View Full Version : Why has this review been allowed??
EnglishTaylor
09-02-10, 14:35
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 020246 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/english-taylor-british-female-escort.html)
I have just messaged you sarah about this review, i beleive it to be fake & not just because its a negative review. He says he cant remember exact date & time. As in the rule listed in 'reviews FAQs' below:
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
So why has it been posted?? I have also added my comment back to this review & anyone interested in having a laugh Please read with a cuppa!! xxx
After having the time of my life with this girl awile back and read the review she is talking about . i think the problem is with you Mr Serious. I found tayler attitude to be one to you at your easy and very helpful , as for the Service Provided OMG is all i will say. I think the hole review thing is going to have to be looked at if fack revews which are just posted to misslead punters and this cradit some escorts
capt.pugwash
09-02-10, 18:21
After having the time of my life with this girl awile back and read the review she is talking about . i think the problem is with you Mr Serious. I found tayler attitude to be one to you at your easy and very helpful , as for the Service Provided OMG is all i will say. I think the hole review thing is going to have to be looked at if fack revews which are just posted to misslead punters and this cradit some escorts
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Yaaarrrr , Quote = " THE HOLE REVIEW " :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
No point in beating around the bush there !!!
Please, -- The name Vagina sounds more apt.
EnglishTaylor
09-02-10, 21:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Yaaarrrr , Quote = " THE HOLE REVIEW " :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
No point in beating around the bush there !!!
Please, -- The name Vagina sounds more apt.
there aint no beating round my bush, cos i dnt have 1 hahaha xx
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 020246 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/escorts/english-taylor-british-female-escort.html)
I have just messaged you sarah about this review, i beleive it to be fake & not just because its a negative review. He says he cant remember exact date & time. As in the rule listed in 'reviews FAQs' below:
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
So why has it been posted?? I have also added my comment back to this review & anyone interested in having a laugh Please read with a cuppa!! xxx
Why are reviews by new reviewers who can't remember the exact date or reviews more than the 3 months rule still tolerated. It's unfair to the girl and misleading to customers. Another example, appears to be a rehash of all other comments...
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 020298 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies (https://www.escort-ireland.com/20298/Viky/review.html)
WhenLoveComesToTown
10-02-10, 00:08
Thats very unfair Taylor and I'm sure Sarah or one of the MODs will have it removed:)
But anyone familiar with this site can usually smell a "rat" a mile away so if one slips by the MODs we still know a fake review when we see one!
I noticed how many positive reviews you have .... & WOW!!:)
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 10:15
Thats very unfair Taylor and I'm sure Sarah or one of the MODs will have it removed:)
But anyone familiar with this site can usually smell a "rat" a mile away so if one slips by the MODs we still know a fake review when we see one!
I noticed how many positive reviews you have .... & WOW!!:)
Awww thankyou Mr. fussy & Whenlovecomestotown. I messaged them to say i wanted it ratted & it got ratted, however it does clearly break the rule, so cnt understand y its up there anyway, ive not had no reply from any of the review moderators, not even a reply back to the PM i sent, seems im being ignored completeley, Im just not important, neither is my business, nor that i pay £90/wk. xxxx
I can't believe what i've just read.
Taylor you are defintely an absolute diamond and one of the best escorts i've ever had the pleasure to meet.
Friendly . very welcoming , sexy of f ck with a cracking attitude and i have you sitting proudly in my top 3 .
Anyone else who has had the pleasure would agree and these fake reviews need to be stopped.
It seems to me the English ladies get more stick than any other. This has to be because they are so good.
Maxi x
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 12:24
Awww thankyou Mr. fussy & Whenlovecomestotown. I messaged them to say i wanted it ratted & it got ratted, however it does clearly break the rule, so cnt understand y its up there anyway, ive not had no reply from any of the review moderators, not even a reply back to the PM i sent, seems im being ignored completeley, Im just not important, neither is my business, nor that i pay £90/wk. xxxx
Your issue is being discussed and not being ignored. The reviewer says sometime last year which if December puts him within 3 month rule but I feel the rule about stating a time over rides that and he puts a date in 2010 for that which contradicts what he says in review but I am not the deciding mod but that is my opinion and stated it in said discussion.
The review just reads all "wrong".
I havent met Taylor yet but this smells of crap a mile off ......
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 14:26
I can't believe what i've just read.
Taylor you are defintely an absolute diamond and one of the best escorts i've ever had the pleasure to meet.
Friendly . very welcoming , sexy of f ck with a cracking attitude and i have you sitting proudly in my top 3 .
Anyone else who has had the pleasure would agree and these fake reviews need to be stopped.
It seems to me the English ladies get more stick than any other. This has to be because they are so good.
Maxi x
Thankyou mr. maxi it was a pleasure meeting you & im happy & shocked that im in your top3 xxxxxx
Your issue is being discussed and not being ignored. The reviewer says sometime last year which if December puts him within 3 month rule but I feel the rule about stating a time over rides that and he puts a date in 2010 for that which contradicts what he says in review but I am not the deciding mod but that is my opinion and stated it in said discussion.
Thankyou for informing me of this, but i did also state to sarah in my PM that at chrismas when i was in dublin i did a few jobs, it was dead & the jobs i did do i only saw my REGULARS. (gods honest truth i have no reason to lie) Before christmas the last time i was in dublin was back in august & it it was then when he was talking about i cant recall that far back so i cant defend myself on that. Ive held my hands up to the couple of bad reviews ive had before & held my hands up that they were genuine even though 1 was from the guy who i reported a bad client, i was really scared that he would hurt me. All in all thankyou for your reply, dublin is bad for me to get new clients & since the review was posted yest. i havent done any work, so it is affecting me xxxx
The review just reads all "wrong".
I havent met Taylor yet but this smells of crap a mile off ......
Get ur ass to see me, hope you enjoyed your visit to manc & the lap dancing clubs xxxxx
Mr Serious
10-02-10, 15:36
Firstly I am not a fake reviewer secondly I wasn't aware that you were not allowed to post a review three months after the event.
The purpose of a review system is for individuals to express there opinion and give an account of their experience. Maybe others had a positive experience but I did not and gave my honest opinion and stated how I felt after my experience.
I have however had many positive experiences and decided to post reviews on two escorts at the same time as I posted a review on Taylor. It has been my experience that there is much better available and much worse than Taylor but all said and done I was not completely satisfied with the service and posted my review........
