I have noted down these ideas. We have already been discussing point 2 ourselves as an idea.
VJ
x
Dont really see the need for this MrF. Knowing the rules while posting your update, if you do not want to lose content from previous review include it in the updated review also..
Exactly. Otherwise it's just an excuse to rack up extra reviews for the reviewer and the reviewed..........
Just so you know Jackie. This is a duplicate thread and this is also being discussed here...........
https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/reviews-chat/46386-posting-multiple-reviews-same-girl-suggestion.html
Dont really see the need for this MrF. Knowing the rules while posting your update, if you do not want to lose content from previous review include it in the updated review also..
I think it useful to have access to previous reviews, rather than remove them. I would like to see either a link to these previous reviews or the actual historical reviews appear as I read the most recent one. I think this would be useful, by virtue of your suggestion for the reviewer to copy relevant section from previous reviews I assume you think this is also useful.
Exactly. Otherwise it's just an excuse to rack up extra reviews for the reviewer and the reviewed..........
I don't expect these subsequent reviews to be used in Reviewers or Escorts stats.
Just so you know Jackie. This is a duplicate thread and this is also being discussed here...........
https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/reviews-chat/46386-posting-multiple-reviews-same-girl-suggestion.html
I've posted an updae under the Review forum, can someone close this one please?
Thanks,
MrF
I think it useful to have access to previous reviews, rather than remove them. I would like to see either a link to these previous reviews or the actual historical reviews appear as I read the most recent one. I think this would be useful, by virtue of your suggestion for the reviewer to copy relevant section from previous reviews I assume you think this is also useful.
I don't expect these subsequent reviews to be used in Reviewers or Escorts stats.
You can add a comment to your reviews as it is (I'm sure you know that anyway). I've seen guys do it before. If you have anything useful to add you can use this. I don't think there's a need for a rule change.
You can add a comment to your reviews as it is (I'm sure you know that anyway). I've seen guys do it before. If you have anything useful to add you can use this. I don't think there's a need for a rule change.
I like reading the reviews so I'd like to be able to read a guy's previous reviews of the same escort to get a complete picture. I know I can cut and paste from my previous reviews or add comments etc. What I am suggesting is not to remove the previous reviews...no confusion from people as regards where has my review gone etc. and a full history of what a guy has to say about a particular girl. The comments facility I don't access anymore as usually the comment is 'Activated by.....'
I think it useful to have access to previous reviews, rather than remove them. I would like to see either a link to these previous reviews or the actual historical reviews appear as I read the most recent one. I think this would be useful, by virtue of your suggestion for the reviewer to copy relevant section from previous reviews I assume you think this is also useful.
But prior to you putting up a new review to the same escort you do have access to the first or most recent one........
I've suggested this before, if someone is putting up a new review of the same girl then I think they could say that this is their second review, and say that XY or Z is now avaliable or not available or whatever........
I don't expect these subsequent reviews to be used in Reviewers or Escorts stats.
I would imagine this to be technically difficult. If that appear on the profile that will be included in the overall stats.........
What I am suggesting is not to remove the previous reviews...no confusion from people as regards where has my review gone etc. and a full history of what a guy has to say about a particular girl.
But this is why it was decided to limit it to one review. Ohterwise you have situations where the same person is reviewing the same escort multiple times................
There is no confusion. It's a simple rule that people should know about at this stage. One review per client per escort...........
Just wondering if one escort had multiple reviews deleted and the new rule accepting multiple reviews comes back If the escort had reviews unders those rules "1. Reviewers are allowed to post 'update' reviews after an agreed period of time say 3 or 6 months (I think this is helpful as it allows punters get an up to date perspective)
2. If differing services were availed of on most recent visit, or indeed if a different type of encounter e.g say sex toys or you visited as a couple, this would be allowed as a review in it's own rite." is she going to have her multiple deleted reviews back?
But this is why it was decided to limit it to one review. Ohterwise you have situations where the same person is reviewing the same escort multiple times................
There is no confusion. It's a simple rule that people should know about at this stage. One review per client per escort...........
My suggestion was to allow another review subject to criteria e.g. after a suitable time period e.g 3 or 6 months....
Or when other services were tried e.g. couple experience, A, sex toys etc.
Thanks Luther, youv'e made your point that you do not agree, it's only a suggestion but it needs to be based on some criteria such as examples above.
My suggestion was to allow another review subject to criteria e.g. after a suitable time period e.g 3 or 6 months....
