Fake Profile Reviews

[Harry68]

I’m not clear BarryD how the scorched earth done on all his reviews can be viewed as a negative for the providers involved?

Not trying to stir a pot but surely it’s all on him rather than any of them.

[BarryD]

I’m not clear BarryD how the scorched earth done on all his reviews can be viewed as a negative for the providers involved?

Not trying to stir a pot but surely it’s all on him rather than any of them.

integrity / sound character is what it boils down to.
possible a Provider was soliciting / canvassing for the fake so has to go/works both ways

[Harry68]

Fair enough seems more than a touch of the sledgehammer about it but as you say no one knows the full facts and it’s hard to trust anyone who’s posted even a single fake review so maybe it was the way to go.

[BarryD]

yup but all 24 of his reviews have been marked with the mouse/rat so either 17 different providers asked for a fake review or he's the one with questionible integirty, not the providers. there the ones branded forever by whatever MrTony did. that's why it's not fair imo.

Other problem round here past while is multiple/fake profiles.
Dictating and directing the boards. If you had a bit of rep. might pay a bit of attn. to your profile

mouse icon only went on the account v. recently so shows it was a recent review. Futhermore, we have an answer for why 2 providers were disqualified from EOTM.

doesnt take much intelligence to work it out from all going on, everything adds up. Again, ultimately folks make up their own mind. People round aren't simple, they can see all the indicators and inconsistencies

[Hunter Green]

we are told 1/3 of a version of a story in the MrTony scenario, other side and the truth are missing

stamping a mouse icon on a Provider isn't something E-I would do lightly unless good reason, not seen it in current times.
E-I cover both avenues, Punter and Provider with the icon because they may not be able to prove either way, who instigated/canvassed for the fake.

concerns are also being raised by Providers on the sheer volume of reviews some are culminating on a day by day / week by week / month by month basis and how the numbers being achieved are unrealistic. also some Punter/Provider relationships which have been highlighted, point towards v. questionable character with unhealthy plans/schemes

Ultimately folks make up their own minds how they see it.

who I feel most for is the salt of the earth/genuine ladies advertising, who go out of their way to be professional and do so with class, dignity and respect, who get tricked and deceived by it.

Are you an E-I moderator of some sort?

[oddball]

I don't need u to pay attention to me. Am not a dog. All am saying is if u want to engineer a conspiracy where popular escorts are only popular cuz of fake reviews, u need to provide alot more than what u have provided cuz ur theories arent adding up!

Maybe I'm mistaken but I don't think he meant he was putting you down because of your rep but that people were setting up multiple/fake profiles so they could use Profile B to boost Profile A, and vice-versa, boosting those profiles rep and get people to listen to them so they could manipulate the boards.

[MistressMonique]

Lads it's not really any great shock though that this review system is screwed ... You can't expect people to share their intimate experiences in real detail so you either get the same reviewers reviewing or just positive not negative for fear of abuse or retaliation... BarryD didn't it come out that you had access to Michelle's account and every time you started a thread with beautiful pictures of Michelle it could be interpreted as a non punter thread...the beautiful ladies thread I have asked a few times for curvy women that's how I like mine we are not all wanting to eat the chicken wing when compared to a juicy rump ... Choose who you like the look of and has your favourites and pick up the phone to your chosen lady you should know by the vibe on the phone... Don't be a sheep when you can be a Flamingo

[BarryD]

Maybe I'm mistaken but I don't think he meant he was putting you down because of your rep but that people were setting up multiple/fake profiles so they could use Profile B to boost Profile A, and vice-versa, boosting those profiles rep and get people to listen to them so they could manipulate the boards.

be part of it, also different profiles to influence/control/dictate/direct the boards. that account is far too emotionally involved / histrionic / dramatic / disordered for 2 day old

Lads it's not really any great shock though that this review system is screwed ... You can't expect people to share their intimate experiences in real detail so you either get the same reviewers reviewing or just positive not negative for fear of abuse or retaliation... BarryD didn't it come out that you had access to Michelle's account and every time you started a thread with beautiful pictures of Michelle it could be interpreted as a non punter thread...the beautiful ladies thread I have asked a few times for curvy women that's how I like mine we are not all wanting to eat the chicken wing when compared to a juicy rump ... Choose who you like the look of and has your favourites and pick up the phone to your chosen lady you should know by the vibe on the phone... Don't be a sheep when you can be a Flamingo

review system is screwed/lacking credibility more so than before, as someone mentioned the "sledgehammer" approach had to come out to be taken seriously and set a marker. again those I feel sorry for are all the decent, genuine providers who act with integrity. v. disrespectful to those providers when a fake(s) are used to get a potential leg up.

access to Michelle's account you are mistaken / inaccurate on that one
contacted Michelle in the past by PM to ask permission to share some of her Twtr pics on the boards, because it's not the same platform felt it was necessary.
is that me having access to her account? Nope. it's me having access to her public gallery on Twtr

exactly folks should make up their own minds, they aren't simpletons, had my mind made up on certain advertisers long ago, once they started getting involved with dirt.
this latest drama just shows it up / gives more indication/indicators ... it is what it is ...

[IrishSarahBarra]

Is that the speculation? Dieve didn't take any fake reviews. She wouldn't take them, I know that for a fact.

My side of the story:

This is about something else 🤷🏼 and bad management.

I know she wouldn't take them because being a good friend and previous to this month's competition, I offered her some of my client reviewers who haven't reviewed me. As was offered to me by a friend once upon a time.

At the time, I didn't like want to see her burn out, and the wheel of favours goes around....

(Yes, I have an issue with loyalty versus morality, where loyalties lie, am I going with black and white thinking or is everything grey. Then, always or sometimes and what does that mean. Yadda yadda.

(Look, I won't be offering them to someone again. The pass it on wheel has gone around once and no takers; I am off the hook.)

> so, in my eyes, a fiver for a 2 minute virtual can be enough to justify to oneself that someone is a client if one wants to think like that.)

I was hoping for herself that she would not take them because they might haunt her later on (she's a good person) and I'm glad she didn't -

she didn't want them/ doesn't want them because she wants to take it 100pc fairly or not at all.

She asked me to recommend her to my clients for a visit instead. Which I didn't do because, primarily, I have no idea what she's like in an appointment and I hadn't met her in person by then, and I won't recommend to my clients that they go see someone until I have a solid degree of certainty that they'll be happy they went.

I have the screenshots 🥴

Like the sound of my little confession or not, Dieve did nothing wrong in any of this.

[Harry68]

You are commendably honest there. I am also glad she did not take you up on your offer. I don’t think she needs to.