Go figure
i have read mr.serious reviews and have read more reviews on taylor...i have had the pleasure of chattin to taylor and the review just does not match the lady i chatted with(on this site) or the other reviews FALSE REVIEWS ARE NOT FAIR ON ESCORTS END OF STORY THEY SHOULD BE BANNED:mad:
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 16:10
Firstly I am not a fake reviewer secondly I wasn't aware that you were not allowed to post a review three months after the event.
The purpose of a review system is for individuals to express there opinion and give an account of their experience. Maybe others had a positive experience but I did not and gave my honest opinion and stated how I felt after my experience.
I have however had many positive experiences and decided to post reviews on two escorts at the same time as I posted a review on Taylor. It has been my experience that there is much better available and much worse than Taylor but all said and done I was not completely satisfied with the service and posted my review........
Go figure
Finally you speak & now we can get this cleared up. You say i have no respect, what does 'go figure mean' in my streetwise term that is direspectful & a polite way of saying f*** off. Im sorry if you felt it was a bad service but no expalnation as to y. If you disrespect me u will be disrespected back, treat others how you wish to be treated. As my clients also know if you respect my boundaries you get an exceptional service. What is ones man heaven may be another mans hell. It is not the escorts fault if you dont connect with her & thus that can give you a knock on effect that you dont enjoy your experience. But seen as i cant recall you, you could have been one of them guys that thinks because hes handed money over that he owns you, can do & act as he wants. I do not allow a client to think im their toy. Like you say you gave an opinion, but it definately doesnt read like that, more like a slagging off with no explanation. Oh and to say my photos arent accurate, well says it all. Thanx for the shitty review anyway, happy punting!!
well there ya have it mr serious has just admitted that the appointment was over 3 months ago wich is a rule breach for sure now so the review should be removed......but at the time of writing this it is still there.....come on mods get your fingers out. ignorance of a rule if no defence.
Firstly I am not a fake reviewer secondly I wasn't aware that you were not allowed to post a review three months after the event.
The purpose of a review system is for individuals to express there opinion and give an account of their experience. Maybe others had a positive experience but I did not and gave my honest opinion and stated how I felt after my experience.
I have however had many positive experiences and decided to post reviews on two escorts at the same time as I posted a review on Taylor. It has been my experience that there is much better available and much worse than Taylor but all said and done I was not completely satisfied with the service and posted my review........
Go figure
I accept that everyone has their own view on what is attractive and what's not, but to say Taylor is 'unattractive' or 'not the best looking' is pretty harsh. I met Taylor in December and she definitely ranks highly on the attractiveness scale. She is also very friendly and definitely not a clock watcher so your 'revolving door' comment is nonsense. The only part of your review that I would agree with is 'great body'. What an ass!!!
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 17:06
Firstly I am not a fake reviewer secondly I wasn't aware that you were not allowed to post a review three months after the event.
The purpose of a review system is for individuals to express there opinion and give an account of their experience. Maybe others had a positive experience but I did not and gave my honest opinion and stated how I felt after my experience.
I have however had many positive experiences and decided to post reviews on two escorts at the same time as I posted a review on Taylor. It has been my experience that there is much better available and much worse than Taylor but all said and done I was not completely satisfied with the service and posted my review........
Go figure
You said it was sometime last year but can't remember when, thats fair enough but can you rule in or rule out the month of December please? Were the days long or short for example when you had this booking?
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 17:08
well there ya have it mr serious has just admitted that the appointment was over 3 months ago wich is a rule breach for sure now so the review should be removed......but at the time of writing this it is still there.....come on mods get your fingers out. ignorance of a rule if no defence.
very well put Jay, nicely pointed out. Just await for action now. Until then i will waste my £90 ADVERTISING, then when my advert is down 2moro, something might be done then, but ive lost 2 days work already. So maybe i will just take my business elsewhere..................
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 17:16
well there ya have it mr serious has just admitted that the appointment was over 3 months ago wich is a rule breach for sure now so the review should be removed......but at the time of writing this it is still there.....come on mods get your fingers out. ignorance of a rule if no defence.
He never said that, he said he was not aware of the 3 month rule after "the event". He never said "the event" was his booking but was meant possibly meant as generic.
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 17:17
You said it was sometime last year but can't remember when, thats fair enough but can you rule in or rule out the month of December please? Were the days long or short for example when you had this booking?
hes admitted he didnt knw the rule, so of course it was back in the summer, but now your allowing him to retract that admittance of the rule by asking him to clarify december or not, when ive stated i was there in december & he will click onto that fact & say yes just to spite me. God i give up, im gunna opt out of the reviews system until the NEW reviews system is in place.
hes admitted he didnt knw the rule, so of course it was back in the summer, but now your allowing him to retract that admittance of the rule by asking him to clarify december or not, when ive stated i was there in december & he will click onto that fact & say yes just to spite me. God i give up, im gunna opt out of the reviews system until the NEW reviews system is in place.
If you opt out of the "review system" it will have an adverse affect on your business, as a lot of users will think that there is something dodgy about you.
I guess you are going to end up being punished for E-I's weakness and still the review and photo argument goes on...and on... and on....
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 17:25
He never said that, he said he was not aware of the 3 month rule after "the event". He never said "the event" was his booking but was meant possibly meant as generic.
he did say it, he has said he wasnt aware of the rule, my first post on this thread was why this review was allowed when it didnt cover the 3month rule. Mr. Serious has admitted not being aware of the rule, but does not then go onto say that it was within the 3month rule. But now he knows i was in dublin just before christmas, he will say it was then just to spite, like i said im opting out of reviews on my next trip whenever that may be. Thats all am saying on this subject now. Goodbye all xxxxxxx
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 17:27
hes admitted he didnt knw the rule, so of course it was back in the summer, but now your allowing him to retract that admittance of the rule by asking him to clarify december or not, when ive stated i was there in december & he will click onto that fact & say yes just to spite me. God i give up, im gunna opt out of the reviews system until the NEW reviews system is in place.
He admitted he did not know the rule, that does not mean he is still outside the 3 month time limit, we have to be fair to both sides.
Most people will read into someone not being able to recall a date of booking only a couple of months ago and then changing his mind and saying he has remembered it was December.
EnglishTaylor
10-02-10, 17:28
If you opt out of the "review system" it will have an adverse affect on your business, as a lot of users will think that there is something dodgy about you.
I guess you are going to end up being punished for E-I's weakness and still the review and photo argument goes on...and on... and on....
i know that, but my business is shite anyway, im a manc so of course im dodgy, really tired with the E-I website anyhow, its just full of problems, oh well role on future working back in England xxx
i know that, but my business is shite anyway, im a manc so of course im dodgy, really tired with the E-I website anyhow, its just full of problems, oh well role on future working back in England xxx
It could be worse... you could be Scouse......;)
carlos marvado
10-02-10, 17:40
Yo bro. You registered your user name on 04.02.2010 and posted 3 reviews on the 08.02.2010.
