View Full Version : Another Classic review
I don't think his translator program is very good
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 022652 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/bella13-italian-female-escort.html)
Jonnyboy1882
13-04-10, 20:53
Brilliant!
Dirty Harry
13-04-10, 20:58
I don't think his translator program is very good
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 022652 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/bella13-italian-female-escort.html)no unfortunately not :confused:
Now that's just brilliant! I never stop being amazed about what kind of reviews make it through.
BootSlick55
13-04-10, 23:05
Suspiciously similar to the garbled syntax of the escort he's reviewing. Just a coincidence, of course.
willshedoit
13-04-10, 23:10
I don't think his translator program is very good
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 022652 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/bella13-italian-female-escort.html)
He hope to become trusted reviewer soon
Whats wrong with it. 80 quid and the he turned into a she. even got a beer too. Adopted by him in a beautiful flat, poetry in motion.
If only I could write like that
http://www.elm.esu3.org/jrsrhigh/Speech_OneAct/Images/Romeo%20Monkey.png
roger_rabbit
14-04-10, 00:34
that girls stats are incredible, a cupsize of 50C :yikes:
Quarterpoundher
14-04-10, 19:52
Now that's just brilliant! I never stop being amazed about what kind of reviews make it through.
We do not base any reviews validity "only" on its grammar and syntax. We can all infer its worth as we see fit but we cannot disallow it just on those criteria alone.
There may not be as many non nationals here as there was a few years ago but they have not all upped sticks and left either as you yourself are living proof of that (subject to finding a spiderless state in the US).
You have great English, others may not and as I say we cannot stop a review being activated just because the writer has bad English. So you can drop the insinuation that we are incapable of spotting such things as we do and are being fair and in the absence of any other info we have no choice but to activate.
We do not base any reviews validity "only" on its grammar and syntax. We can all infer its worth as we see fit but we cannot disallow it just on those criteria alone.
There may not be as many non nationals here as there was a few years ago but they have not all upped sticks and left either as you yourself are living proof of that (subject to finding a spiderless state in the US).
You have great English, others may not and as I say we cannot stop a review being activated just because the writer has bad English. So you can drop the insinuation that we are incapable of spotting such things as we do and are being fair and in the absence of any other info we have no choice but to activate.
Le pardon, I meant to say "..what kind of reviews make it throught without a rat."
It's up to you to know the rules which apply in such situation but I think we both know what action should've been taken here... and it wasn't.
But thanks for your kind explanation here. It certanly makes a better impression than to see the ones in charge having just a good laugh about a matter which is essentiall for escorts business.
Quarterpoundher
14-04-10, 20:27
Le pardon, I meant to say "..what kind of reviews make it throught without a rat."
It's up to you to know the rules which apply in such situation but I think we both know what action should've been taken here... and it wasn't.
But thanks for your kind explanation here. It certanly makes a better impression than to see the ones in charge having just a good laugh about a matter which is essentiall for escorts business.
Why would we or should we rat it just on the grammar? Surely that in itself is just as bad for all the Escorts who have a review with bad English. I have lost count of how many I would have ratted if that was the policy.
I would hazzard a guess but if we did that then probably every Escort here would have a rat or two just on grammar alone. If I was overseas and a punter and wrote a review on E-Tadzikistan I dare say their forum would be pissing themselves rightabout now at my review.
I have my own opinion same as ye when seeing a review like that but when validating them I have to leave that at the door and judge it on its own and bad grammar is not against review rules.
Welcome back Anna................
Why would we or should we rat it just on the grammar? Surely that in itself is just as bad for all the Escorts who have a review with bad English. I have lost count of how many I would have ratted if that was the policy.
I would hazzard a guess but if we did that then probably every Escort here would have a rat or two just on grammar alone. If I was overseas and a punter and wrote a review on E-Tadzikistan I dare say their forum would be pissing themselves rightabout now at my review.
I have my own opinion same as ye when seeing a review like that but when validating them I have to leave that at the door and judge it on its own and bad grammar is not against review rules.
My god man...this is defintly a fake review! Why don't you just admit a mistake was made and rat it? You would be respected better for it.