I understand that but this was thrashed out ages ago. There was debates and polls and threads about it all over the place and the current rules are what was decided on...........
Or when other services were tried e.g. couple experience, A, sex toys etc.
This is the point of allowing another review to replace an older review. So that changes can be noted.........
Thanks Luther, youv'e made your point that you do not agree, it's only a suggestion but it needs to be based on some criteria such as examples above.
I'm not disagreeing with you here just for the sake of it. I have no problem if people want change, as long as it's for a good reason. Personally at the moment I don't think it needs to be changed but of course if enough people want it I'm sure it would be considered.........
Like I say, I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just letting you know what was decided on a while back.............
I understand that but this was thrashed out ages ago. There was debates and polls and threads about it all over the place and the current rules are what was decided on...........
This is the point of allowing another review to replace an older review. So that changes can be noted.........
I'm not disagreeing with you here just for the sake of it. I have no problem if people want change, as long as it's for a good reason. Personally at the moment I don't think it needs to be changed but of course if enough people want it I'm sure it would be considered.........
Like I say, I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just letting you know what was decided on a while back.............
I know what was decided a while ago, decisions can and should be reviewed periodically, hence my post to gauge feelings. Looks like a non starter...but there you go....
naughty_g5
09-08-10, 21:44
I would imagine this to be technically difficult. If that appear on the profile that will be included in the overall stats.........
ahhh, should not be difficult.
using distinct keyword in sql should sort this out. I presume E-I would have DBA to manage database, should take him 5 minutes to write sql to achieve this....
as an example, below query will give you list of distinct reviewers, all you need to a procedure to get a sum.
select distinct (reviewer) from reviews where escort = 'abc'
ofcourse this would have knock on affects, as E-I is also sorting reviews and so on, but definitely achievable.
naughty_g5
09-08-10, 21:54
what I like about MrFussy's idea is that he has placed minimum time gap between 2 reviews. This should sort out problem of multiple rat reviews of same escort by, lets say well wisher.
for someone like me, I have only 4 reviews, there are plenty of ladies I have not met, but someone like MrFussy, he should be allowed to express his experience if he sees an escort twice after considerable period of time.
It sounds like a reasonable idea to me. Not counting extra reviews in the statistics is feasible. Like many things, it's a question of whether Pat can be persuaded to assign the job to one of her staff.
naughty_g5
09-08-10, 22:22
I feel current system is prone to human error. Task of checking for duplicate reviews should be automated before it is further complicated. Let moderators activate the review, but if they start duplicate checks manually with rules as complicated as suggested on this thread, we will have new threads coming up why my reviews were deleted. previous review was 180 days 2 minutes older than latest review.
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 09:35
I would imagine if we do bring in a new rule, it will be moving forward only, rather than going back.
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 09:51
I have merged two threads on this, as its the same discussion.
I would imagine if we do bring in a new rule, it will be moving forward only, rather than going back.
All new rules apply to the future but interestingly when the new rule about one review only from the same reviewer was brought instead of moving forward it was applied to the past as well and escorts that had multiple reviews had them deleted. I am not going to fight for reviews I just think that if now multiple reviews were going to be allowed after escorts had theirs removed would be unfair.
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 11:08
All new rules apply to the future but interestingly when the new rule about one review only from the same reviewer was brought instead of moving forward it was applied to the past as well and escorts that had multiple reviews had them deleted. I am not going to fight for reviews I just think that if now multiple reviews were going to be allowed after escorts had theirs removed would be unfair.
Fair point, I didnt know that this other rule was applied retrospectively.
Don't see the point in changing it (back :rolleyes:), all the options needed are there, Availed of additional services, right a new review and mention your first, wish to comment that the lady has changed something on her profile or is no longer the lady you saw, submit a fake pic report and/or leave a comment on your original review, review went from pos to neg or vice versa, right a new review and both will be posted.. Only reason I can see someone really wanting this is to increase their review count to boost their ego or boost the review count of a lady you like..
All this aside Jasmin has a very valid point, how many of the reviews that have already been deleted would fall under this proposed new rule and that cannot be reinstated which wouldn't be fair at all..
BTW, no reason why you can't copy and paste your old review into the new one if you want to have it still visible..
Navillus04
10-08-10, 12:02
Don't see the point in changing it (back :rolleyes:), all the options needed are there, Availed of additional services, right a new review and mention your first, wish to comment that the lady has changed something on her profile or is no longer the lady you saw, submit a fake pic report and/or leave a comment on your original review, review went from pos to neg or vice versa, right a new review and both will be posted.. Only reason I can see someone really wanting this is to increase their review count to boost their ego or boost the review count of a lady you like..
