View Full Version : What makes someone a trusted reviewer?
Liberty Love
04-05-10, 11:08
I recieved a terrible review from a trusted reviewer... I am wonder what qualifies a member to become a trusted reviewer?
I never have liked the review system. The bad reviews make me feel terrible and the goods ones make me blush... The rats are confusing as it makes clients think that I have put them up...
I was going to opt out of the review but everyone advised that I should not opt out. What is a girl to do? I enjoy my career and I try my best to please all of my clients...
Thanks guys for ay advice
Liberty Love xxx
I recieved a terrible review from a trusted reviewer... I am wonder what qualifies a member to become a trusted reviewer?
I never have liked the review system. The bad reviews make me feel terrible and the goods ones make me blush... The rats are confusing as it makes clients think that I have put them up...
I was going to opt out of the review but everyone advised that I should not opt out. What is a girl to do? I enjoy my career and I try my best to please all of my clients...
Thanks guys for ay advice
Liberty Love xxx
Don't worry about it, with a fine healthy body like yours, I'm sure all your future reviews will be very positive.
Liberty Love
04-05-10, 11:28
Don't worry about it, with a fine healthy body like yours, I'm sure all your future reviews will be very positive.
I doubt that . It is hard to please all the people all the time..
But it still does not answer my question about what qualifies a client to become a 'trusted reviewer' ?
x
I doubt that . It is hard to please all the people all the time..
But it still does not answer my question about what qualifies a client to become a 'trusted reviewer' ?
x
I don't think anybody really knows on this site, try pm'ing a mod. All I know is, if I got hold of that fine body of yours, I'd give you a cracking review. :)
OK I dont do the Trusted Reviewer stuff, that would be more Highway mans area but as far as I know a reviewer has to go before a panel and must provide three written references from escorts that they have seen in order to be given a trusted status
Liberty Love
04-05-10, 11:45
In case any of you are interested I have posted a sneaky peek of the'box' It is gorgeous and does not smell lol... :o
I have added a rebuttal comment but it is yet to be posted...
Liberty Love
04-05-10, 11:48
So if three agency girls send in references for a client who they have seen and has given them a good review they can make that client a trusted reviewer!?
think it should entail slightly more than that... maybe a minimum of 40 reviews given or nominated and then voted on by all members male and female...
Who makes up the panel? The site admin or what ?
Im sure it does. As I said that is not my area. I am only giving you a brief idea of what it entails. Usually the guys who post here a lot will give more credence to their reviews
Here you go Liberty ;)
https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/36444-trusted-reviewer-criteria.html
Ah Anon , Is there anything you cant do
I recieved a terrible review from a trusted reviewer... I am wonder what qualifies a member to become a trusted reviewer?
I never have liked the review system. The bad reviews make me feel terrible and the goods ones make me blush... The rats are confusing as it makes clients think that I have put them up...
I was going to opt out of the review but everyone advised that I should not opt out. What is a girl to do? I enjoy my career and I try my best to please all of my clients...
Thanks guys for ay advice
Liberty Love xxx
I have just read the review and was, initially, kinda surprised, as Feargal has always come across as a decent, reliable, poster.
However, I have read another of his negative/neutral reviews and would have to disagree with some of the comments made in that one.
Your reply to his review will be noted by most people and won't affect your future business.
At the end of the day teh trusted reviewer status is only an idea for a punter, they at the end of the day make their own decisons on who to see and they too are only human. They mighnt agree with everyones tastes
I recieved a terrible review from a trusted reviewer... I am wonder what qualifies a member to become a trusted reviewer?
I never have liked the review system. The bad reviews make me feel terrible and the goods ones make me blush... The rats are confusing as it makes clients think that I have put them up...
I was going to opt out of the review but everyone advised that I should not opt out. What is a girl to do? I enjoy my career and I try my best to please all of my clients...
Thanks guys for ay advice
Liberty Love xxx
Personally I tend to ignore badges. I also read rebuttals to reviews. I take both reviews and rebuttals with a grain of salt. I'm not sure how typical that is. Maybe people who know less about the reviews system put more faith in it.