I have ip check evidence that you registered a second user name, Mr. Realistic, today.
What gives?
He admitted he did not know the rule, that does not mean he is still outside the 3 month time limit, we have to be fair to both sides.
Most people will read into someone not being able to recall a date of booking only a couple of months ago and then changing his mind and saying he has remembered it was December.
Mr Serious has two reviews (one psoitive/one negative) where he cannot remember when the encounter took place, just 'sometime last year' but the date in the review is down as Feb 2010, which by his own admission is inaccurate. On that basis alone, the reviews should be removed, as he put an incorrect date to circumvent the 3 month rule.
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 18:16
Mr Serious has two reviews (one psoitive/one negative) where he cannot remember when the encounter took place, just 'sometime last year' but the date in the review is down as Feb 2010, which by his own admission is inaccurate. On that basis alone, the reviews should be removed, as he put an incorrect date to circumvent the 3 month rule.
I agree and said as much in an earlier post. Its for Sarah and Ric to rule on this and Ric as most know is a nightowl here and Sarah may be busy on other matters. I am just responding mostly as Taylor expressed a feeling of being ignored on the matter but in fact we (com mods) are discussing this.
Mr Serious
10-02-10, 18:17
Your right about the pictures........ I was not used to the system and ticked very disatisfied instead of very satisfied my fault entirely and unfortunately the system won't let me correct that mistake.
Just to clarify and comment I don't expect to use anyone as a toy and I am not a person to force myself or my personality on anyone either. I generally give respect in order to receive it and it's true what you say maybe it was a clash of personalities but only because I found you terribly bland and overconfidented your own comments on your profile support this but maybe I caught you on a bad day. I didn't however find you overly attractive and I was drawn to your profile by the other reviews and your fabulous body as the pictures you post accurately portray that being said I stand by previous comments and did find the service lacking. I am sorry if you find this offensive but hey I thought the customer was always right and when I say go figure it means just because you get a bad review doesn't mean it's fake.
adogwithabone
10-02-10, 18:20
On balance, I believe that the reviews by Mr Serious are genuine. Clearly, E.T. and himself did not exactly get on too well together and his experience was very different to most others. However it is also clear from all that E.T. has said that his may not be a unique experience. She seems more focused on getting the review struck out on a technicality than denying that it could be true.
No escort can be on top form every day with every client. Even the best wil get the odd bad review. In my view an escort can turn a bad review into a good one by reponding something like -'I do not recall our meeting. I like to think that everyone leaves me, happy with the experience. Obviously you were not and this is reflected in what you say about me, I would like to try to change your opinion of me and would be happy to meet you again at half price if you pm me.'
This type of reponse would tell me that this is an escort that I would like to meet. The response that E.T. actually posted tells me that Mr Serious was probably correct.
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 18:23
Your right about the pictures........ I was not used to the system and ticked very disatisfied instead of very satisfied my fault entirely and unfortunately the system won't let me correct that mistake.
Just to clarify and comment I don't expect to use anyone as a toy and I am not a person to force myself or my personality on anyone either. I generally give respect in order to receive it and it's true what you say maybe it was a clash of personalities but only because I found you terribly bland and overconfidented your own comments on your profile support this but maybe I caught you on a bad day. I didn't however find you overly attractive and I was drawn to your profile by the other reviews and your fabulous body as the pictures you post accurately portray that being said I stand by previous comments and did find the service lacking. I am sorry if you find this offensive but hey I thought the customer was always right and when I say go figure it means just because you get a bad review doesn't mean it's fake.
There is no need to in effect post another review of her here, thats what reviews are for. The issue is not really about that anymore but getting to the bottom of when (to within the nearest season would help) you saw her. If you cannot do that then we may have to remove review entirely.
On balance, I believe that the reviews by Mr Serious are genuine. Clearly, E.T. and himself did not exactly get on too well together and his experience was very different to most others. However it is also clear from all that E.T. has said that his may not be a unique experience. She seems more focused on getting the review struck out on a technicality than denying that it could be true.
No escort can be on top form every day with every client. Even the best wil get the odd bad review. In my view an escort can turn a bad review into a good one by reponding something like -'I do not recall our meeting. I like to think that everyone leaves me, happy with the experience. Obviously you were not and this is reflected in what you say about me, I would like to try to change your opinion of me and would be happy to meet you again at half price if you pm me.'
This type of reponse would tell me that this is an escort that I would like to meet. The response that E.T. actually posted tells me that Mr Serious was probably correct.
Very good point,and i agree with your views.Fairplay to you for sticking your neck out and saying that.
Mr Serious
10-02-10, 18:26
Sorry website crashed when registering original user didn't know Mr. Realistic had been entered - can't believe I'm getting all this hastle because I posted a bad review so glad I took the time to do so now ............ NOT
Mr Serious
10-02-10, 18:28
I agree completely as appointment was in the summer not within three months of posting apologies to everyone but I still stand by my comments and wonder why this rule is in place as my comments are of my experience and factual.
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 18:29
I agree completely as appointment was in the summer not within three months of posting apologies to everyone but I still stand by my comments and wonder why this rule is in place as my comments are of my experience and factual.
Grand job and thank you for your honesty. I will delete that review as its outside the 3 month rule.
carlos marvado
10-02-10, 18:49
Sorry website crashed when registering original user didn't know Mr. Realistic had been entered - can't believe I'm getting all this hastle because I posted a bad review so glad I took the time to do so now ............ NOT
Don't follow this. Your original user name is Mr Serious. You've written your reviews and posted on threads with that user name.........so you know that that user name works.......so why the need to register Mr. Realistic today?
Mr Serious
10-02-10, 19:01
Originally tried to register mr.realistic on the same day in february before I registered mr serious system crashed. Been using mr. serious since that day posted a review that day of irish alex never showed on system either never attempted to register anyother user since then not sure why mr. realistic is showing up now maybe you can explain.
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 19:38
I would like to try to change your opinion of me and would be happy to meet you again at half price if you pm me.'
This type of reponse would tell me that this is an escort that I would like to meet. The response that E.T. actually posted tells me that Mr Serious was probably correct.
Come on!!! If an Escort did that the word would go around and she would get nothing but bad reviews from people looking for a half price booking.
Plus she cannot win as it could also be painted as her trying to buy his silence or buy a good review.