All this aside Jasmin has a very valid point, how many of the reviews that have already been deleted would fall under this proposed new rule and that cannot be reinstated which wouldn't be fair at all..
BTW, no reason why you can't copy and paste your old review into the new one if you want to have it still visible..
Totally agree with what you have said Anon
One thing i would like to query though and you might not necessarily know, but WRT your last point about copying and pasting your old review into the new one, could the review mods not delete this and deem it unnecessary as they do have the ability to edit reviews and might be of the stance that you are trying to pull a fast one by including the previous review you wrote? Or would the mods only edit a review when names, places, numbers, sexually explicit language is used when an escort prefers it wouldnt etc are included?
Just a thought
Mods opinions very welcome too
All this aside Jasmin has a very valid point, how many of the reviews that have already been deleted would fall under this proposed new rule and that cannot be reinstated which wouldn't be fair at all..
No reviews were deleted when the new rule came in. They were just made invisible to everyone except the author (and, I assume, to the escort and to the reviews mods). So there's no reason they couldn't be restored.
No reviews were deleted when the new rule came in. They were just made invisible to everyone except the author (and, I assume, to the escort and to the reviews mods). So there's no reason they couldn't be restored.No, the vast majority if not all were deleted. Please check your facts before contradicting me!! it's only when a question arouse that this came to light and I'm not sure if they stopped deleting them or not! Only reviews from ladies that opted out are still available.
No, the vast majority if not all were deleted. Please check your facts before contradicting me!! it's only when a question arouse that this came to light and I'm not sure if they stopped deleting them or not! Only reviews from ladies that opted out are still available.
I looked at one before I posted. So I did check my facts before contradicting you. What made you assume I hadn't?
I looked at one before I posted. So I did check my facts before contradicting you. What made you assume I hadn't?Like I said, I wasn't sure if they stopped deleting them but the vast majority were deleted, it's only very recently they stopped deleting them, I'm sure a mod will confirm this!! :p
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 13:09
Reviews are not physically deleted from the system, they are still there, they are just changed in status so they cannot be viewed.
Reviews are not physically deleted from the system, they are still there, they are just changed in status so they cannot be viewed.I'm very surprised with this reply as I clearly remember the reviews mod stating that they were deleting the reviews in the begining and it's only recently they were merely changing their status, can you please re-confirm this taking note what you have said is only the current situation..
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 13:17
I'm very surprised with this reply as I clearly remember the reviews mod stating that they were deleting the reviews in the begining and it's only recently they were merely changing their status, can you please re-confirm this taking note what you have said is only the current situation..
How far back are you talking here?
How far back are you talking here?Look at my profile, how many delted reviews can you see as I had at least 3 duplicate reviews deleted as a test case, this was middle to begining of last year when this came to light..
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 13:26
Look at my profile, how many delted reviews can you see as I had at least 3 duplicate reviews deleted as a test case, this was middle to begining of last year when this came to light..
sent u a pm
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 14:37
After some extensive digging etc, I have found that there were reviews permanently deleted, which we would not be able to retreive.
Anon361, you are correct , i bow to you! ;)
After some extensive digging etc, I have found that there were reviews permanently deleted, which we would not be able to retreive.
Anon361, you are correct , i bow to you! ;)
Babe, you bow to no man, I kneel before you and :kiss: your feet ;)
El Gordo, whenever your ready ;) :p
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 15:00
Babe, you bow to no man, I kneel before you and :kiss: your feet ;)
El Gordo, whenever your ready ;) :p
Not me feet, hate my feet being touched! lol
Not me feet, hate my feet being touched! lol
I can aim higher if you like :o
vampirejackie
10-08-10, 15:02
I can aim higher if you like :o
hee hee, down boy down! ;)
Don't see the point in changing it (back :rolleyes:), all the options needed are there, Availed of additional services, right a new review and mention your first, wish to comment that the lady has changed something on her profile or is no longer the lady you saw, submit a fake pic report and/or leave a comment on your original review, review went from pos to neg or vice versa, right a new review and both will be posted.. Only reason I can see someone really wanting this is to increase their review count to boost their ego or boost the review count of a lady you like..
All this aside Jasmin has a very valid point, how many of the reviews that have already been deleted would fall under this proposed new rule and that cannot be reinstated which wouldn't be fair at all..
