Fake Profile Reviews

[rockonallnite]

we do cuz they havent been deleted.

The reason why they have not been deleted is because the mods don't have solid proof that those reviews left there are fake. But the mods knows that the culprit wrote a fake review at least once, (now deleted)so they suspect he could have done the same with some of the other reviews, that's why they put rats in all of the reviews.

BTW a rat next to a review does not mean the review is fake, it means the REVIEWER is dodgy, so take what's written there with a pinch of salt...
I know it's harsh for hard working and genuine providers to have a rat in their reviews, but mods have to discourage the writing of fake reviews somehow...
WE all have ro do our part if we want a better system and report dodgy reviews...

[Palatine]

BTW a rat next to a review does not mean the review is fake, it means the REVIEWER is dodgy

You and I both know that when you look at a provider and she has rats in her reviews, you assume that she has something to do with it. When you see a rat on a review, you assume that particular review is fake. People don't research the EI User Manual to dissect the rules and regulations, and EI is so opaque anyway (with their actions seeming to be completely inconsistent with whatever rules have been excavated) that it's difficult not to draw wrong conclusions. The rat does affect the provider and EI lets it sit there like a shitty towel on the door.

This whole thread is demonstrative of that with two girls being given the no-smoke no-fire treatment with zero evidence they've done anything wrong.

Little inner circles of kiss-arses and fanboys are now using this to shoot darts at their princess's supposed rivals. All very childish and insensitive to the effects that has.

For the record, I've never met Dora or Dieve.

[rockonallnite]

You and I both know that when you look at a provider and she has rats in her reviews, you assume that she has something to do with it. When you see a rat on a review, you assume that particular review is fake. People don't research the EI User Manual to dissect the rules and regulations, and EI is so opaque anyway (with their actions seeming to be completely inconsistent with whatever rules have been excavated) that it's difficult not to draw wrong conclusions. The rat does affect the provider and EI lets it sit there like a shitty towel on the door.

This whole thread is demonstrative of that with two girls being given the no-smoke no-fire treatment with zero evidence they've done anything wrong.

Little inner circles of kiss-arses and fanboys are now using this to shoot darts at their princess's supposed rivals. All very childish and insensitive to the effects that has.

For the record, I've never met Dora or Dieve.

I'm not accusing Dieve or Dora of doing something wrong.
Both of them have hundreds of reviews and 1 rat next to 1 review will not change anything.
If you see the escort with more than 1 rat from different reviewers, then I might suspect something.
Again, a rat next to a review doesn't mean the review is fake.

Have alook what Sofia said:

https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...3-Fake-reviews

I understand what you said about the inner circles and the minions, and agree with you, just for the record I'm not one of
them. I'm a lone wolf...

[Palatine]

I'm not accusing Dieve or Dora of doing something wrong.

I'm not saying that you did. What I'm saying is that you're looking on the bright side - it's all fine, there's a rule here that explains everything and it's fine. People don't read the manuals when they buy a new appliance these days, never mind try to understand EI rules when looking at reviews.

But people on this thread and others have used this and the insinuations around reviews not counting towards EOTM to make snidey remarks about the providers. Rather than minimising that by taking a technocratic analysis of the rules, I'm happy to call it out.

[Palatine]

could not agree more man but can i point out also its a mistake to frame this as dieve -v- michelle cuz its not! its whoever sent michelle the link to that website and told her it was example of some thing it wasnt -v- dieve. remember what Tommy selby says in Peaky Blinders?

"red ants and black ants will live peacefully in a bottle unless this bottle is shook; only then will they attack each other, thinking the other kind is the enemy. Meanwhile, the real enemy is the one who has shaken the bottle."



who shook the bottle only michelle knows but she was manipulated.

Well, maybe Michelle can own that and let us all know who that was. Only she knows who shook the jar.

To me, the "other site" review added nothing that isn't known here. It wasn't the gotcha that the instigator thought it was.

Dieve asks real customers if they're on the boards and if so, to review her. Big fucking deal. Do people forget this is a business?

[AngelsFan]

This whole thread is demonstrative of that with two girls being given the no-smoke no-fire treatment with zero evidence they've done anything wrong.

Little inner circles of kiss-arses and fanboys are now using this to shoot darts at their princess's supposed rivals. All very childish and insensitive to the effects that has.

But people on this thread and others have used this and the insinuations around reviews not counting towards EOTM to make snidey remarks about the providers. Rather than minimising that by taking a technocratic analysis of the rules, I'm happy to call it out.

Dieve asks real customers if they're on the boards and if so, to review her. Big fucking deal. Do people forget this is a business?

I agree with every word of this.

A lad started a thread a while back looking for recommendations for a good pub to go out in, in Belfast where he might have some luck on the pull, and it kicked off a massive tirade from the usual suspects.

All about respect and respecting the forum as it’s a workplace for the women. You’d think he had wandered in with a brown streaked towel in his hand asking “where’s a good place to hang this up then?” the reaction he got.

Chat here and elsewhere of needing a safe place for the ladies to post.

It seems to me that, that’s the last thing they want. When they get the claws out it’d leave any troll in the shade.

[oddball]

Based on the hostility on display in another thread today it's not just the ladies whipping out the claws supposedly to provide a safe space for the ladies.
Which does leave me in mind of the whole "reset the clocks" male feminist thing and the "nice guy" thing as that sort of hostility doesn't just come from nowhere or go away when in the company of someone you're supposedly looking out for.

[EscortInspector]

Some amount of shite talk, thread should be merged with the hygiene thread

[Irelandbeautyyy]

Iam not sure what reaction is expected from me. I said all in my comment why i reacted how i did. I didn’t expect such a bitting note from person who is also complaining about irish hygiene as well.

So i just recommended to keep her attention in her way if she is not able to contribute in such important topic. Iam not going to analyse anything. Iam not a doctor and this discussion is not right. Again i only reacted to her post and i recommended to mind her business instead of bitting contribution.

This topic is closed for me.

[Palatine]

Iam not sure what reaction is expected from me. I said all in my comment why i reacted how i did. I didn’t expect such a bitting note from person who is also complaining about irish hygiene as well.

So i just recommended to keep her attention in her way if she is not able to contribute in such important topic. Iam not going to analyse anything. Iam not a doctor and this discussion is not right. Again i only reacted to her post and i recommended to mind her business instead of bitting contribution.

This topic is closed for me.

I realise English isn't everyone's language, so I'm making allowances. But 1) I see no "biting" in the comment. If anything you were the one snapping at the heels of others in the thread who didn't reply in a way you approved on. 2) You had the option to deal with what you saw as "biting" in a PM first, and 3) the action to draw attention to another site's review was disproportionate to someone using the wrong tone with you.