WhenLoveComesToTown
14-04-10, 21:28
I don't think his translator program is very good
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 022652 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/bella13-italian-female-escort.html)
I like ... he speak good england ....
http://foodnmore.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/borat.jpg
Quarterpoundher
14-04-10, 21:39
My god man...this is defintly a fake review! Why don't you just admit a mistake was made and rat it? You would be respected better for it.
Ok then will I also rat half the reviews here while I am at it?
How many grammatical errors warrents a rat?
Are the lingustically challenged not allowed to book a ride and review said ride?
Why would we or should we rat it just on the grammar? Surely that in itself is just as bad for all the Escorts who have a review with bad English. I have lost count of how many I would have ratted if that was the policy.
I would hazzard a guess but if we did that then probably every Escort here would have a rat or two just on grammar alone. If I was overseas and a punter and wrote a review on E-Tadzikistan I dare say their forum would be pissing themselves rightabout now at my review.
I have my own opinion same as ye when seeing a review like that but when validating them I have to leave that at the door and judge it on its own and bad grammar is not against review rules.
Maybe a quick glance into the reviews FAQ would be useful：
"We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible ..."
The fact that you claiming that you don't rat reviews without overwhelming evidence is disputable as far as my reviews are concerned i.e XPS it was never given any reason why the reviews are ratted. It only became convenient to rat them so I wont win escort of the month.
If you think a little about other circumstances of the review being written, you will surely see that bad grammar isnt the only issue.
Certainly to the posting of such a desperate review must have preceded a desperate situation, in which the said escort certainly was - considering she was paying for extra exposure on a special banner for a long time yet the only true review she got was a bad one, the business didn't go well for her.
Makes it look like you treating her reviews better because she brings extra money to the EI pocket... Unlike me who just bitches about escorts being treated unfairly...
Ok then will I also rat half the reviews here while I am at it?
How many grammatical errors warrents a rat?
Are the lingustically challenged not allowed to book a ride and review said ride?
This is beyond bad grammar. It actually doesn't make any sense at all.
I believe your just being stubborn.
If you care to translate it for me and everyone else then you don't have to rat it... Deal??
Ok then will I also rat half the reviews here while I am at it?
How many grammatical errors warrents a rat?
Are the lingustically challenged not allowed to book a ride and review said ride?
No, they arent : https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/general-chat/21897-could-anyone-tell-me-why.html
....well, at least not when they review me...
Anna23 is owning this thread!!
Quarterpoundher
14-04-10, 22:48
She's welcome to it. I never heard anything as silly as saying a review should be ratted "just" on grammar...
Do ye think all non nationals here are working (or were working) as professors of medicine?
I worked with plenty of non Irish with no English at all and I worked with Irish fellas who could barely write.
Where the 'debest' other post which appeared after the one above????just disappeared...hmmmm
This is beyond bad grammar. It actually doesn't make any sense at all.
I believe your just being stubborn.
If you care to translate it for me and everyone else then you don't have to rat it... Deal??
You mean this one...................:rolleyes:
Where the 'debest' other post which appeared after the one above????just disappeared...hmmmm
On the previous page.................Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.........................:rolleyes:
Holy shit was looking at different thread....lol
She's welcome to it. I never heard anything as silly as saying a review should be ratted "just" on grammar...
Do ye think all non nationals here are working (or were working) as professors of medicine?
I worked with plenty of non Irish with no English at all and I worked with Irish fellas who could barely write.
Yes...I believe someone who can't write a coherent sentance shouldn't be allowed to write a review.
Why the hell would someone with such poor english try to write a review (unles it's for themselves)??
Anna has already made a fool of you so I'm going to leave it at that.
You're an extremely stubborn man obviously (which I admire kind of). You're the one in charge so do as you choose but at least admit it look suspicious., even a little!
You mean this one...................:rolleyes:
On the previous page.................Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.........................:rolleyes:
Haha! I thought I was apart of some conspiracy. Oh well...thanks for your concern apollo.
Haha! I thought I was apart of some conspiracy. Oh well...thanks for your concern apollo.
Ya, you obviously wern't the only one that thought it was part of some conspiracy......................:rolleyes:
I'm sure, not that he was accusing a mod of deleting a post with the "hmmmmm..................." part at all.....................:rolleyes:
Ya, you obviously wern't the only one that thought it was part of some conspiracy......................:rolleyes:
I'm sure, not that he was accusing a mod of deleting a post with the "hmmmmm..................." part at all.....................:rolleyes:
You pesky mods will never get me!!