BTW, no reason why you can't copy and paste your old review into the new one if you want to have it still visible..
PLEASE NOTE previous comment on this thread....
I don't expect these subsequent reviews to be used in Reviewers or Escorts stats.
After some extensive digging etc, I have found that there were reviews permanently deleted, which we would not be able to retreive.
Anon361, you are correct , i bow to you! ;)
I must admit, this is news to me. When the term deleted was used in this way, I assumed it meant deleted from view, not from existance. I thought all these reviews still existed in the archives???
I must admit, this is news to me. When the term deleted was used in this way, I assumed it meant deleted from view, not from existance. I thought all these reviews still existed in the archives???
Can you start another post as regards deleted reviews and where they end up. Can you start another thread as regards where Jackie wants to get bitten. Can you moderate this thread?
Can you start another post as regards deleted reviews and where they end up. Can you start another thread as regards where Jackie wants to get bitten. Can you moderate this thread?
Are you ber lol
Can you start another post as regards deleted reviews and where they end up.
No, I believe it's in keeping with the subject in hand as if what you wanted to happen was applied retrospectively, it would of course matter if these reviews were still available to be reinstated...........
Can you start another thread as regards where Jackie wants to get bitten.
No, it's nothing to do with me..........
Can you moderate this thread?
No, I'm not a moderator...........
Anything else???
No, I believe it's in keeping with the subject in hand as if what you wanted to happen was applied retrospectively, it would of course matter if these reviews were still available to be reinstated...........
No, it's nothing to do with me..........
No, I'm not a moderator...........
Anything else???
Only 1 point, WHY are you posting, nothing to do you with you so Fuck off.
Only 1 point, WHY are you posting, nothing to do you with you so Fuck off.
oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Only 1 point, WHY are you posting, nothing to do you with you so Fuck off.
Tut tut tut................Not very nice..........
I'm a member of this community and entitled to post on any subject I choose............
Now I've been nothing but courtious to you on this thread. I've discussed what you proposed and posted help when I could. If nothing else, I've kept this thread active for you so that others ,may see it and perhaps give their opinion otherwise it may it may just have slipped away unnoticed, dispite the fact that you thought yourself so important as to post it twice, in two different sections and this is how you respond to me???
By telling me it has nothing to do with me and to fuck off???
saw this and thought of you Mr Fussy lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD-xxoQwOo4
Tut tut tut................Not very nice..........
I'm a member of this community and entitled to post on any subject I choose............
Now I've been nothing but courtious to you on this thread. I've discussed what you proposed and posted help when I could. If nothing else, I've kept this thread active for you so that others ,may see it and perhaps give their opinion otherwise it may it may just have slipped away unnoticed, dispite the fact that you thought yourself so important as to post it twice, in two different sections and this is how you respond to me???
By telling me it has nothing to do with me and to fuck off???
You have posted your opinion...a number of times...
I have asked you to close the other thread...nothing to do with my importance...
Can you give other people a chance to air their views and maybe give you time to Moderate, rather than post...
Oops..just an afterthought...maybe you and Vampire could co-ordinate and actually moderate, maybe off thread posts even...such as on this one...such as navel gazing etc...
I have asked you to close the other thread...nothing to do with my importance...
And I've told you, I'm not a moderator so I can't close the other thread...........
Can you give other people a chance to air their views
Any as far as I know there is no limit to the amount of posts that can be posted by different members on the forum at any one time, so my posting has no bearing on allowing others to post their opinions..........
Don't tell me, you're so polite, you wait for a moment where others aren't posting to give your opinion so as not to interupt them???
Ya, you're displayed your manners here to me already............:rolleyes:
maybe give you time to Moderate, rather than post...
Again, I'm not a moderator...........
Hmmm............not so smart for a man of the law.................:rolleyes:
You have posted your opinion...a number of times...
I have asked you to close the other thread...nothing to do with my importance...
Can you give other people a chance to air their views and maybe give you time to Moderate, rather than post...
WTF?? Luther's not a mod anymore!!
Oops..just an afterthought...maybe you and Vampire could co-ordinate and actually moderate, maybe off thread posts even...such as on this one...such as navel gazing etc...
Holy shit, you're just not getting it. Did you bang your head earlier???
Here, I'll put this as large and clear as I can...........
I am not a moderator here......
Luther maybe you should start modding again. I must admit that I get confused sometimes. It would help everyone, espcially MrF!