Personally I would prefer to consider booking an Escort who comes out and defends herself as that goes a long long way to showing she is truly independent and not some poor soul brow beaten into doing some pimps bidding so I support any Escort to come on here and speak her mind when it directly affects her pocket just as a bad punt affects a Clients pocket.
I think it's a pity when the review process forces a girl with so many good reviews to consider opting out of the system due to the fact that it's unfair, and as pointed out, is not even sticking to it's own rules, not just in this case but in others. That's it from me for any further reviews, no great loss to EI, but no more reviews from me until system is changed.
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 22:46
I think it's a pity when the review process forces a girl with so many good reviews to consider opting out of the system due to the fact that it's unfair, and as pointed out, is not even sticking to it's own rules, not just in this case but in others. That's it from me for any further reviews, no great loss to EI, but no more reviews from me until system is changed.
So your taking the George Lee approach and packing your bags and not working from within to aid reviews?
You may not realize it but genuine reviewers are aiding reviews simply by posting them.
So your taking the George Lee approach and packing your bags and not working from within to aid reviews?
You may not realize it but genuine reviewers are aiding reviews simply by posting them.
Please QPH, over 50 reviews, most of my posts are in relation to reviews, fakes etc. I am not doing a GL, I just think when it comes to escorts, who I know are genuine, wanting to opt out, then action is needed. I cannot stand the can't remember when or more recently a new user posting positive reviews for escorts met ages ago...Jesus, if it was that good, post when the memory is fresh...Anyways action is required, it's been needed for a long time in relation to reviews and the verified/changing photos situation but nothing done. So for me, no more reviews, unlike GL I will still be active, just not contributing to the reviews.....
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 23:01
I just mean that the fewer genuine reviews posted in order to make a valid protest that the pool of trustworthy reviews in among the dross get more and more diluted.
I just mean that the fewer genuine reviews posted in order to make a valid protest that the pool of trustworthy reviews in among the dross get more and more diluted.
The problems need to be addressed, i.e. fake / bogus / fantasy reviews, photo verification. The dross is now the norm, action is required and I don't see why I should comply with the current system, which is not even being enforced....let it dilute further, then perhaps something will change...I hope it does change soon.
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 23:22
The problems need to be addressed, i.e. fake / bogus / fantasy reviews, photo verification. The dross is now the norm, action is required and I don't see why I should comply with the current system, which is not even being enforced....let it dilute further, then perhaps something will change...I hope it does change soon.
No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
Problem here now we have a field of weeds and very little wheat:mad::mad::mad:
No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
Comply as in appearing to agree with the system...even wheat fields need thorough harvesting...otherwise the weeds takes over...
No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
This girl is a lovely lady. I don't know what happened between the two people.... however, I have met her twice and I have found her to be lovely.
I think that it is important to remember that revews are based on chemistry as much as anything else and maybe the two pwoplw involved did not have that chemistry. In any event, this story as with so many more has been blown out of all proportion. He didn't like her, she responded and now we are all giving our two cents worth.
I am a reader rather than a writer of reviews and am aware that I will be roasted because of that. I can take it..... If I had something to add, I would do so. Some people are better at reviewing than others, in the same way that some mods are better at some aspects of moderating than others..
Does this make sense to everyone? or even, anyone?
BLD
WhenLoveComesToTown
10-02-10, 23:47
[QUOTE=I will still be active, just not contributing to the reviews.....[/QUOTE]
Mr Fussy I understand your frustration but I think you'd be doing more harm than good by opting out of reviews.
Also, for me (never mind the badge) you are one of my most Trusted Reviewers and I truely value your recommendations.
I think that goes for the majority of regular users of EI too.
Please don't strop reviewing ... You'd be too big a loss to this community!!
Quarterpoundher
10-02-10, 23:55
Comply as in appearing to agree with the system...even wheat fields need thorough harvesting...otherwise the weeds takes over...
Thats what I am saying, honest reviews are the wheat, you are saying that instead of allowing others to reap what you had sown you will instead plow your reviews into the soil before being harvested by those who might go on your recommendations.
I am saying that yes weed control is needed, however what type? there are only two ways to control the weeds in reviews.
Organic... IE the way things are and we muddle along picking out the odd one we get IP info for an never really getting anywhere.
or
We nuke reviews with every spray known to man and delete anything with a whiff of being fake even when that is just a vague hunch.
That requires forum to get on board and agree to that or else we will be accused of being to heavy handed.
For instance there are lots of reviews being placed lately by profiles that have all joined up on same day, none have any other link, nothing but same date of joining.
So
What do we do?
Delete all of them including a few real ones that might be among them?
Mr Fussy I understand your frustration but I think you'd be doing more harm than good by opting out of reviews.
Also, for me (never mind the badge) you are one of my most Trusted Reviewers and I truely value your recommendations.
I think that goes for the majority of regular users of EI too.
Please don't strop reviewing ... You'd be too big a loss to this community!!
No, it's gone too far when you can read the latest reviews and spot the bogus one's, the can't remember syndrome etc. Also it's not fair on girls either that some are fake but not reported as such. People can PM me and I'll give details of girls I have visited but that's it from me until things improve.
WhenLoveComesToTown
11-02-10, 00:00
Ok - I support your decision & Thanks, I'll take you up on the PM offer :)
adogwithabone
11-02-10, 00:03
Come on!!! If an Escort did that the word would go around and she would get nothing but bad reviews from people looking for a half price booking.
Plus she cannot win as it could also be painted as her trying to buy his silence or buy a good review.
Personally I would prefer to consider booking an Escort who comes out and defends herself as that goes a long long way to showing she is truly independent and not some poor soul brow beaten into doing some pimps bidding so I support any Escort to come on here and speak her mind when it directly affects her pocket just as a bad punt affects a Clients pocket.
Actually, it would be a very smart move on the part of an escort as if she got any more bad reviews, everyone would asume that it was just some cheapskate looking for a cheap shag!!
The reality is that anyone looking at a long list of reviews, nearly all good, is going to look at the odd bad one to see what was wrong. If an escort indicates that she is disappointed that the client did not enjoy himself and makes an offer to try to put things right, that tells me two things. Firstly, it tells me that the escort has a good attitude and secondly that the reviewer was probably a tosser anyway. I would go to see that escort.
The worst part of the review in question was not what Mr Serious said but E.T.'s reaction to it and her attempts to get it disallowed by a technicality. In spite of all the good reviews that she has, I would not go near her.
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 00:11
Actually, it would be a very smart move on the part of an escort as if she got any more bad reviews, everyone would asume that it was just some cheapskate looking for a cheap shag!!
