View Full Version : Ratted Reviews and reviews which should never be
I've read the review below, fair play to QPH for his comments and eveything but surely the review should just be discarded. It comes up as a ratted review but it is obviously not valid from a guy pissed and high. Vanessa deserves a medal for the way she handled things. A rat against her profile can be perceived as negative...and in this case unwarranted. I think such reviews should just be discarded, only my opinion....
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 021580 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/vanessa42-spanish-female-escort.html)
I feel that that review should be deleted full stop . No escort should have to see any client off his head like Bigsby was , it must be scary enough for the girl to meet sober clients let alone druggies . If she had went ahead with the appointment and somehow satisfied him , she'd be in a far worse position . Imagine the review , and the image in peoples mind that here's an escort that doesn't give a toss and sees guys no matter what condition they may be in .
The fact that people are able to read it, and comment here on how well she handled the situation here, in my mind is a reason not to delete it.........
Although it shows on her list of review as ratted, I think it shows her in a very posotive light and a reflection of her level of professionalism and honesty..........
adogwithabone
17-03-10, 22:29
I've read the review below, fair play to QPH for his comments and eveything but surely the review should just be discarded. It comes up as a ratted review but it is obviously not valid from a guy pissed and high. Vanessa deserves a medal for the way she handled things. A rat against her profile can be perceived as negative...and in this case unwarranted. I think such reviews should just be discarded, only my opinion....
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 021580 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/vanessa42-spanish-female-escort.html)
I think that something like this should be put to a vote. Let the members here view it and decide whether it should be ratted or discarded altogether. I know what I would do but if there is a vote then no one can gripe about it.
It shows on her list as a negative review. It should be deleted. Or at least changed to N/A.
But why did the mod give us so much of his opinion. Surely that is way out of order for a Mod to comment one way or the other.
The fact that people are able to read it, and comment here on how well she handled the situation here, in my mind is a reason not to delete it.........
Although it shows on her list of review as ratted, I think it shows her in a very posotive light and a reflection of her level of professionalism and honesty..........
I have just logged on and have found this post. Jaysus someone is out to get this girl. I visited her only yesterday and have reviewed her. I’m not going to reiterate what I have said in my review its there for all to see. I can genuinely state that this girl is kosher and totally adorable. Is she involved with a pissed off pimp – I don’t know. All I can say is she is young and somewhat inexperienced. She struck me as being too intelligent to take a punt at 4am tho.
To rat this is doing a disservice to this lovely girl. She has already had a few lets say not so positive reviews on her profile. This review should DEFINITELY be deleted. I am supposed to be a trusted reviewer. I met this girl yesterday. Trust me!!!!!
Surely that is way out of order for a Mod to comment one way or the other.
That's a bit strong I think...........
What do you think should be done???
Just rat it stick it up there like we don't give a shit???
Because if that's what was done then that's what we would be accused of, not giving a shit........
Furthermore I did receive OWO. Surely its up to her to decide...
I have just logged on and have found this post. Jaysus someone is out to get this girl. I visited her only yesterday and have reviewed her. I’m not going to reiterate what I have said in my review its there for all to see. I can genuinely state that this girl is kosher and totally adorable. Is she involved with a pissed off pimp – I don’t know. All I can say is she is young and somewhat inexperienced. She struck me as being too intelligent to take a punt at 4am tho.
To rat this is doing a disservice to this lovely girl. She has already had a few lets say not so positive reviews on her profile. This review should DEFINITELY be deleted. I am supposed to be a trusted reviewer. I met this girl yesterday. Trust me!!!!!
All I can say is fuck fuck fuck, I looked at her profile, was very interested in seeing her but for some stupid reason I decided to take a risk and see another girl which turned out to be a mediocre experience so once again FUCK!!!
When people are looking at a girls profile and they click to see her reviews and they see a ratted review, or a few ratted reviews, sadly I think, most people then firstly call into question the escort, and look at it with suspicion from her side, or at least that's the way I feel people view then initially.........
Ratted reviews are just as much if not more, showing that we are suspicious at the reviewer, not the escort......