THANKS
(Goes up even further in my opinion)
Can a MOD please ensure that a MOD does not divert my thread...Jackie for instance
THANKS
(Goes up even further in my opinion)
Can a MOD please ensure that a MOD does not divert my thread...Jackie for instance
Did your dad beat you when you were growing up MrF? Was he a mod??
Did your dad beat you when you were growing up MrF? Was he a mod??
Beat me senseless Debest...and other things...I am wronged as a person.
naughty_g5
10-08-10, 21:57
holy shit!!! this is getting personal here.
This was very sensible thread started with a very sensible suggestion. The best thing to do here, IN MY OPINION, is for some one with power to say, good suggestion. Allow us to discuss this internally within E-I and we will let you know if decision.
we can have one of the three outcomes
1) Idea is implemented as it is
2) idea is implemented with changes as found suitable to E-I management
3) Idea is discarded
I say above because I feel E-I should encourage its users and advertisers to come with suggestions. Its the right way to go. I am not saying, every suggestion has to be implemented, but it is not good idea to make users feel you should not post your suggestions here.
Everyone has opinion and is entitled to voice it, everybody does not have to like the idea put up by MrFussy, but lets not make this personal.
Back to the subject,
After some extensive digging etc, I have found that there were reviews permanently deleted, which we would not be able to retreive.
This is truly bizarre. I don't mean it's bizarre that staff (or mods, I'm not sure which) were doing that. It's bizarre that the system would allow them to delete reviews rather than just making them invisible. What happens, for example, if it is discovered later that a review was deleted in error? There's no way to get it back? What I am really struggling to understand is why anyone would design things that way. The full text of all the reviews on the system is less than 10MB. You can buy a 1TB hard disk for about €100.00. So 10MB costs about one tenth of a cent. Someone really thought the risk of accidentally deleting a review with no possibility of recovery was worth it, in order to save a tenth of a cent? Where does Pat find her IT people?
Back to the subject,
This is truly bizarre. I don't mean it's bizarre that staff (or mods, I'm not sure which) were doing that. It's bizarre that the system would allow them to delete reviews rather than just making them invisible. What happens, for example, if it is discovered later that a review was deleted in error? There's no way to get it back? What I am really struggling to understand is why anyone would design things that way. The full text of all the reviews on the system is less than 10MB. You can buy a 1TB hard disk for about €100.00. So 10MB costs about one tenth of a cent. Someone really thought the risk of accidentally deleting a review with no possibility of recovery was worth it, in order to save a tenth of a cent? Where does Pat find her IT people?Couldn't evem muster a sorry Anon for ever doubting you, were you and MrF tarred from the same brush :rolleyes:
Couldn't evem muster a sorry Anon for ever doubting you, were you and MrF tarred from the same brush :rolleyes:
You told me to check my facts before contradicting you. I had checked them as best I could, by looking for my old duplicate reviews and checking that they were still there. You were right that reviews have been deleted and I was wrong, but I honestly don't see why you think you are owed an apology.
You told me to check my facts before contradicting you. I had checked them as best I could, by looking for my old duplicate reviews and checking that they were still there. You were right that reviews have been deleted and I was wrong, but I honestly don't see why you think you are owed an apology.Jeez Gordo, lighten up, it's just a bit of heckling. I think it was more human error than anything that caused the reviews to be deleted, like most things, there's a right and a wrong way and unfortunately when they started to delete the reviews they were shown the wrong way..
vampirejackie
11-08-10, 09:46
THANKS
(Goes up even further in my opinion)
Can a MOD please ensure that a MOD does not divert my thread...Jackie for instance
Im not a moderator I am a Manager! :p
vampirejackie
11-08-10, 09:48
holy shit!!! this is getting personal here.
This was very sensible thread started with a very sensible suggestion. The best thing to do here, IN MY OPINION, is for some one with power to say, good suggestion. Allow us to discuss this internally within E-I and we will let you know if decision.
we can have one of the three outcomes
1) Idea is implemented as it is
2) idea is implemented with changes as found suitable to E-I management
3) Idea is discarded
I say above because I feel E-I should encourage its users and advertisers to come with suggestions. Its the right way to go. I am not saying, every suggestion has to be implemented, but it is not good idea to make users feel you should not post your suggestions here.
Everyone has opinion and is entitled to voice it, everybody does not have to like the idea put up by MrFussy, but lets not make this personal.