The reality is that anyone looking at a long list of reviews, nearly all good, is going to look at the odd bad one to see what was wrong. If an escort indicates that she is disappointed that the client did not enjoy himself and makes an offer to try to put things right, that tells me two things. Firstly, it tells me that the escort has a good attitude and secondly that the reviewer was probably a tosser anyway. I would go to see that escort.
The worst part of the review in question was not what Mr Serious said but E.T.'s reaction to it and her attempts to get it disallowed by a technicality. In spite of all the good reviews that she has, I would not go near her.
What if after seeing him a second time and pulling out the stops he has got his half price oats but still posts another negative, she is out of pocket and lost time. How does she prove she did her best the second time?. It might be a runner and worth her while if he had a few reviews but in this case its someone who only joined a few days ago, you can't expect her to walk out on a limb and take a cut in pay on such an unknown quantity.
Can I just say this,
The way that the reviews were operating was ok if not perfect.
Therefore, reviews that were logged by new or inactive profiles were tagged. So, why did i need to be changed? I think, as a reader of reviews, that I can make up my own mind on what is a real or fake review based on ability to write in language that I believe to be from a real punter, either Irish or foreign.... Surely the rest of us can also see vernacular as distinct from a fake review. I would agree that I dont believe all reviews whether ratted or not, but I rely on my own intelligence, doesn't everyone else think the same way?
BLD
adogwithabone
11-02-10, 00:27
Can I just say this,
The way that the reviews were operating was ok if not perfect.
Therefore, reviews that were logged by new or inactive profiles were tagged. So, why did i need to be changed? I think, as a reader of reviews, that I can make up my own mind on what is a real or fake review based on ability to write in language that I believe to be from a real punter, either Irish or foreign.... Surely the rest of us can also see vernacular as distinct from a fake review. I would agree that I dont believe all reviews whether ratted or not, but I rely on my own intelligence, doesn't everyone else think the same way?
BLD
I think that most of us here have a good idea which reviews are genuine and which are not. However, the level of fake reviews is annoying. For instance;
Escort Reviews of Rafaela, Irish escort from Escort Ireland (https://www.escort-ireland.com/1596/escort/Rafaela/escort-reviews.html)
This is a real expert in fake reviews. I would guess that about 90% of her positive reviews are fake. I do not understand why the latest half dozen have not been ratted yet.
adogwithabone
11-02-10, 00:31
What if after seeing him a second time and pulling out the stops he has got his half price oats but still posts another negative, she is out of pocket and lost time. How does she prove she did her best the second time?. It might be a runner and worth her while if he had a few reviews but in this case its someone who only joined a few days ago, you can't expect her to walk out on a limb and take a cut in pay on such an unknown quantity.
Will you stop being so dense. The point is that she made the effort and thats what most of us want to see - an escort who makes a genuine effort to please.
I think that most of us here have a good idea which reviews are genuine and which are not. However, the level of fake reviews is annoying. For instance;
Escort Reviews of Rafaela, Irish escort from Escort Ireland (https://www.escort-ireland.com/1596/escort/Rafaela/escort-reviews.html)
This is a real expert in fake reviews. I would guess that about 90% of her positive reviews are fake. I do not understand why the latest half dozen have not been ratted yet.
Hey mate
can i suggest that if you read the reviews that you will be able to figure out that if they arent written by people whose first language isn't english, that they are either blatantly rattable or that they are copied from other reviews.
If she really wants to beat the syatem, she can go to different internet cafes to beat the IP tracker checking....
I know there are holes in my argument but it covers most of the bases???????
BLD
adogwithabone
11-02-10, 00:47
Hey mate
can i suggest that if you read the reviews that you will be able to figure out that if they arent written by people whose first language isn't english, that they are either blatantly rattable or that they are copied from other reviews.
If she really wants to beat the syatem, she can go to different internet cafes to beat the IP tracker checking....
I know there are holes in my argument but it covers most of the bases???????
BLD
I have found it interesting recently, not just to look at a girls reviews but to look at who else the reviewers have reviewed. It can be quite enlightening as in the case of Rafaela
I think it's a pity when the review process forces a girl with so many good reviews to consider opting out of the system due to the fact that it's unfair, and as pointed out, is not even sticking to it's own rules, not just in this case but in others. That's it from me for any further reviews, no great loss to EI, but no more reviews from me until system is changed.
i dont really blame you one bit mr fussy. mr serious has admitted to at least 2 rule breaches in this thread one is that the appointment was over 3 months ago and two is he has more than one username and yet the mods say they cant take action and the people that can take action are totally absent from this thread.......whats up with that?????
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 17:05
i dont really blame you one bit mr fussy. mr serious has admitted to at least 2 rule breaches in this thread one is that the appointment was over 3 months ago and two is he has more than one username and yet the mods say they cant take action and the people that can take action are totally absent from this thread.......whats up with that?????
The instant he confirmed it was outside 3 months the review was deleted, prior to that it was not in my view clear enough to warrant deletion, its not an easy thing to get a review deleted here and all are aware. I can't just delete left right and center I have to be fair to both sides. Now to his credit he said it was last Summer, he could have been awkward and said is was in December. What he says about his other profile checks out as it was created on the same day as his active one but his old one is still awaiting email activation.
and yet you said only ric or sarah could and i was pointing out that neither of them have responded to taylors orignal post.
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 17:15
and yet you said only ric or sarah could and i was pointing out that neither of them have responded to taylors orignal post.
I could when he confirmed it beyond doubt, it was only a formality after that confirmation, before that I could not, or rather I would prefer to leave it to them as they are in overall charge of that, I just help out on the small stuff and responded to this as no one else had.
can i just point out that according to another mod "carlos" he registered one id on the 4th and another on the 10th wich is 6 days appart if my math is correct and that does not check out with mr serious's posts or what you have said.
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 17:50
can i just point out that according to another mod "carlos" he registered one id on the 4th and another on the 10th wich is 6 days appart if my math is correct and that does not check out with mr serious's posts or what you have said.
No, he created both on the same day. The 4th of Feb. We need to give him a break here, he has been honest and stated what time of year review was, maybe late in doing so but he still did it and what he says about his profiles checks out.
No, he created both on the same day. The 4th of Feb. We need to give him a break here, he has been honest and stated what time of year review was, maybe late in doing so but he still did it and what he says about his profiles checks out.
i have to say i find it a bit strange that one mod says he has ip proof that they were created 6 days appart and another mod says no the same day. who are we to believe you or carlos???