In a case like this, it's a rat on a negative review so straight away it rings alarm bells for me about the reviewer, not the escort.........
That's a bit strong I think...........
What do you think should be done???
Just rat it stick it up there like we don't give a shit???
Because if that's what was done then that's what we would be accused of, not giving a shit........
Just give the reason for the Rat. *** Shares IP address ** or what ever
But there should be no reason to make the mods personal opinion of the event know.
When people are looking at a girls profile and they click to see her reviews and they see a ratted review, or a few ratted reviews, sadly I think, most people then firstly call into question the escort, and look at it with suspicion from her side, or at least that's the way I feel people view then initially.........
Ratted reviews are just as much if not more, showing that we are suspicious at the reviewer, not the escort......
In a case like this, it's a rat on a negative review so straight away it rings alarm bells for me about the reviewer, not the escort.........
That’s grand for you to say Luther, you are very experienced in this field, but take it form Joe soaps point of view - a quick glance sees three dodgy reviews, a few good ones and one ratted. Even Anon has said he was put off. Surely a rat is a deterrent.
Luther, you have hit the nail on the head because sadly in a lot of cases a review is ratted because Mods don't believe the reviewer is a genuine client and it was written by the escort or somebody else that will gain from her positive review. That of course is going to imprint itself onto clients minds. Surely some other mark is needed to distinguish between Fake reviews written by an escorts gooneys and a fake review written to harm an escorts business?
I do think a review like this one shouldn't make it onto the site, especially when he openly admits to drug use, I bet that has already been filled away by some reporter to use in a rubbish article at a later date, it wouldn't be wrong and I don't think anyone would disagree with the censorship of this type of review.
Just give the reason for the Rat. *** Shares IP address ** or what ever
But there should be no reason to make the mods personal opinion of the event know.
As I wasn't the one who left the comment on the review, but in my opinion, he's explaining a little about it so that other have all the information about this reviewer, other reviews submitted, date joined etc..........
In fairness, I think he's just trying to be as helpfull as possible to all.........
I think "way out of line" is a little bit strong in describing it...........
As I say, I didn't write it so I won't comment on it any further...............
Luther, you have hit the nail on the head because sadly in a lot of cases a review is ratted because Mods don't believe the reviewer is a genuine client and it was written by the escort or somebody else that will gain from her positive review. That of course is going to imprint itself onto clients minds. Surely some other mark is needed to distinguish between Fake reviews written by an escorts gooneys and a fake review written to harm an escorts business?
And yes, I have been thinking about something like this, but I think it's frought with difficulties..........
As a general rule of thumb..........
A rat on a positive review will draw suspicion on the escort, a rat on a negative review will draw suspicion on the reviewer. That's why, if this review is left, I believe it should stay as a negative review, and not changed to N/A...........
That’s grand for you to say Luther, you are very experienced in this field, but take it form Joe soaps point of view - a quick glance sees three dodgy reviews, a few good ones and one ratted. Even Anon has said he was put off. Surely a rat is a deterrent.
When we try to explain things on a review such as this to help people to understand we're seen to be "way out of line"............
It's hard to win sometimes.............
But I think a review such as this highlights the difficulties that escorts face, probably every day.........
Is it best to just delete it and sweep it under the carpet???
I think people need to read ratted reviews properly and to make up their own minds on them and not to just dismiss them, or the escort when they see them..........
When we try to explain things on a review such as this to help people to understand we're seen to be "way out of line"............
It's hard to win sometimes.............
But I think a review such as this highlights the difficulties that escorts face, probably every day.........
Is it best to just delete it and sweep it under the carpet???
I think people need to read ratted reviews properly and to make up their own minds on them and not to just dismiss them, or the escort when they see them..........
The purpose of reviews is to give potential punters a chance to decide if this Escort is good or bad. A review from a drunken, doped out of his mind yobo serves no purpose but to damage an escort’s profile. Why should such a review, acknowledged by you mods as inappropriate, be even posted? I’m sorry now Luther, and I’m not singling you out, but I feel very strongly about this and if necessarily will start a thread highlighting this issue. I have no affiliation with this girl other than having a lovely experience with her yesterday but I strongly suggest that this review be deleted. Please look into this even if only as a mater of customer service.
adogwithabone
18-03-10, 01:29
I say again. The reviews are here for the benefit of both clients and escorts, effectively everyone who posts here. Let us decide what should happen to the review by voting on it. That way, no one is imposing anything on anyone and no one can complain.
