Fake Profile Reviews

[IAmLIAm]

I don't think you can review using a VPN.

Don't let the facts ruin a good story...

[AmorInfinito8]

I don't think you can review using a VPN.

Don't let the facts ruin a good story...

You can!!

I used to always login and also review using one

I didn't know it wasn't allowed

SofiaTheMod contacted me and told me one of my reviews was denied because of this or I'd still be doing it none the wiser

My problem at the time was that my phone network had put an internet security on my account for anything 🔞
without asking or informing me and they were charging me for it 🤬

So anytime I tried to login without VPN
my phone wouldn't allow it

My problem was the girl at the time who I wanted to leave a review for and I was extremely fond of was leaving soon

I tried everything searching Google for solutions to no avail

finally I bit the bullet and contacted my service provider/network
(I always find it odd when you all call the girls that, dispite knowing what you mean)

But how do you ask!?
" Can't access Escort Ireland could you please help" 😆😂🤣

Got it sorted anyhow
the guy explained why it was happening and removed it along with the charge!!
(I didn't mention the site, not a complete dumbass)

So over the phone he can remotely see my internet and says
" Please try now to access one of the sites that you've been restricted from so we know the problem has been resolved" 😯😲😳🥵

"Ah don't worry mate I trust you thanks a lot for your time have a good day"

and hung up!!

SofiaTheMod was very understanding once I got it sorted and my review was posted in the nick of time!!

I'd have hated to disappoint the girl

I miss SofiaTheMod and the girl obviously!!

[WellDressed]

I don't think you can review using a VPN.

Don't even let you review when you don't have one.

My last review I was told I was using a VPN, I wasn't, and to resubmit after I turned off my VPN!? Just copy and pasted it and it went through second time.

[BarryD]

I don't think you can review using a VPN.

You can!!

Correct Tony - can't be done, deleted and not included in EOTM. Amor was given a one-off exception upon explanation to mod, presume his decent rep. stood him too.

all the EOTM threads got closed due to speculation so I'll post this here. isn't ironic the below example/posts
we have our rat review/fake updated which disqualified both Dora & Dieve from the competition
hope this helps anyone concerned some transparency/clarity and Liam to calm down (Luana still to be accounted).
have a great weekend folks. weather/life far too nice to be in here

This was certainly a month where I heard so many different slants on the rules.
No second review counts within the month and can't win two months in a row .That all checked in for me ok but when I heard the reviewer had to have minimum 10 reviews already and that even if the reviewer reviewed the escort last year it didn't count that was news to me .
Then I heard if the escort gets under 5 stars in a review its 3 points deducted .
If its a bad review it's 5 points deducted.
Like I really lost all knowledge of the rule...come to think of it I knew then I had no knowledge or are they picking up things that we folks on the outside just don't see .
Anyway, the fact is I don't think we really need to be analytical on it ..Its fun but maybe the escorts can take a lot of it to heart.

Surely repeat business is far greater that winning EOTM ?

if we took yourself just as an example you left a review for both Dieve and Dora this month, if one of those was a fake then it could be a case that both ladies get disqualified, based on the fake, not just 1. some of the lads use that as a yardstick to decide who they visit and/or which handles they might trust as reviewers to consider/read if deciding on a visit.

it's a bit of fun for me/you but the business, can be like most businesses, cut-throat and ruthless. it shows also, despite some of the comments, there is a certain prestige to the winner, everything helps.

[Dieve]

all the EOTM threads got closed due to speculation so I'll post this here. isn't ironic the below example/posts
we have our rat review/fake updated which disqualified both Dora & Dieve from the competition
hope this helps anyone concerned some transparency/clarity and Liam to calm down (Luana still to be accounted).
have a great weekend folks.

MrTony recently created a new account, that's why all of his reviews got ratmarked, not just ours. He even commented on his own thread complimenting how great it is 🤦🏻 This obviously cannot disqualify anyone retroactively, as it happened long after the competition was over, and providers are not liable for their client's authenticity beyond their own reviews. If they were, it would be quite easy to suicide-review someone by visiting as a good boy, then having himself ratmarked afterwards to have several escorts disqualified despite the genuine meets 🙃

Especially easy for his future visits. Provider doesn't know his username before the meet. Bam, gets a ratmarked review for a genuine meet, simply because the user's all future reviews are automatically ratmarked. I doubt the provider deserves to be disqualified because she unknowingly accepted a ratmarked client. Have a great weekend.

[Barney Rubble]

MrTony recently created a new account, that's why all of his reviews got ratmarked, not just ours. He even commented on his own thread complimenting how great it is ���� This obviously cannot disqualify anyone retroactively, as it happened long after the competition was over, and providers are not liable for their client's authenticity beyond their own reviews. If they were, it would be quite easy to suicide-review someone by visiting as a good boy, then having himself ratmarked afterwards to have several escorts disqualified despite the genuine meets ��

Especially easy for his future visits. Provider doesn't know his username before the meet. Bam, gets a ratmarked review for a genuine meet, simply because the user's all future reviews are automatically ratmarked. I doubt the provider deserves to be disqualified because she unknowingly accepted a ratmarked client. Have a great weekend.

So much for giving him a second chance...

[BarryD]

So much for giving him a second chance...

[Larrii]

Just putting it out there, is it possible that there are fake reviewers on here?

I recently visited a girl that had these rave reviews, stunning looking photos, that’s where it ended… she looked nothing like the photos, I mean seriously nothing, she looked like the girl in the photo’s grandmother, I mean it was fucking hilarious… went back through the reviews and realised they all look very suspicious.

I’m so stupid when horny, has to be over 10 reviews from here on in.

Anyway rant over have a good bank holiday…

You have to walk. Instead of a bad review, leave a short note in the "Warning" section, with their link.

As for reviews I would rather see 3 good reviews from 3 guys with 20+ reviews, than 30 reviews from newbies. But, we were all newbies once.

[oddball]

It seems to me a bit of an oddity given that the main reason most probably register with the site is to leave feedback because of escorts, so penalizing them like this seems a little unfair, especially given they have no ability to screen the reviews (which would raise a whole other list of problems, e.g. blocking ones they just don't like).
I do understand the risk of an escort padding her score with fake reviews but surely there's a better approach?

[JustAndy]

for me this is all wrong. When u put a rat (clearly a mouse cuz rats arent that lovely) icon beside the review it automatically makes u think maybe the provider was maybe in on it. If the reviewer was the one in the wrong (like MrTony was on this scenario) why not just delete his review for that meet instead of punishing the provider? I think providers would rather not have the review than have a review that questions their integirty i.e one with a rat (mouse) icon beside it!