Here you go Liberty ;)
https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/36444-trusted-reviewer-criteria.html
OK I dont do the Trusted Reviewer stuff, that would be more Highway mans area but as far as I know a reviewer has to go before a panel and must provide three written references from escorts that they have seen in order to be given a trusted status
The two of you are referring to the new rules. As I understand it, there are exactly three 'trusted reviewers' who were given their badges according to those rules. The rest of us, including the person who wrote the review Liberty is referring to, were given our badges under the old system, which has never really been properly explained.
you would have to talk to the old review guru then, the exiled NBT. As far as I know in the old regiem you had to be either A friends with him or B have a certain amount of reviews or posts to qualify
MILF Hunter
04-05-10, 14:52
>>>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/22667-reviews-system-changes.html
>>>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/25287-trusted-reviewers.html
Personally I tend to ignore badges. I also read rebuttals to reviews. I take both reviews and rebuttals with a grain of salt. I'm not sure how typical that is. Maybe people who know less about the reviews system put more faith in it.
The two of you are referring to the new rules. As I understand it, there are exactly three 'trusted reviewers' who were given their badges according to those rules. The rest of us, including the person who wrote the review Liberty is referring to, were given our badges under the old system, which has never really been properly explained.
Is this similar to the old days when they gave out driving licenses because of the back log.
Can someone please explain the old system in lay mans terms and explain why some people with a trusted review badge have clearly been caught out in the past but still have their badge.
This is the reason i will never apply for the badge until the trusted reviewers can be trusted.
Liberty please come wicklow direction so i can take a closer look at your box.
you would have to talk to the old review guru then, the exiled NBT. As far as I know in the old regiem you had to be either A friends with him or B have a certain amount of reviews or posts to qualify
would it not make sence to start fresh then?i mean how can the reviewers be trusted if this site has banned the only lad that picked them?
would it not make sence to start fresh then?i mean how can the reviewers be trusted if this site has banned the only lad that picked them?
Because infairness he wasn't banned for anything to do with the reviews. For the best part he did get it right as to who he choose to become a trusted reviewer but I agree, there are at least 1 that I don't agree with..
Because infairness he wasn't banned for anything to do with the reviews. For the best part he did get it right as to who he choose to become a trusted reviewer but I agree, there are at least 1 that I don't agree with..
well to be honest i dont agree with a lot of the trusted reviewers he chose...i have no problem with nbt...but if you have to jump through 1000 hoops now it would seem silly you get the badge b4 if you were mates with him....the badge should show people the reviews they can trust...for me apart from a few its the opposite .....rant over
for me apart from a few its the opposite .....rant over
Well I have a 78.79% approval rating so you can't be taking about me :rolleyes::p Besides, in the interest of fairness, I submitted 3 references...
Well I have a 78.79% approval rating so you can't be taking about me :rolleyes::p Besides, in the interest of fairness, I submitted 3 references...
i dont know you ..and never read your reviews well if i did i forget them (sorry if you thought i meant you) but its a complete load of noncence the trusted reviewer was a good idea but its not working in practice..perhaps its time to end it?
i dont know you ..
:eek: :buttkick:of I go to put my ego back in it's bag :sad:
Hi Liberty,
Just my thoughts on this. If i choose to visit somebody with reviews, I only read the reviews of people I trust. The trusted reviewer badge does not come into it, its only certain users on here who I trust, the main one is not even a trusted reviewer (MILF). If there is a comment from the escort on a review I will always look again as I think a person who makes an effort, is, in the most part genuine. So for me, the badge is meaningless, your comments are worth everything, you are upset but I hope you realise that not all of us look at badges, we appreciate the person and comments too.
kerry lad in town
04-05-10, 21:30
well said mrfussy.
>>>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/22667-reviews-system-changes.html
>>>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/25287-trusted-reviewers.html
It is interesting in the second link that almost all who partook in that thread are now trusted.
Anyhow, getting back to the subject at hand. This thread was started by Liberty. She is suggesting that Feargal should not be a trusted reviewer because be gave her a bad review. I don’t consider his review to be TERRIBLE it is just bad. He actually made a few complimentary remarks. He didn’t click with you Liberty and you have to accept this. Maybe he could have worded his hygiene comment a bit more subtly but other than that I found the review to be fair. Having read many of his others a find his style consistent enough that I would not be out for his blood and try to take his Trusted Reviewer status.