EnglishTaylor
11-02-10, 18:10
Will you stop being so dense. The point is that she made the effort and thats what most of us want to see - an escort who makes a genuine effort to please.
Im sorry i even started this thread. You ADOGWITHABONE need to understand that that i am ver professional in my job, i am the most genuine escort you would ever meet because there is simply nothing fake about me & i am always striving to please every client that comes through the door wether hes got dog breath, a cheesy unclean package, is rude to me or just plain boring!!! I reply to my negative reviews as i see fit, i will not fake a dizzy sweet reply to put things right, im honest in what i say & im glad you wouldnt come anywhere near me, you obviously cant handle my personality & the fact that im probably way to dominant for you. When i 1st read the review, the date recolation was the 1st thing i noticed as i like to recall exactly who the client was so i can say a personal thankyou to them for a good review or at least rack my brains if it was a client who i would never see again (for many reasons) so that i can defend myself. How unfair is it that us escorts arent allowed to review you guys??? (BELIEVE ME IM NOT ON MY OWN IN MAKING THAT STATEMENT). Secondly i used to work for an agency who used to send me over here, they still send their girls out working as independents, ever since i decided i wanted to work for myself over here they have been trying to ruin my business, so when reading my latest review, as i couldnt recall the guy through lack of info. i presumed it was them, im not going into more detail about this as it does not concern you. Last thing is tht some escorts simply dont respond to bad reviews & those who do simply wont give a response like i do, ive had PMs & comments from girls patting me on the back for standing up to you punters & telling you how i see it.
Anyway i could go on & on, i am a defensive girl i always have been & this in turn may scare guys away bcos im a tough cookie. For whatever went on in this booking, for all the stuff that has been said, both sides of the arguements defended & for the little pet with his bone....thankyou for the input, support & constructive critism. xxxxxx
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 18:16
i have to say i find it a bit strange that one mod says he has ip proof that they were created 6 days appart and another mod says no the same day. who are we to believe you or carlos???
Its called being human, I am sure Carlos will confirm what i am saying. There is proof of two profiles belonging to him but they were not created days apart but on the same day, 4th of Feb.
Its called being human, I am sure Carlos will confirm what i am saying. There is proof of two profiles belonging to him but they were not created days apart but on the same day, 4th of Feb.
only if he goes back on what he said about having proof that they were created 6 days appart and i really hope he does not because i have always found carlos to be honest and claiming to have proof of something when there is no proof is something that a site mod should never do.
Yo bro. You registered your user name on 04.02.2010 and posted 3 reviews on the 08.02.2010.
I have ip check evidence that you registered a second user name, Mr. Realistic, today.
What gives?
heres the post i'm talking about.
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 18:29
Will you stop being so dense. The point is that she made the effort and thats what most of us want to see - an escort who makes a genuine effort to please.
Its not being dense its called putting forward a counter argument. The Escort that does this and is known to do this will in reality attract every tight arse in the country trying to get a cut rate leg over.
She would, by cutting her rate to half be taking a punt herself, she would be gambling her time and money on hoping he would be honerable in his second review. That's even assuming he would write one at all.
Escorts dont punt, they will have another knocking on the door willing to pay full rate so why waste time and money on "hoping" he will then post a positive review.
For the odd occasion she would do this she would have to run the risk of people writing a bad one so as to get a reduced rate the next time. It might be a runner when that person is a known reviewer here. I already said that, my point is she cannot be expected to do that for someone with a couple of reviews.
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 18:45
heres the post i'm talking about.
And here are both profiles date of creation... (see att. pics).
And here are both profiles date of creation... (see att. pics).
well i guess we will just have to wait and see what type of ip proof carlos has since it was him that first made that claim. and i dont think that saying you have proof of something is a simple mistake to make.
How unfair is it that us escorts arent allowed to review you guys??? (BELIEVE ME IM NOT ON MY OWN IN MAKING THAT STATEMENT)
There was a little list doing the rounds that said differently.............:rolleyes:
Anyway, Talyor, Sweetie, you, a Gods gift to any red blooded man, may, to break from the norm, and just to keep you happy, review me...........
My profile is down at the moment..........:o.........(money troubles)..........:o......but you can PM me for details of my rates, all extras are included, I can't post the rates here, someone will complain..........:rolleyes:.............and then the mods will be in trouble again..............:rolleyes:..........And if I don't get my profile back up soon you have my full permission to post the review in general chat, not in the warning section, or the soap section, (nothing to warn or laugh about.........I hope...........:o).....for all to see...........
Here, just fill this in.........:hug:....:kiss:
Escort(s):
Reviewer:
Join Date:
Message Board Usergroup:
Message Board Posts:
Reviews:
Type:
Location:
Incall or Outcall:
Time / Date:
Duration:
Cost:
Review:
Favourites Enjoyed:
Accuracy of Photos:
Incall Location:
Physical Appearance:
Service Provided:
Value for Money:
Overall Satisfaction
Would You Recommend?
Would You See Again?:
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 19:00
well i guess we will just have to wait and see what type of ip proof carlos has since it was him that first made that claim. and i dont think that saying you have proof of something is a simple mistake to make.
Fine. I can do no more then show you both his profile creation dates as shown on pics.
well i guess we will just have to wait and see what type of ip proof carlos has since it was him that first made that claim. and i dont think that saying you have proof of something is a simple mistake to make.
The man is human, if he made a mistake he made a mistake, what's the big fascination with this? It's an honest mistake, let it go man..........
EnglishTaylor
11-02-10, 19:48
There was a little list doing the rounds that said differently.............:rolleyes:
Anyway, Talyor, Sweetie, you, a Gods gift to any red blooded man, may, to break from the norm, and just to keep you happy, review me...........
My profile is down at the moment..........:o.........(money troubles)..........:o......but you can PM me for details of my rates, all extras are included, I can't post the rates here, someone will complain..........:rolleyes:.............and then the mods will be in trouble again..............:rolleyes:..........And if I don't get my profile back up soon you have my full permission to post the review in general chat, not in the warning section, or the soap section, (nothing to warn or laugh about.........I hope...........:o).....for all to see...........
Here, just fill this in.........:hug:....:kiss:
Escort(s):
Reviewer:
Join Date:
Message Board Usergroup:
Message Board Posts:
Reviews:
Type:
Location:
Incall or Outcall:
Time / Date:
Duration:
Cost:
Review:
Favourites Enjoyed:
Accuracy of Photos:
Incall Location:
Physical Appearance:
Service Provided:
Value for Money:
Overall Satisfaction
Would You Recommend?