Excellent post ....i have already said we are looking at this, but nobody seemed to take any notice! :p
Excellent post ....i have already said we are looking at this, but nobody seemed to take any notice! :p
I noticed jackie
naughty_g5
11-08-10, 18:08
Excellent post ....i have already said we are looking at this, but nobody seemed to take any notice! :p
I noticed, you were inspiration for my post:hug:
back to topic, is this going to be discussed in your next staff meeting?
vampirejackie
12-08-10, 09:13
I noticed, you were inspiration for my post:hug:
back to topic, is this going to be discussed in your next staff meeting?
I will make a commitment that we will make a decision and come back to you by the end of next week.
i will make a commitment that we will make a decision and come back to you by the end of next week.
lol...........
lol...........
Now that's lawyer talk!
Now that's lawyer talk!
Lawyer talk is...we don't know at this point how much the litigation is going to cost but we recommend following this course of action until we can ascertain whether the action has a reasonable chance of success, at that point we recommend a review meeting to discuss our costs to date....and how muuch you owe us...
Lawyer talk is...we don't know at this point how much the litigation is going to cost but we recommend following this course of action until we can ascertain whether the action has a reasonable chance of success, at that point we recommend a review meeting to discuss our costs to date....and how muuch you owe us...
I want to be a lawyer now.....
I want to be a lawyer now.....
I want to employ the one that gave MrFussy that speech, or did he just read it on a newspaper cartoon:confused:
I want to be a lawyer now.....
We take your application seriously, whilst we consider your qualifications to be more than adequate, we do not feel that you have the necessary skill set for our organisation. We thank you for your interest and wish you every success in your future endeavours....
I want to employ the one that gave MrFussy that speech, or did he just read it on a newspaper cartoon:confused:
You in some sort of trouble then?
We take your application seriously, whilst we consider your qualifications to be more than adequate, we do not feel that you have the necessary skill set for our organisation. We thank you for your interest and wish you every success in your future endeavours....
It was the leather pants wasn't it?
I want to employ the one that gave MrFussy that speech, or did he just read it on a newspaper cartoon:confused:
We take note of your many threads and in particular the few that have any meaning, for these few we wish to express our thanks. In addition we would like to take this opportunity to point out that your moniker is incorrect...you are not an alphamale...you convey no alphamale attributes, actually the opposite....lonely useless male is a more apt signature...
I want to be a lawyer now.....
To be a good lawyer you need to have intelligence, writing skills and a good knowledge of the law.
You’ve got a bit of work to do Debest, but best of luck to ya anyway…
We take note of your many threads and in particular the few that have any meaning, for these few we wish to express our thanks. In addition we would like to take this opportunity to point out that your moniker is incorrect...you are not an alphamale...you convey no alphamale attributes, actually the opposite....lonely useless male is a more apt signature...
For those who are confused this was for Anon not me. I do convey some alphamale attributes.
To be a good lawyer you need to have intelligence, writing skills and a good knowledge of the law.
You’ve got a bit of work to do Debest, but best of luck to ya anyway…
Stop taking the thread off topic!! I'll get Ber to sort your shit right out!!
It was the leather pants wasn't it?
We wish to point out that your insistence in wearing leather pants (see detailed description in Appendix 2a) only served to highlight the case of the prosecution that you had an ingrowing penis. We were unable to pursue the case in light of any evidence of substance....
To be a good lawyer you need to have intelligence, writing skills and a good knowledge of the law.
You’ve got a bit of work to do Debest, but best of luck to ya anyway…
Clearly you've never seen 'My cousin Vinny'. I think that's the one....Joe Pesci.
We wish to point out that your insistence in wearing leather pants (see detailed description in Appendix 2a) only served to highlight the case of the prosecution that you had an ingrowing penis. We were unable to pursue the case in light of any evidence of substance....
Now I've nothing to say....
Now I've nothing to say....
We did proceed on the basis of the search warrant (Little2001) to obtain clothing and other material pertinant to the case in question. Analysis of the stains on Exhibit 1 would give rise to the inference that said clothing was worn for a number of days or that the defendant had a masturbation fixation....
any one here think Mr Fussy (who i totally respect as the review master) and Anon (who i totally respect as the intelligent post master) should get a room together with the best two escorts on the board and sort out their differences (and video it for Ber and Westside)
any one here think Mr Fussy (who i totally respect as the review master) and Anon (who i totally respect as the intelligent post master) should get a room together with the best two escorts on the board and sort out their differences (and video it for Ber and Westside)
and name the video Grandad and Grandson do a Duo :lmao:
Ps. He started it :p Playground stuff I know http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-eatdrink027.gif