This one is a tough call, but I can certainly see reasons for leaving it. When I evaluate reviews I often look at a reviewer's previous reviews. Suppose this guy writes another review, which isn't such obvious junk. I want to be able to see this one so I know that this is someone whose opinion I don't trust. On the other hand, it would unfair if it harms Vanessa. But will it? I wouldn't pay any attention to a ratted negative review from someone with no other reviews. And I always read negative reviews before deciding what to think about them. But perhaps I'm not a typical punter.
Regarding the length of the note, I'm just happy that the mods have started giving reasons and signing them.
It seems to me that the rat should be assigned to the reviewer and not the girl in question?
The rat is assigned to the review, not the escort or the reviewer. The rat symbol appears in the list for both the escort and the reviewer. In this case it's fairly important that it appears in the escort's list, because a negative review without the rat would look a genuine negative review.
Quarterpoundher
18-03-10, 20:13
I've read the review below, fair play to QPH for his comments and eveything but surely the review should just be discarded. It comes up as a ratted review but it is obviously not valid from a guy pissed and high. Vanessa deserves a medal for the way she handled things. A rat against her profile can be perceived as negative...and in this case unwarranted. I think such reviews should just be discarded, only my opinion....
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 021580 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/vanessa42-spanish-female-escort.html)
As I understand it E-I very very rarely delete reviews and I only help out and wish to not become anymore then a helper in reviews so would leave a decision to delete to Sarah to decide on. I only delete reviews that are duplicates submitted on same day which happens sometimes or 2nd or 3rd reviews or reviews that break rules. This one does not as I see it break the rules as such and so it comes under a judgment call for those higher up the reviews chain then I wish to be to make a call on deletion. So all I can do is collate the various info when I find something that merits pointing out and place a note. I would say that reading that review most people would come away with a positive view of her and her honesty in dealing with a difficult situation.
I would point out the people should not automatically equate a rat with the Escort having done anything wrong, in this case its clear when people read it that she was very honest and did not take advantage of his being 4 sheets to the wind and shows she is an honest person.
Quarterpoundher
18-03-10, 23:07
As I wasn't the one who left the comment on the review, but in my opinion, he's explaining a little about it so that other have all the information about this reviewer, other reviews submitted, date joined etc..........
In fairness, I think he's just trying to be as helpfull as possible to all.........
I think "way out of line" is a little bit strong in describing it...........
As I say, I didn't write it so I won't comment on it any further...............
Exactly, all I do is piece together what anyone submits in review and options choosen and join date/first review etc and tally that with anything other reviews have said that contradict his statements. If something.... "anything" does not smell right I will point it out without fear nor favor to either party. Its for people to decide to take note of it or not. Someone said to post IP links and I do that when I see it and state who they link to. I will be doing exactly that soon for two people well known here who according to IP data they have posted reviews for same escort with two profiles.
One has two trusted reviewer badges and the other none but well know here and I say also this does not mean they are the same person but i will post links on the relevant reviews again with a view to people having the option to rule in or rule out the IP link as relevant or not.
People have been calling for a tightening up reviews and that is exactly what I intend to contribute to and all my efforts are with a view to stating facts and some will not like the facts that will be posted but they are facts none the less.
silver2009
18-03-10, 23:35
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 021629 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/chloe9-slovak-female-escort.html)
here is first time review today that looks fake. Not written by a native English speaker and quick off the mark with the review. Could be wrong but one of those reviews that doesnt have any credibility imo
"I met Chloe yestreday and i was really surprised. The comunication was fast and she was really kind in answering the phone. She looks better then in the pics (very bad photograf she chose) and she likes all her favourites. I hope to see her again. Really lovely girl, not proffesional, more GFE, but this i really like...Not time watcher and not pressing me...for me it was really good meeting"