Of course i was...wasnt it obvious enough:rolleyes:...
stickytoffee10
14-04-10, 23:23
sorry whats he saying? tried my best but he's nuts. (back to school)
You pesky mods will never get me!!
Congratulations.................you just made the list.............................:D:D:D
http://www.utvet.com/images/Gale/chimpGangster-.jpg
Of course i was...wasnt it obvious enough:rolleyes:...
Keep sticking it to the man my friend...
Of course i was...wasnt it obvious enough:rolleyes:...
Well pull your head out if your ass before you do it again, you're making yourself look silly.............
Unless you want to make the list too???.......................:D
Now please, I'm very busy.............
http://www.apecity.com/video/cb_chimps1.jpg
Congratulations.................you just made the list.............................:D:D:D
http://www.utvet.com/images/Gale/chimpGangster-.jpg
Christ...is that you?? How about we work somethiing out?? I'll take out apollo for you. Come on...I'm begging you!!
Christ...is that you?? How about we work somethiing out?? I'll take out apollo for you. Come on...I'm begging you!!
You should see me without the make up..................:eek:
You should see me without the make up..................:eek:
The pistol looks nice though...
The pistol looks nice though...
I didn't think you could see it in that photo.........................:o
Oh...........you mean the gun.................:D
I didn't think you could see it in that photo.........................:o
Oh...........you mean the gun.................:D
Hey...I don't like what your trying to imply. Not that there's anything wrong it now.
Oh well...it's been fun Luther but I'm off to bed.
Much love (platonic of course )
Jaysus Luther ... how many chimp pics have you collected by now... haha..
Jaysus Luther ... how many chimp pics have you collected by now... haha..
I've been dipping into the family photo collection............:D
haha .. you have a very extensive yet attractive family. You must be sooo proud.
Ya, except my brother, he's allways a bit high.........:D
http://bitsandpieces.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/imageshippy-20chimp.jpg
I never heard anything as silly as saying a review should be ratted "just" on grammar...
Do ye think all non nationals here are working (or were working) as professors of medicine?
I worked with plenty of non Irish with no English at all and I worked with Irish fellas who could barely write.
I never suggested such nonsense, so back off QPH and read my posts.
I've merely stated the facts and that is my last word. Reader make your own opinion. And QPH stop with this denial, learn the rules and do your job better.
BTW have you visited the non advertising advertisers section lately? Lots of work to do over there, which even by using "The report a post button" wasn't done. Maybe while you are at it, you should learn the rules for ad section as well...
No matter how I enjoyed this little row, I'm not getting into an argument. See unlike others I'm a working person who does her job properly so no time for this.
Bye now. x
Quarterpoundher
15-04-10, 10:59
I never suggested such nonsense, so back off QPH and read my posts.
I've merely stated the facts and that is my last word. Reader make your own opinion. And QPH stop with this denial, learn the rules and do your job better.
BTW have you visited the non advertising advertisers section lately? Lots of work to do over there, which even by using "The report a post button" wasn't done. Maybe while you are at it, you should learn the rules for ad section as well...
No matter how I enjoyed this little row, I'm not getting into an argument. See unlike others I'm a working person who does her job properly so no time for this.
Bye now. x
The day I see your or anyone here's name on my paypacket is the day I ask how high when you say jump
How dare you be so presumpious as to tell me what to do about anything. I will mod whatever I feel like modding whenever I feel like it.
I am actually in the process of having this issue revisted as another review that is comparable in it syntax has just been told to mods by E-I that it originates from a East Euro location and I am asking if this reviewer thats being discussed here also comes from same place. If that is the case then we will have IP grounds for deletion and not just because some think it should be deleted on grammar alone.
I can only work with what I am presented with. I cannot see the country of origin which is why I am now asking E-I to do so, we cannot ask them to do that for every single review....
thehighwayman
15-04-10, 11:14
I never suggested such nonsense, so back off QPH and read my posts.
I've merely stated the facts and that is my last word. Reader make your own opinion. And QPH stop with this denial, learn the rules and do your job better.
BTW have you visited the non advertising advertisers section lately? Lots of work to do over there, which even by using "The report a post button" wasn't done. Maybe while you are at it, you should learn the rules for ad section as well...