As we are on the subject you are entitled to your rebuttal, but to include personal details about the client isn’t really necessary. After all it’s the escort that is advertising herself, her appearance and her services for financial return... not the punter.
Hi Liberty,
Just my thoughts on this. If i choose to visit somebody with reviews, I only read the reviews of people I trust. The trusted reviewer badge does not come into it, its only certain users on here who I trust, the main one is not even a trusted reviewer (MILF). If there is a comment from the escort on a review I will always look again as I think a person who makes an effort, is, in the most part genuine. So for me, the badge is meaningless, your comments are worth everything, you are upset but I hope you realise that not all of us look at badges, we appreciate the person and comments too.
i agree 100 percent well said fussy
As we are on the subject you are entitled to your rebuttal, but to include personal details about the client isn’t really necessary. After all it’s the escort that is advertising herself, her appearance and her services for financial return... not the punter.
I'm not impressed at all by this and dissapointed it was posted, personal details of the client should never be repeated, would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here :mad:
I'm not impressed at all by this and dissapointed it was posted, personal details of the client should never be repeated, would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here :mad:
Who is A.P.?
Personally I go by the overall feel of the reviews as no person can please everyone all the time.
I do pay attention to a select few regular reviewers to see what they had to say.
I also like to read the comments that the escorts leave after a review.
I think more escorts should do this even to good reviews as it shows they care.
And as a seperate note I still want to go see Liberty, I've marked it off in my calendar when she's next in Dublin, so save me a spot!
Personally I go by the overall feel of the reviews as no person can please everyone all the time.
I do pay attention to a select few regular reviewers to see what they had to say.
I also like to read the comments that the escorts leave after a review.
I think more escorts should do this even to good reviews as it shows they care.
And as a seperate note I still want to go see Liberty, I've marked it off in my calendar when she's next in Dublin, so save me a spot!
Well said...I will also be wanting to see you Liberty...please no not opt out....some punters do not choose to visit by badges...we choose to visit the person and by personality:-)
I'm not impressed at all by this and dissapointed it was posted, personal details of the client should never be repeated, would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here :mad:
To whom are you refering to Anon.
Hi,
I can't answer the question of how a reviewer gets the little badge symbol. I assumed it was something to do with the number of reviews posted. I can tell you from a client's perspective that it means relatively little to me. This is not to say that the review system is not worthwhile; it is far from perfect but it is necessary and useful for all parties. One of the worst aspects of the review system is that thoughtless and faceless individuals can attempt to damage an escort's reputation and livelihood with their callous vitriol.
Personally I consider a number of factors when browsing through the profiles on this site, including the number of reviews, the overall trend (i.e., are there more positive than negative reviews?), and only then am I interested in the content of the individual reviews themselves. This way such an outlier as a single negative review amongst twenty or more positive reviews becomes very obviously a reflection on the reviewer not the escort in question.
Again it is a purely personal thing but I would pay very little attention to a reviewer that would make such a gratuitously vulgar comment as "fergal" has done in this review. Such behaviour to me seems like the act of an ignorant, rude, inconsiderate, and ill-bred troglodyte; not somebody whose opinion would mean anything to me. In fact rather than having any negative affect on my opinion of the person being reviewed, such a vulgar review would cause me to discount any other reviews by the same reviewer.
The important thing is that you have managed to turn this into a positive for your profile: by posting a rational, clearly expressed, and professional response you have shown yourself to be a high calibre professional who takes their reputation seriously. Good for you.
Bodkin.
thehighwayman
05-05-10, 05:46
Feargals entitled to write his review as truthfully as the encounter was for him. Whether he was a trusted reviewer or not he is one of a number reviewers reviews I would trust. He is always honest. She wasn't to his liking. Not every escort that has many glowing reviews appeals to everyone. We all have different tastes. At least he's honest plenty other reviewers are afraid to tell it as it is. It's still not a bad review he's still complimentary towards her service. She just wasn't to his liking. He's entitled to his opinion. She shouldn't have put his age range on the rebuttal that's uncalled for.
thehighwayman
05-05-10, 06:09
Just because Feargals experience wasn't the same as most other reviewers doen't mean she's a bad escort. She just didn't appeal to him.