Would You See Again?:
awww thanx Luther i will definately review you over the weekend, must i must see you before otherwise it will be a fake review, but given the current state of affairs im sure a people will turn a blindeye??? hahahaha xxxxxxxxx
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 20:03
awww thanx Luther i will definately review you over the weekend, must i must see you before otherwise it will be a fake review, but given the current state of affairs im sure a people will turn a blindeye??? hahahaha xxxxxxxxx
He gets a little stroppy if you don't show up with a gift but treat him right and he will repay you in spades.
Thanks Lu... see you next time ;)
awww thanx Luther i will definately review you over the weekend, must i must see you before otherwise it will be a fake review, but given the current state of affairs im sure a people will turn a blindeye??? hahahaha xxxxxxxxx
I can see neither of us gaining anything from a fake encounter..............
My rates are very competitive, but for you there'll be an extra spacial discount..........;)..........:kiss:
He gets a little stroppy if you don't show up with a gift but treat him right and he will repay you in spades.
Thanks Lu... see you next time ;)
You won't forget the next time will you ....................adult-spank
PS - I know this thread is off topic but the previously mentioned review has already been deleted...........
Reading this thread I think it's blatantly obvious that these 2 just didn't hit it off so i wouldn't hold it against either of them. I believe his review was honest as he seen it, but I also think it was out of character for Taylor judging by her previous reviews. Personally both sides could have handled the situation differently (better).
If it's any consolation Taylor I think it has drawn attention to your previous extensive list of positive reviews and I for one have moved you up my Ladies I'd like to see list :o
Quarterpoundher
11-02-10, 21:28
You won't forget the next time will you ....................adult-spank
ohhh so noooow domination is on the menu again? That was the reason for my last bad review of you...
God I hate it when Escorts say one thing on fav's and not when you show up :mad:
How unfair is it that us escorts arent allowed to review you guys???
If you pay me €200 per hr , you can gladly review me:rolleyes:
If you pay me €200 per hr , you can gladly review me:rolleyes:
How come I wasn't allowed to mention my rates..........:o
I feel a bidding war coming on..............:D
The man is human, if he made a mistake he made a mistake, what's the big fascination with this? It's an honest mistake, let it go man..........
so far carlos has not said he has made a mistake but he has said he has ip evedience of what he has claimed and if he has made a mistake i feel that its a very big mistake to make to claim to have evedience of something as i have seen here lots of reviews and the such that say same ip as another member so how do we know they wernt all mistakes too.
carlos marvado
12-02-10, 15:01
so far carlos has not said he has made a mistake but he has said he has ip evedience of what he has claimed and if he has made a mistake i feel that its a very big mistake to make to claim to have evedience of something as i have seen here lots of reviews and the such that say same ip as another member so how do we know they wernt all mistakes too.
Happy to clear up my mistake. When I originally looked at who was on-line on 10.02.2010, is showed me that Mr. Realistic was registering (rather than logging in), so my assumption was that the user name Mr. Realistic was only being registered there and then. An IP check then showed me that Mr. Realistic shared an IP address with Mr Perfect, however it does not show when a user name was registered. As was pointed out to me later by another mod, Mr. Realistic was in fact registered on 04.02.2010, the same day as Mr Perfect, so his explanation of what happened regarding the registration process and why he registered two similar user names is quite plausible. The user name Mr. Realistic has been deleted as only one user name is allowed (with the exception of for comedy purposes).
Apologies to Mr Perfect for the confusion that I caused, but the Who's on Line Quick Link made it look as if he was only registering his second user name then.
Happy to clear up my mistake. When I originally looked at who was on-line on 10.02.2010, is showed me that Mr. Realistic was registering (rather than logging in), so my assumption was that the user name Mr. Realistic was only being registered there and then. An IP check then showed me that Mr. Realistic shared an IP address with Mr Perfect, however it does not show when a user name was registered. As was pointed out to me later by another mod, Mr. Realistic was in fact registered on 04.02.2010, the same day as Mr Perfect, so his explanation of what happened regarding the registration process and why he registered two similar user names is quite plausible. The user name Mr. Realistic has been deleted as only one user name is allowed (with the exception of for comedy purposes).
Apologies to Mr Perfect for the confusion that I caused, but the Who's on Line Quick Link made it look as if he was only registering his second user name then.
thanks for clearing that up carlos. but i also dont like being attacked by a mod from this site for raising my concerns about this "luther" when he said "you must have fcuk all to complain about".
if you dont like people raising concerns about something on this site luther maybe you should no longer be a mod.
thanks for clearing that up carlos. but i also dont like being attacked by a mod from this site for raising my concerns about this "luther" when he said "you must have fcuk all to complain about".
if you dont like people raising concerns about something on this site luther maybe you should no longer be a mod.
After you were told numerous times, that perhaps a mistake had been made, then perhaps it is you who has the problem. But it's nice to know that you hold mods in such high esteem that you don't think us fallible, human, or capable of making a small mistake..........
I thank you for your faith.........
Happy to clear up my mistake. When I originally looked at who was on-line on 10.02.2010, is showed me that Mr. Realistic was registering (rather than logging in), so my assumption was that the user name Mr. Realistic was only being registered there and then. An IP check then showed me that Mr. Realistic shared an IP address with Mr Perfect, however it does not show when a user name was registered. As was pointed out to me later by another mod, Mr. Realistic was in fact registered on 04.02.2010, the same day as Mr Perfect, so his explanation of what happened regarding the registration process and why he registered two similar user names is quite plausible. The user name Mr. Realistic has been deleted as only one user name is allowed (with the exception of for comedy purposes).
Apologies to Mr Perfect for the confusion that I caused, but the Who's on Line Quick Link made it look as if he was only registering his second user name then.
One question who the fuck is Mr Perfect ??;)
carlos marvado
12-02-10, 16:39
One question who the fuck is Mr Perfect ??;)
You'll need to ask the escorts who they would regard as being Mr Perfect. However, Mr. Realistic sounds a little bit more.......................well realistic to me. :D:D:D
EnglishTaylor
12-02-10, 19:27
Reading this thread I think it's blatantly obvious that these 2 just didn't hit it off so i wouldn't hold it against either of them. I believe his review was honest as he seen it, but I also think it was out of character for Taylor judging by her previous reviews. Personally both sides could have handled the situation differently (better).
If it's any consolation Taylor I think it has drawn attention to your previous extensive list of positive reviews and I for one have moved you up my Ladies I'd like to see list :o
yes anon you are right it could have been dealt with a bit better, so here is another lesson learnt for me, therefore i can improve on myself, my service & handling a bad review situation, but i did point out too that rules were the main focus also. This section about reviews is improving the reviews system whilst highlighting issues and fake reviews so that they can be dealt with accordingly.