No matter how I enjoyed this little row, I'm not getting into an argument. See unlike others I'm a working person who does her job properly so no time for this.
Bye now. x
This isn't QPHs or any other mods job. We don't work for ei we're just helpers. We are not obligated to mod every forum. Mods are just backup to ei when needed. People seem to forget that we have jobs and lives outside of ei.
Well now u wouldnt have to be a genius to figure out that review is suspect, its written in the very same
style as the intro on her profile and to rat a review just says that its THOUGHT to be fake not that it definitely
is. If u put together all the evidence there is morer than a strong possibility that this review is fake.
Also there is a previous review from a reviewer with over 40 reviews saying that it is not the girl in the
photos,eventhough she still has verefied pics and that favs were not avaliable and overall service was
terrible
Quarterpoundher
15-04-10, 11:21
We are trying to get better evidence and we have a second comparable review so have a baseline to work from and compare. We do not react to the will of the crowd, we work on fact and as a team. Sarah has said she is looking into this new data within seconds of my asking.
This isn't QPHs or any other mods job. We don't work for ei we're just helpers. We are not obligated to mod every forum. Mods are just backup to ei when needed. People seem to forget that we have jobs and lives outside of ei.
So why does it say "forum& reviews moderator" under your user name?
Dont forget that people know that you are payed for modding even if its just a "little", this makes it your job too.
This isn't QPHs or any other mods job. We don't work for ei we're just helpers. We are not obligated to mod every forum. Mods are just backup to ei when needed. People seem to forget that we have jobs and lives outside of ei.
Well this poses a real problem because what seems to be happening is totally hit and miss and everything is modded today and then tomorrow
maybe noone looks at stuff and it falls through the cracks. It seems to me that someone in IE should delegate the work in accordance with
what the people are prepared to do. I would imagine that the amount to do is pretty constant so i cant see how u can run something properly
if u dont know who is going to be avalioable to do what. Its like having a buisness and u have 10 employees and u dont know each morning
how many will turn up for work,well u cant plan what or how much u will get done . So its same here if a set amount isnt planned ahead how
can things be kept on top of and up to date. Im not saying how little or how much a mod should do thats for themselves to decide but i do feel
if u dont have some kind of rota or plan alot of stuff will be overlooked and also u prob will have alot double checked also wasting resources
Quarterpoundher
15-04-10, 11:31
So why does it say "forum& reviews moderator" under your user name?
Dont forget that people know that you are payed for modding even if its just a "little", this makes it your job too.
Oh FFS!!!! 60 euro a week, Not even a tenner a day for this shite!!!! are you insane to suggest that this is a job and therefore we put in 40 hour week for 60 euro
Would you drop your drawers for a a tenner a day in your job.?
Anna come back to me when you have landed back on planet Earth.
Well, my living expenses are actually e40 a week if I dont count my bloody expensive rent of course.
Now 60e a week is much more than what I got payed in my very first job for instance.
So yea, for me 60e a week presents good money.
Not to mention that some are willing to have a cheesy cock down their throat and mouth filled with cum of a stranger who hopefully is not infected with anything for this kind of money.
If you cannot appreciate your income then its no wonder that your doing a louzy job.
thehighwayman
15-04-10, 11:39
Theres a few of us that do reviews and theres a few others that don't do reviews and mod the forums. We're not going around like headless chickens going over the same things. We do communicate and discuss things amongst us. If one of us aren't going to be around for a day or two we let the rest know. Nothing gets overlooked as far as I can see. When you get some messer posting rubbish it's usually deleted within minutes or someone comes to us about something we deal with it promptly. Even during easter and weekends all the reviews were done. Theres always a few of us around.
thehighwayman
15-04-10, 11:44
So why does it say "forum& reviews moderator" under your user name?
Dont forget that people know that you are payed for modding even if its just a "little", this makes it your job too.
There are a few moderators that don't take any money for doing this. I'm not saying who does or who doesn't. It's none of your business :D:p
Theres a few of us that do reviews and theres a few others that don't do reviews and mod the forums. We're not going around like headless chickens going over the same things. We do communicate and discuss things amongst us. If one of us aren't going to be around for a day or two we let the rest know. Nothing gets overlooked as far as I can see. When you get some messer posting rubbish it's usually deleted within minutes or someone comes to us about something we deal with it promptly. Even during easter and weekends all the reviews were done. Theres always a few of us around.