To whom are you refering to Anon.
Liberty of course and her rebuttal.. A bit paranoid JC :confused: ;)
I'm not impressed at all by this and dissapointed it was posted, personal details of the client should never be repeated, would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here :mad:
Who is A.P.?
To whom are you refering to Anon.
Liberty of course and her rebuttal.. A bit paranoid JC :confused: ;)
I don't think JAMESCORK is being paranoid. It looks very much like A.P. are the initials of Liberty's real name. They may not be, but it's a reasonable inference and you've missed two opportunities to deny it. If you have maliciously posted personal information about an escort, and implicitly threatened to reveal more, then you should be banned. If not then you need to explain you're "A.P." reference better than you have.
I don't think JAMESCORK is being paranoid. It looks very much like A.P. are the initials of Liberty's real name. They may not be, but it's a reasonable inference and you've missed two opportunities to deny it. If you have maliciously posted personal information about an escort, and implicitly threatened to reveal more, then you should be banned. If not then you need to explain you're "A.P." reference better than you have.
Ok, I can see the point but I assumed a long standing member like JC would have remembered her history, I wouldn't expect you to because it wasn't written in code or numbers or with a % sign :p Maybe you should read her reviews and you will see who A.P is.. You could start with this one:
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 007154 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/7154/LibertyLove/review.html) ;)
Ok, I can see the point but I assumed a long standing member like JC would have remembered her history, I wouldn't expect you to because it wasn't written in code or numbers or with a % sign :p Maybe you should read her reviews and you will see who A.P is.. You could start with this one:
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 007154 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/7154/LibertyLove/review.html) ;)
You have to admit that the question "would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here?" sounded like a threat, and, for those of us who do not memorise every name every escort has ever used, the initials AP could be very cryptic.
thehighwayman
05-05-10, 08:55
Liberty has just left a comment on Feargals review. She has appologised for her original comment.
You have to admit that the question "would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here?" sounded like a threat, and, for those of us who do not memorise every name every escort has ever used, the initials AP could be very cryptic.
I don't threaten escorts, if it came across as a threat I apologise, I was just inferring she wouldn't be impressed with her personal information being posted here, and no A.P is the intitials of her old profile so it is nothing personal.
I don't think JAMESCORK is being paranoid. It looks very much like A.P. are the initials of Liberty's real name. They may not be, but it's a reasonable inference and you've missed two opportunities to deny it. If you have maliciously posted personal information about an escort, and implicitly threatened to reveal more, then you should be banned. If not then you need to explain you're "A.P." reference better than you have.
Hey relax you guys. As It happens I was being paranoid. The idea of some one digging up my post history is scary. Heehee. I don't think Anon has anything to answer for although I do appreciate you trying to support liberty El
G. In any case she has left a comment so let's just leave at that.
Liberty Love
05-05-10, 09:24
Hi,
I can't answer the question of how a reviewer gets the little badge symbol. I assumed it was something to do with the number of reviews posted. I can tell you from a client's perspective that it means relatively little to me. This is not to say that the review system is not worthwhile; it is far from perfect but it is necessary and useful for all parties. One of the worst aspects of the review system is that thoughtless and faceless individuals can attempt to damage an escort's reputation and livelihood with their callous vitriol.
Personally I consider a number of factors when browsing through the profiles on this site, including the number of reviews, the overall trend (i.e., are there more positive than negative reviews?), and only then am I interested in the content of the individual reviews themselves. This way such an outlier as a single negative review amongst twenty or more positive reviews becomes very obviously a reflection on the reviewer not the escort in question.
Again it is a purely personal thing but I would pay very little attention to a reviewer that would make such a gratuitously vulgar comment as "fergal" has done in this review. Such behaviour to me seems like the act of an ignorant, rude, inconsiderate, and ill-bred troglodyte; not somebody whose opinion would mean anything to me. In fact rather than having any negative affect on my opinion of the person being reviewed, such a vulgar review would cause me to discount any other reviews by the same reviewer.