Oh and im delighted that ive moved to your Ladies Id like To See list xxxxx
yes anon you are right it could have been dealt with a bit better, so here is another lesson learnt for me, therefore i can improve on myself, my service & handling a bad review situation, but i did point out too that rules were the main focus also. This section about reviews is improving the reviews system whilst highlighting issues and fake reviews so that they can be dealt with accordingly.
Oh and im delighted that ive moved to your Ladies Id like To See list xxxxx
And so is this the end of this thread, which in reality started when someone was allowed to post a review older than 3 months..when will this change? Allow a week, if the escort is no longer available, have a facility to post 1 week beyond their profile expiring...after that i.e 1 week, no review allowed.....
After you were told numerous times, that perhaps a mistake had been made, then perhaps it is you who has the problem. But it's nice to know that you hold mods in such high esteem that you don't think us fallible, human, or capable of making a small mistake..........
I thank you for your faith.........
at the time it was not a fact it was still in dispute because at the time there were 2 mods with diffrent details and as soon as the mods got their act together and said it was a mistake the matter was cleared up and that still does not make any diffrence to the way you responded to my post by attacking me.
also i dont have any faith in you i feel you are nothing but a bully that has let the small bit of power that modding has giving to you go to your head and make you feel untouchable and think you have the right to abuse other site members as you like.
Quarterpoundher
13-02-10, 21:34
at the time it was not a fact it was still in dispute because at the time there were 2 mods with diffrent details and as soon as the mods got their act together and said it was a mistake the matter was cleared up and that still does not make any diffrence to the way you responded to my post by attacking me.
Our act was actually just fine all the while. I showed you proof and Carlos posted to clear up the matter. We are not here all at the same time, all of the time so you are going to have to accept a little lag time in response when one or another is gone. We are not is same office or something so not realistic to expect when one mod say's one thing and another is required to confirm that they are always going to be on standby to post straight after like you are expecting.
Our act was actually just fine all the while. I showed you proof and Carlos posted to clear up the matter. We are not here all at the same time, all of the time so you are going to have to accept a little lag time in response when one or another is gone. We are not is same office or something so not realistic to expect when one mod say's one thing and another is required to confirm that they are always going to be on standby to post straight after like you are expecting.
fair enough but none of that excuses the way a site mod "luther" responded by saying in the main title of his post "you must have fcuk all else to complain about" or do all the site mods think that that is a proper way to respond to a site member????
you responded to my post by attacking me.
also i dont have any faith in you i feel you are nothing but a bully that has let the small bit of power that modding has giving to you go to your head and make you feel untouchable and think you have the right to abuse other site members as you like.
Abuse you???
I think you're going a bit overboard here...........:rolleyes:
Yes, I have no problem admitting that I am at times somewhat assertive in my posting, I speak my mind, but I would hardly describe the post that you are referring to as "attacking", "abusive" or "bullying"............
If I offend people in my posting style, then I apologise, I don't intend it to be attacking, abusive or bullying. I must remember that some people here must be very sensitive.............
But after you pointed out something here, and you were told it was a mistake, numerous times. Why you couldn't accept that, I just don't know..............
Abuse you???
I think you're going a bit overboard here...........:rolleyes:
Yes, I have no problem admitting that I am at times somewhat assertive in my posting, I speak my mind, but I would hardly describe the post that you are referring to as "attacking", "abusive" or "bullying"............
If I offend people in my posting style, then I apologise, I don't intend it to be attacking, abusive or bullying. I must remember that some people here must be very sensitive.............
But after you pointed out something here, and you were told it was a mistake, numerous times. Why you couldn't accept that, I just don't know..............
its not that i couldnt accept it at the time it was as far as the fourm was concerned still in dispute because at the time carlos had not cleared the matter up and at the time i even said we would have to wait untill carlos responded as it was him who made the claim that he has some evedience and as soon as carlos did respond the matter was cleared up and i cant understand why you cant accept that fact as its clearly stated in some of my earlyer posts.
luther you are also wrong about me being told numerous times that it was a mistake when in fact i was only told once that it was a mistake before you posted that abusive post and then carlos cleared the matter up if you contuine to make the false claims about the ammount of times i was told i will have no choice but to make a formal complaint about your behaviour to the site owner.
luther you are also wrong about me being told numerous times that it was a mistake when in fact i was only told once that it was a mistake before you posted that abusive post
can i just point out that according to another mod "carlos" he registered one id on the 4th and another on the 10th wich is 6 days appart if my math is correct and that does not check out with mr serious's posts or what you have said.
1
No, he created both on the same day. The 4th of Feb. We need to give him a break here, he has been honest and stated what time of year review was, maybe late in doing so but he still did it and what he says about his profiles checks out.
i have to say i find it a bit strange that one mod says he has ip proof that they were created 6 days appart and another mod says no the same day. who are we to believe you or carlos???
2
Its called being human, I am sure Carlos will confirm what i am saying. There is proof of two profiles belonging to him but they were not created days apart but on the same day, 4th of Feb.
only if he goes back on what he said about having proof that they were created 6 days appart and i really hope he does not because i have always found carlos to be honest and claiming to have proof of something when there is no proof is something that a site mod should never do.
heres the post i'm talking about.
3
And here are both profiles date of creation... (see att. pics).
4
Fine. I can do no more then show you both his profile creation dates as shown on pics.
The man is human, if he made a mistake he made a mistake, what's the big fascination with this? It's an honest mistake, let it go man..........
if you contuine to make the false claims about the ammount of times i was told i will have no choice but to make a formal complaint about your behaviour to the site owner.
And that's your prerogative...........
I'm finished.............
1
2
3
4
And that's your prerogative...........
I'm finished.............
you just proved my point only in one of them was it hinted that it was a mistake. and now show me the word mistake anywhere in any of them apart from your abusive post where you didnt include the main title to your post that said "you must have fcuk all else to complain about"
All the rest are still trying to convince you of it...............
Jayf1, I have better things to be doing than going around in circles about this...........
Please don't be insulted or offended if I don't reply here again. I've apologised if my posting style was offensive but I see you've ignored that. I don't think I needed to apologise in the first instance but I did in the hope that you could drop the matter, and I certainly won't be doing it here again.........
Get ur ass to see me, hope you enjoyed your visit to manc & the lap dancing clubs xxxxx[/QUOTE]
You bet I did Taylor, will be keeping an eye out for you and looking forward to the VIP room dance u promised me ! x