I see and appreciate the good work you guys do but still cannot understand why there are sections for which this doesnt apply ( i.e non advertisers adverts )
I'll repeat what was called for many times before - consistency and transparency is needed.
Quarterpoundher
15-04-10, 12:07
Well, my living expenses are actually e40 a week if I dont count my bloody expensive rent of course.
Now 60e a week is much more than what I got payed in my very first job for instance.
So yea, for me 60e a week presents good money.
Not to mention that some are willing to have a cheesy cock down their throat and mouth filled with cum of a stranger who hopefully is not infected with anything for this kind of money.
If you cannot appreciate your income then its no wonder that your doing a louzy job.
I will take that post as tounge in cheek as you cannot possibly be serious but just say you are...
You got 60 for first job as a teenager but you expect me a grown adult to sit here for 40 hours and survive in this day and age on 60 euro a week? So I am supposed to drop my real job which incidentally I spend 3 times that ammount of feed for my Horses so what do I say to the two thirds of them that I could not feed if I took Anna Hobbs school of loony tune economics ?
Or what would I eat myself?
God you really do expect a lot for 60. Ok then Anna, put your money where your mouth is, put up an ad here saying you can be booked for 40 hours for 60 euro and then I might consider starving my horses just so I can be on standby for a thankless individual like you.
Then and only then will I take you seriously on this..
I want to be a mod. Are you listening, Patricia?
I'll take €50 a week, be twice as pompous, ban every fucker that posts a swear word, and award myself more medals than a school sports day.
Best online CV you'll get this year!! :D
Someone has to be responsible for reviews. We can't have people saying they'll do it if they feel like it or have time. This is a core component of the site. If running the thing an amateur basis, or semi-pro in some cases, isn't working then Pat will simply need to hire someone.
thehighwayman
15-04-10, 19:14
This isn't semi pro or amateur what we do. We put in an awful lot of time and effort into reviews. I can't see how one full time person could do any better. Theres no need for Patricia to hire anyone to do the reviews as we are doing it comfortably. Since we started doing it at the start of the year I've been activating reviews almost everyday. Apart from a couple of days here and there that I wasn't here. But those couple of days I took off still means that I've been on here at least 6 days every week at various times through the day. On those days I haven't been here othe rmods have been doing them. Some weeks including easter I've been here for the whole week. The reviews are my priority now when I go on to this site. Unless I get a pm from someone or an urgent reported post I deal with the reviews. Not only do I deal with reviews alot but QPH puts in an alot of time and effort as can be seen by this https://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/warning-section/37743-edy03-3-laois-lass-s.html West and doozer also help out. In the event that none of us are here which is very rare Ad Staff or Sarah would step in and do the reviews. I have been modding since last June and apart from Christmas week theres always been a few mods online everyday.
Quarterpoundher
15-04-10, 19:40
Someone has to be responsible for reviews. We can't have people saying they'll do it if they feel like it or have time. This is a core component of the site. If running the thing an amateur basis, or semi-pro in some cases, isn't working then Pat will simply need to hire someone.
There is she is called Sarah... We put reviews on hold for her attention when required and we deal with the rest ourselves when we feel like doing them. She works here and we don't. She has the final say on anything to do with reviews and she wont hear a peep out of me whatever she decides.
jimbobbins
15-04-10, 21:21
Well now u wouldnt have to be a genius to figure out that review is suspect, its written in the very same
style as the intro on her profile and to rat a review just says that its THOUGHT to be fake not that it definitely
is. If u put together all the evidence there is morer than a strong possibility that this review is fake.
Also there is a previous review from a reviewer with over 40 reviews saying that it is not the girl in the
photos,eventhough she still has verefied pics and that favs were not avaliable and overall service was
terrible
I agree with ber and Anna. I wish a bit of common sense could be used in relation to the reviews. This review manages to be obviously phony and completely incomprehensible at the same time which is some feat. QPH it was yourself that brought up the subject of "grammar". Do a quick search on the thread. The word has hardly been used by any other poster but you've repeatedly used it. Anna said clearly why she felt it should be ratted and still you've accused her of wanting the review ratted "just" because of the grammar.:confused:
Jimbob