The important thing is that you have managed to turn this into a positive for your profile: by posting a rational, clearly expressed, and professional response you have shown yourself to be a high calibre professional who takes their reputation seriously. Good for you.
Bodkin.
I have read all comments and would like to thank everyone for there imput. But mostly it was the above quote that made me regret what I had wrote. You see my comment was not rational nor clearly expressed. One could hardly say it was a professional response. I wrote the comment with a hot head and I deeply regret insulting Feargal . I hope that he and other except my apology and we can all move on...
I have read all comments and would like to thank everyone for there imput. But mostly it was the above quote that made me regret what I had wrote. You see my comment was not rational nor clearly expressed. One could hardly say it was a professional response. I wrote the comment with a hot head and I deeply regret insulting Feargal . I hope that he and other except my apology and we can all move on...
Now that's a professional response and it took guts to post. You have my respect Liberty. Well done girl and continue to do what you obviously do well.
James.
I don't threaten escorts, if it came across as a threat I apologise, I was just inferring she wouldn't be impressed with her personal information being posted here, and no A.P is the intitials of her old profile so it is nothing personal.
Thanks for clarifying that. In case you were wondering, or anyone else was, I wasn't trying to get you banned.
Thanks for clarifying that. In case you were wondering, or anyone else was, I wasn't trying to get you banned.
HA HA El Gordo, No chance. Anon would have to do something extremly out of charecter for us to even consider banning him
[QUOTE=mr maxi;213325]Is this similar to the old days when they gave out driving licenses because of the back log.
Can someone please explain the old system in lay mans terms and explain why some people with a trusted review badge have clearly been caught out in the past but still have their badge.
Can someone please explain the above request.
[QUOTE=mr maxi;213325]Is this similar to the old days when they gave out driving licenses because of the back log.
Can someone please explain the old system in lay mans terms and explain why some people with a trusted review badge have clearly been caught out in the past but still have their badge.
Can someone please explain the above request.
It's all a bit of a farce really. How can you trust a man who may be cheating on his wife or girlfriend. We are all probably good liars, just looking out for ourselves and our mickeys. It's a business that invokes dishonesty. I'd like to think I try to tell the truth, but I'm smoking behind my spouses back, punting behind her back and the list goes on, how can you possibly trust me, I speak for myself of course, but I'm sure there are one or two others. Having said that, I do tell the truth in my few reviews and I'll never put a girl down, even if I have to tell a teeny weeny fib. Life is wonderful, get the brasso out and shine your shields. ;)
[QUOTE=mr maxi;213678]
It's all a bit of a farce really. How can you trust a man who may be cheating on his wife or girlfriend. We are all probably good liars, just looking out for ourselves and our mickeys. It's a business that invokes dishonesty. I'd like to think I try to tell the truth, but I'm smoking behind my spouses back, punting behind her back and the list goes on, how can you possibly trust me, I speak for myself of course, but I'm sure there are one or two others. Having said that, I do tell the truth in my few reviews and I'll never put a girl down, even if I have to tell a teeny weeny fib. Life is wonderful, get the brasso out and shine your shields. ;)
It's not really a case whether you are trusted by your wife or not ya bad boy ya - it's whether your experiences with escorts are truly reported back to the rest of us cheating bastards. It's kinda like honour amongst thieves. But I wish you wouldn't tell those little fibs rover cos it might put me wrong and cause me to waste time and money.
So take out your brasso lad and polish yours - and try to live up to it. Heehee.
MILF Hunter
06-05-10, 18:23
How can you trust a man who may be cheating on his wife or girlfriend.
I have neither ... that oughta make me a trusted person on EI dont you think? (and a loser in the real life of course)
he he :p
I don't know what makes a trusted reviewer but you should stay in the review system - I have been a member for 5/6 months and I visit an escort at least once every two weeks. I make a choice from reading the reviews but it's not great reviews I am looking for it's a balance. If you get a bad review I can imagine how that makes you feel but in the absence of reviews how can a punter select an escort?