Fake Profile Reviews

[IrishSarahBarra]

You are commendably honest there. I am also glad she did not take you up on your offer. I don’t think she needs to.

Yup, she doesn't have to 🩷

[Harry68]

I would say it shows how manipulatable the system is especially given the relatively tight margins needed to win sometimes. I’m not throwing stones at anyone either.

[IAmLIAm]

Other problem round here past while is multiple/fake profiles.
Dictating and directing the boards. If you had a bit of rep. might pay a bit of attn. to your profile

mouse icon only went on the account v. recently so shows it was a recent review. Futhermore, we have an answer for why 2 providers were disqualified from EOTM.

doesnt take much intelligence to work it out from all going on, everything adds up. Again, ultimately folks make up their own mind. People round aren't simple, they can see all the indicators and inconsistencies

Actually, we don't have an answer... We have more speculation, primarily from you.

By your logic, one could make the assertion that you create burner accounts just to engage as a bad actor (playing both sides, sacrificing the new accounts to bolster and prove right the main account, all to create a sense of worth and value to compensate for an otherwise sad life). I mean, it's a bridge too far in my eyes, but for someone with the sensibilities of a conspiracy theorist it might fit.

[IrishSarahBarra]

Actually, we don't have an answer... We have more speculation, primarily from you.

By your logic, one could make the assertion that you create burner accounts just to engage as a bad actor (playing both sides, sacrificing the new accounts to bolster and prove right the main account, all to create a sense of worth and value to compensate for an otherwise sad life). I mean, it's a bridge too far in my eyes, but for someone with the sensibilities of a conspiracy theorist it might fit.

Mm, but it's not damaging to accuse random client profiles of things. Where it's very unfair to leave Dieve being accused of things she didn't do. Very bad management.

And Dora?? I don't know why we're even talking about Dora. She wasn't even going for Eotm? She was getting reviews alright but nothing to do with her running for Eotm. She knows her reviews wouldn't qualify because they were from past reviewers?

[WellDressed]

This could be all put to bed if management just step in and explain the situation.

Either "this is why it happened" or "we screwed up, our bad"

It's all that's needed.

[IrishSarahBarra]

I know, sorry lol, didn't mean it like that �� I know how we got started I meant how did Barry get started.

Words. Brian Cox. Bye x

[rockonallnite]

on topic of fake reviews sofiathemod wrote this in feb 23'

"we delete the fake review and then add the rat to all other reviews, even the genuine ones."

dora and dieve's review by MrTony haven't been deleted by escort Ireland so is it okay to say neither of those reviews were the fake??

allow me to point out also that wanting good reviews (based on real meetings) is not unethical. its business. good reviews (again, based on real meetings) create more customers. more customers creates more business. more business creates more revenue. this is the v essence of business!

has no1 here been encouraged by service provider (window cleaner, taxi driver, barber) to give a review if there happy with the service provided? i have.

i think we need to learn difference between fake reviews and good business cuz the two are so hugely different.

I was gonna post what Sofia, a.k.a. " the ratalorian" posted but you got it first.

At least 1 of those 24 reviews is fake, the other ones are real...which one is the question?

BTW, have I see you here before?! How do you know so much about Eotm rules, rep points, etc
I smell something fishy, and trust me, I have been here a long time...
I will give you the benefit of the doubt for now...I will like to see your first review, girls will thank you for that.

[rockonallnite]

no i think going by sofia quote (which i found in sticky thread on review section by chance btw, i dont memorise eotm rules) the fake would already be deleted so the 24 are real? thats my interpretation of it anyway. may be wrong.

and no we dont know each other but i did have another account a few years ago yup. its not banned i closed it voluntarily. if u'd like mods to vet me and verify what am saying, no probs sir.

Yes, the fake was deleted, no one knows if the other one are fake or real ones, so the rats stayed on every review...
There is no moderators around...we do our own moderation from now

[Irelandbeautyyy]

Sometimes it’s the best just moove on…

[Palatine]

Sometimes it's best not to shitstir and try a takedown on a decent person's reputation because someone was in a shitty mood (pardon the pun) and interpreted a question in the most negative way possible.

While it's easy to sneer at someone trying to maximise their reviews, as long as those are legitimate reviews - who cares?

What happened in response to that perceived "slight" was far less ethical and reflects far worse on the author than asking a few customers for a review.